• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Amp Guts Photos - Official Thread - Lets see those pics

Should we also add Bass Guts to this thread too?

  • Yes, Allow Bass guts, afterall Guts is Guts

    Votes: 223 28.7%
  • No way! Keep 'em seperate

    Votes: 553 71.3%

  • Total voters
    776
thanks. i did clean it a little, but it was pretty darn clean to begin with.

2000s-w-cab-800-w.jpg


here it is with its sister:

IMG_0004-2-3.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreaserMatt
yeah, i've had four Studio bass amps over the years. i converted this one to a head/cab configuration to make it a bit easier to transport. i used a JBL E140 in the cabinet.

Sudiobasshead-1-w.jpg


1-15cab-inside-1-w.jpg


Studiobassamp-1-800-2.jpg


I also built up another one using a Super Twin for the head (its basically the exact same amp as a studio bass), but on this one i used a bassman 100 cab loaded with two JBL K140's. this one really puts out alot of sound (power!)

supertwin-2-w.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreaserMatt
Here's the guts to my Bass 400+ that I've had for a year and a half, but haven't finished putting together...

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


2001 SWR SM-900- really similar to the SM400s a few pages ago...

normal_SWRguts.jpg


normal_SWRguts2.jpg




And one of my two Seymour Duncan 300x2 amps (although I refer to them as 300x300. This one has been kind of butchered, but it's the better sounding of the two:

normal_seymourfront.jpg


normal_seymourguts1.jpg


normal_seymourguts2.jpg


And my exuse to get my wife's old T/A in the pic...

normal_seymourback.jpg



seymour%2Bswr.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreaserMatt
By the way. Isnt that duncan the 8000? I never got to cracking mine open but yours looks like it? Unless its just a stereo head for more output

The Duncans I have are the 300x2- and that's the way it's written on the amp as well as the manual on the SD site:

http://www.seymourduncan.com/images/support/amp_manuals/bass_300x2.pdf

The numbering scheme kind of confuses me- I've "heard of" the 4000 and the 8000, but the only ones I've seen are the 300x2. I've heard of people owning the 400x2 amps, but never seen one in person.

Looking at the Bass 400 manual- the difference is the bi-amp feature (or dual mono). For the amp that's detailed- the individual "channels" of the amp are disabled- but they're functional on my "stock" head- and I used to get a lot of use out of the dual mono feature- my 4x10 could take more power than my Triad- so I was able to do that with the seperate volume outputs. They're both still good amps- the "chicken head" is a bit fragile- I don't know all the work or repair that's gone on in there before I got it around 13 years ago... The Stock one has never had any serious issues- but they both don't have the same "immediacy" or bottom end that the SWR has. They're still more awesome than any other SS head made before 1990 that I've come across...