You know, at first I thought this was going to be one of those threads where people debate a .000001% type issue. But as it turns out, I think I learned something. (seriously) I'm just not sure what it was. (again, seriously)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I see that this thread has been hijacked but please continue...
What if somebody THINKS they hear a difference, or is SURE they hear a difference, even if a difference doesn't exist?
Output transformers used to be necessary to drive electrostatic speakers, as well as to drive long distributed speaker system lines at 100 volts RMS. In the case of the distributed speaker system example, the output transformers served 2 purposes. The first was to step up the voltage of the amp, and the second was to isolate the amp from the outside world load (and all of the possible complications that damage to thousands (or tens of thousands) of feet of wiring might cause) In these applications, I wouldn't say that transformers are gimmicks.
+1, and they shouldn't be used when they aren't. Early SS amps used output transformers because they had to with the output transistors available at the time. One of the great technological leaps of the 1960s was the introduction of direct coupled output transistors, which allowed the elimination of ten pounds of iron and copper.Transformers are always used where they are necessary.
The Mesa Walkabout has a toroidal transformer like the one in your pic.
They are very effective in making sure that your amp doesn't blow away in high winds.![]()

Obsoleted by the Fender Rumble's magnet system.![]()
The Mesa Walkabout has a toroidal transformer like the one in your pic.
They are very effective in making sure that your amp doesn't blow away in high winds.![]()
Of course that is a power transformer for the line frequency power supply, not an output transformer.
Ah, OK. What I don't know about electrical components and electronics can just about fill a warehouse. I just knew that my Walkabout had that boat anchor in it; I wasn't sure of the function.
What if somebody THINKS they hear a difference, or is SURE they hear a difference, even if a difference doesn't exist?
Output transformers used to be necessary to drive electrostatic speakers, as well as to drive long distributed speaker system lines at 100 volts RMS. In the case of the distributed speaker system example, the output transformers served 2 purposes. The first was to step up the voltage of the amp, and the second was to isolate the amp from the outside world load (and all of the possible complications that damage to thousands (or tens of thousands) of feet of wiring might cause) In these applications, I wouldn't say that transformers are gimmicks.
OTs saturation introduces harmonic distortion and compression that is well documented. It can be measured and it is audible, particularly at low frequencies. Proper audio design tells us that the transformers should be calculated and constructed to operate without saturation at the designed power level. This could or could not be the case in a given device. So, yes, OT could potentially affect the tone. They are not magical devices that transform an amp into magic. In fact, a properly designed and built transformer should be fairly transparent.
The point Mr. Neve makes is that the sound is improved through the use of the audio transformers, class-A signal path, proper layout and components, etc.
Transformers aren't just about impedance matching, they change the signal and can impart tone. There are qualities that come out when the proper transformers are used. That is where the art in transformer design becomes important. With tests, two pieces can appear to be performing the same but they sound quite different. We can't, or perhaps don't know how at this point, measure everything related to the performance of a circuit with test equipment.