• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Aguilar 410 Conundrum

Sep 21, 2016
375
798
I love my DB410 but at 46Kgs it doesn't leave the house a lot. Would I be losing a lot with an SL410x ? I had a pair of SL112s which I found very underwhelming thus the hesitancy on its bigger brother.
 
I've yet to see/play a neo cab that sounds as good as it's ceramic equivalent. Have you considered going with ceramic 2x 112's (modular)?
I don't for a moment dispute your experience, but fortunately the cabs I've had a chance to listen to haven't suffered from using a Neo magnet driver(s). The differences I hear between cabs these days are more often than not the result of many design decisions, with magnet material being probably the least audibly significant.

In my mind, magnet material is just one ingredient among a long list of ingredients that go into a speaker recipe. I think Neo magnets opened up the trade space in many ways (from structural considerations to voicing/performance), but IME have little to no direct audible artifacts that cause me to immediately conclude "they're Neos".
 
I don't for a moment dispute your experience, but fortunately the cabs I've had a chance to listen to haven't suffered from using a Neo magnet driver(s). The differences I hear between cabs these days are more often than not the result of many design decisions, with magnet material being probably the least audibly significant.

In my mind, magnet material is just one ingredient among a long list of ingredients that go into a speaker recipe. I think Neo magnets opened up the trade space in many ways (from structural considerations to voicing/performance), but IME have little to no direct audible artifacts that cause me to immediately conclude "they're Neos".
It is all totally subjective. I choose ceramic to neo because I thought it sounded better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al Kraft
I've yet to see/play a neo cab that sounds as good as it's ceramic equivalent. Have you considered going with ceramic 2x 112's (modular)?

Yes, I have a pair of Berg HD112s and HD210s which are great with a TH500 and DB751 respectively. Just thinking of adding a lightweight 410 to the herd. I really am a ceramics guy, but the holy grail is a neo 410 that sounds like a ceramic 410 and wondered if the SL410x might be the one?
 
  • Like
Reactions: David A. Davis
It is all totally subjective. I choose ceramic to neo because I thought it sounded better.
...and there is no question that different cabs even with the identical drivers can sound different because of many other design aspects. I suspect that in smaller, lightweight cabs the nature of some of the design choices to optimize in those areas concomitantly eats into the trade space for voicing. I do recall some earlier light weight cans I heard that also utilized Neo drivers did not have the fullness or heft to the notes of previous cabs from the same manufacturer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wncBass and five7
I love my DB410 but at 46Kgs it doesn't leave the house a lot. Would I be losing a lot with an SL410x ? I had a pair of SL112s which I found very underwhelming thus the hesitancy on its bigger brother.

The SL line is much more sonically similar to the GS line than the DB line.

Maybe give the DB212 a try if you like the sonics but not the weight.
 
Yes, I have a pair of Berg HD112s and HD210s which are great with a TH500 and DB751 respectively. Just thinking of adding a lightweight 410 to the herd. I really am a ceramics guy, but the holy grail is a neo 410 that sounds like a ceramic 410 and wondered if the SL410x might be the one?

I'd look into Barefaced or RevSound first, I wasn't a big fan of the SL112 at all either and the 410 is certainly going to share similarities at the very least.