• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg PF-500 / PF-800 in 2026?

Hey y'all. Curious about present-day experiences with the discontinued class-D Ampeg PF series.

I'm interested in knowing:
- How are they holding up these days from a reliability perspective? (especially given the mixed track record on the first batch)
- Anyone who converted to the Venture series, how do they compare? If you switched, was it worth it?
- How are they measuring up against other brands newer class-D amps?
- Is Yampegaha supporting these in any way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: robert_stuart
I've had my PF-800 since 2013? maybe. Never had an issue and it's still going strong. I will say that I don't use it as much as I used to as I gig with my Fender Rumble these days. Only because it's easier to move.

ampegstack.jpg
 
Not your question, but I use my PF350 nearly every day. No problems.
Same. It stays in my rehearsal space and gets used daily, some 10 years now. I have a PF-500 too that I gig occasionally, got it on sale when Ampeg was blowing them out for the new Venture line. It’s been good too. I’ve got nothing bad to say about either.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kegan Heiss
Like another commenter, I bought my PF500 on closeout and have been really happy with it. Not sure I would buy a 500 without a warranty, but wouldn’t hesitate buying a 350 or 800.

They’re by no means heavy, but definitely weigh about twice as much as a comparable class d amp. Still a featherweight compared to the old days, though.
 
I still have my PF-800. Had a PF-500 (no issues but ran out of steam for a gig where I was way too loud anyway). I didn't really dig all of the IR craziness with the SGT-DI so it keeps me away from wanting the Venture. The PF-800 has that Ampeg tone and I also get that from my RB110, B100r, and B15N (my favorite out of all is the RB110).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kegan Heiss
From what I remember, there was a series of PF500s with a specific circuit board that had a component on that board with a very high percentage fail rate. After that build run and the change to the next series board, their fail rate declined to industry average. Best I remember, the PF350 & 800 were not involved.

The PF500 “sudden fail syndrome” was over 10 years ago and the changes made to correct the issue was also over 10 years ago. Units built after that era were about the same reliability as any similar amp, but Ampeg reputation took a major hit for a while. I wouldn’t buy a used one without finding the ID info of ones that failed in minutes so I could at least avoid that batch.

There are more than a few threads about the PF500 failing era. Here’s a link to one from 2015;

 
Last edited: