Or lack of QC.Mojo = QC
Every component that goes into a bass has a certain tolerance, say + or - .05. Depending how much drift there is within the tolerance speced for each component, the feel of a bass could be different. Maybe better maybe not.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Or lack of QC.Mojo = QC
Dude, my fellow TB members didn't understand my definition of Mojo so I had to modify it.To start a thread and then go back to it and make massive changes to the first starter post is the ultimate in TB flim flammery IMO.
I'm half tempted to start a thread about P basses being the ultimate groove machine and then, nearly 24 hours later, going in and changing "P basses" to "Brady Bunch" or something else that completely changes the vibe.
Bait and switch city, OP.![]()
Dude, my fellow TB members didn't understand my definition of Mojo so I had to modify it.
Even after modifying it members continue to talk about magic and vintage instruments.
It's my thread and I don't need your permission to modify it. I you don't like it then feel free to stay off my thread!
To start a thread and then go back to it and make massive changes to the first starter post is the ultimate in TB flim flammery IMO.
I'm half tempted to start a thread about P basses being the ultimate groove machine and then, nearly 24 hours later, going in and changing "P basses" to "Brady Bunch" or something else that completely changes the vibe.
Bait and switch city, OP.![]()
TO CLARIFY THINGS my definition of MOJO has nothing to do with magic, voodoo, being worn, being a VINTAGE INSTRUMENT, etc......
My definition of Mojo is defined as a bass that has an inherent superior tone. If the bass had to replaced it would be difficult to find an identical model or a different model with equal tone!
Yes, I know for a fact that some basses have "superior" tone. It's not a question of "belief" since it's well known that they do, in fact, exist.
However, what is defined as "superior" tone is subjective and can easily vary from person to person.
So, with that subjectivity in mind, which specific basses have "superior" tone is essentially a crapshoot and it has nothing to do with "mojo" at all.
I think MOJO IS the crapshoot, right? When your subjective taste meets an instrument that hits all of your subjective buttons in terms of feel and tone, which physical properties may be the result of manufacturing defects or drift in tolerances. When I was looking at Jazz basses years ago I played seven of them in Sam Ash. The two that had MOJO (feel and tone I like) were an SX fretless and a MIM Jazz. They played well, felt comfy, and sounded great. The MIM in particular had the tone in spades. I sat with it and thought "Now THIS is a Jazz bass". It was gone when I went back to buy it.
It is easier to use word MOJO as short hand, than to type or say all that stuff about physical tolerances in manufacturing and subjective feeling on tone/feel. To be honest I don't really use the word MOJO unless I'm talking about the Slim Harpo song.Feel and tone you like isn't mojo, it's just feel and tone you like.
There's no such thing as instrument "mojo" somebody simply made it up.
This part, at least, is proven and known. But it pertains to spruce soundboards, at around 30 years of playing, the cellular structure has "set" and is influenced by those decades of vibration positively. Some luthiers have set up sound chambers to accelerate the process for later use in their acoustic builds.I remember reading a few years ago that the wood changes some from years of string vibrations. Is it true? If it is it could lead to a little mojo.
And of course, a solid P-bass could be made out of aged cheese and still sound good...if it has the mojo...
I don't believe in that definition.Mojo? I've always understood that to mean some kind of "vibe" that has been imparted into the instrument. Usually because some great musician (doesn't has to be a famous one) played it for years. And somehow that will come out through "you" when you play it. That being said... No, I don't believe in "Mojo".
I'm surprised at how many people are taking the interpretation of mojo to be some sort of magical, mystical, whimsical thing.
To me it's none of that. It's just a random "awesome sauce" that the instrument has, for whatever reason. It's completely subjective to the person who's playing it that makes it incredible. And because of that awesome sauce, it feels better, plays better and SOUNDS better.
I used to work at a Mexican food restaurant as a teenager and I remember occasionally, I felt like making an enchilada with just a touch more sauce, just because, and customer would say "man, best enchilada ever". I think the same is true for anything in manufacturing, some kid in the assembly line feels like giving the pickup one more wind just to please one lucky customer. Or maybe the luthier woke up on the right side of the bed and decides to spend just an extra 5min on a particular build (even if it's already to spec). It's those kinds of things that I'm sure amount to Mojo-ness!