I posted that here a month ago. Check this one out.
The notorious repost
I knew it was familiar and had probably been posted. Pretty impressive coordination.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I posted that here a month ago. Check this one out.
I knew it was familiar and had probably been posted. This is about analog video, but I feel that the spirit of it applies to working with analog and vintage music gear as well. Made me laugh, and then made me contemplate the pile of gear I have...
The (pr)E-Bow? Can we get one for bass?
You need to have a way to affix it to the bass.
I suggest using a Fender-Jazz style bass and remove the "ash-tray" bridge cover and the pickup cover, and use those two items' screw-holes for the fabricated mount that holds/stabilises the hurdy-gurdy tone-wheel.
For a Fender-Precision (or Jazz again) same deal but the pickup-cover mounting points could be swapped out for removing a few of the pickguard screws...
I'm thinking adjustable-along-a-track idea and then a wing-nut to lock it into place over only two strings.This would be an interesting project.
I wonder what tuning makes sense for this drone machine.
I'm thinking adjustable-along-a-track idea and then a wing-nut to lock it into place over only two strings.
Kind of like the Gibson Grabber pickups or Westone Rail, but of course moving the tone-wheel crank perpendicular to the string direction.
So three positions: EA / AD / DG
Strings tuned however you like, though.
Hmm I've been thinker-tinkering only 4-string bass, but a 5er or 6y — I'd still want only two strings droning at a time, personally.
Ooohhh...
Now, start adding octave courses... an 8-string or 10-string or 12-string... still only want two adjacent courses at a time.
HOWZABOUT...
FULL-CUSTOM... "2-string" bass, but two courses of THREE (3) for the Hurdy-Gurdy tone-wheel to hit...
...but that's limiting, who wants to have to swap basses between sets or worse — in the middle of a tune?
So it must be a DOUBLE-NECK with a regular bass neck on top and the Hurdy-Gurdy bass on the bottom... but...
FRETLESS, so it needs to be a TRIPLE-NECK!
Alas, what good is this Hurdy-Gurdy thing if you can't go micro-tonal?
QUADRUPLE-NECK ! ! ! !TOP TO BOTTOM:
- FIVE/SIX-STRING FRETTED
- FOUR-STRING FRETLESS
- FRETLESS HURDY-GURDY 6-string (2x courses of 3)
- FRETTED HURDY-GURDY 6-string (2x courses of 3)
BUT WEIGHT! THERE's MORE! "¡¡QUINTUPLE NECK!!!
A 5th NECK, ie that of the hired LIVE-IN PERSONAL-TRAINER, TO HELP YOU DEVELOP YOUR CORE AND BACK-MUSCLES TO HANDLE THE WEIGHT...
A buddy of mine in LA who worked in video editing bought some video synthesizer stuff for fun (basically a lot of the stuff from this video) and within a few years had so much demand for his work within mostly lo-fi music scenes that he stays booked pretty much constantly at this point.
Here's a video he did for my old band soon after he first started (I think one of his first (low!) paid gigs):
And a few more recent examples:
The National Portrait Gallery in DC used to have a huge video art section in the upstairs "modern art" gallery, which involved a lot of early video synthesis artists from the 1970s, including the late great Nam June Paik. His "Megatron Matrix" was one of the most impressive things I've seen in terms of scale, it took up a whole room and the crt tubes must use as much power in an hour as my home does in a month lol.
I certainly appreciate the stuff he made for our band (he did a couple different videos for us)- we mostly just gave some general suggestions about the sort of material to work from (the one I linked used Zardoz and some other similar footage) and he blended it with some synced live show material of ours (that we recorded to a click that matched the studio record). I feel like some of the recent bands that are using his work are going for something more formulaic in contrast. Still fun to watch, I just know him well enough to know that he has more to offer!Well, I haven't gotten tired of lo-fi 80s corny stuff yet, so I hope he feels appreciated.![]()
It's like anything else, photographers would love to do artsy stuff but cheesy wedding photography is what sells. Bands love to make original music but playing cover songs they hate (often at weddings, lol) is what sells.I certainly appreciate the stuff he made for our band (he did a couple different videos for us)- we mostly just gave some general suggestions about the sort of material to work from (the one I linked used Zardoz and some other similar footage) and he blended it with some synced live show material of ours (that we recorded to a click that matched the studio record). I feel like some of the recent bands that are using his work are going for something more formulaic in contrast. Still fun to watch, I just know him well enough to know that he has more to offer!


Apologies if someone posted this here before.
I'm fascinated trying to figure out what exactly they're doing...less so by the music they're making, but if the mechanics are anything like what I'm imagining they are, I suspect some more engaging (and appropriately Ambient Post-Rock Textural) stuff might result.
Interesting DAW related content. It is beyond my pay grade, so I might need to watch it again. Seems like something the regulars here might appreciate.