Rotos are nice. Have you tried LaBella DTB? They are rich sounding and feel more like what you are describing. Chromes are good too but they may be stiffer than you want.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Those are the two sets that I like most best. I'd characterize them as saying they're midrange focused rather than thumps or dead. They're not bright like the cobalt flats.Hi all,
I am continuing my search for the perfect "modern" flatwound string (for me that is). My criteria is fairly simple, I'm looking for sustain, clarity/punch, and a reasonable tension as I'm not a big fan of the bridge cable-like stiffness of some heavy gage traditional flats. I've narrowed my choices down to the dunlops and rotosounds, after having tried TI's and EB cobalts and determining that both sets are just too floppy for me. I'm aware that the R77's tend to be characteristically "bright" out of the package but how long does that brightness and clarity remain? How do they compare to the dunlops? For the life of me I'm unable to find an adequate demo of the Dunlops to where I can really hear their unique characteristics. Any advice would be appreciated.
Just out of curiosity, what kind of music are you playing?
I love Dunlop flats. No experience with the 77's.
You say, "Yeah," but your first quoted post states that you did NOT try the heaviest set of the EB Flats – which is what I asked about. They make a 55–110 set. One can expect looser strings with 100s and 105s, especially on the low end.
The RS 77s will age more drastically than the EB flats, and will be significantly stiffer feeling. That said, "aging" can easily be compensated for with flat wounds, just using basic e.q. controls. IMO, the first year or so on ANY set of flats has them sounding not quite to their ideal yet. It's only once they get old that I feel they are sounding and feeling as they "should," to my mind. Until then, I dial out more treble and run them with slightly higher action.
RS 77s and EB flats are not really comparable. They are different styles of strings. The 77s are very classic. Stiff. "Boomy." Yet more aggressive mids than classic LaBellas. The EBs are all about modern feel with a nice compromise of modern and classic tone. They feel looser than most flats, and they don't have the overwhelming low end of many of the classic style sets. But, the thicker sets move you more toward the LaBella zone, in terms of feel and low end.
La Bella DTB 110s are my primary set. A custom EB 105 set (45, 60, 80 105), made from single strings, is my secondary – for lower tension, less classic boominess, and more fret slap. RS 77s are my #3 set, used for low middy classic sounding aggressive flat wound tone.
I tend to use the LaBellas with classic Fender basses, the EBs on basses that are hotter (e.g. most of my G&Ls), and the RS 77s (105 set) on my non-active, but not necessarily "vintage style" basses.
45-105 and 45-100. I generally prefer medium/light strings. Never been a fan of heavy gauge.Which set if EBs Cobalt Flats did you try? There are three gauges that I know of.
45-105 and 45-100. I generally prefer medium/light strings. Never been a fan of heavy gauge.
That's what i have started using (9050) does the job for me. Especially good on a hot pup bass like my Cort P.Have you tried fender 45-100 9050L? They’re pretty punchy with a good even tension that’s not too floppy. Also, EB group 3 flats are pretty mid-tension.
The RS77LE set has been my go-to for over 30 years. They last forever.
Very interesting! In my experience the D+G mellow out really fast and the E+A stay bright for a very long time. Especially the E. Have you never experienced this unbalanced tone across the strings with Roto 77s? I'm not talking about subtle differences here, it sounds pretty much like using flats for D+G and rounds for E+A.