Thanks for the info.Good eyes!
I have two sets of pre-cut boards left for the 1/2" larger (in each dimension) Thunderchild 212 cabs, and then when I cut more boards, it will go down to the same size as the Hathor 212.
When I originally designed the Thunderchild 212 cab, I was trying to get as much internal volume as I could cram into a shipping box with internal dimensions of 36" x 16" x 16", allowing for some protective foam padding. By the time I did the Hathor 212 cab, the little Hathor 1203 had shown me that I needn't be so concerned with maxing out the internal volume. Since then I have prototyped a Kappalite 112 cab with even smaller internal volume than the Hathor 1203.
The Hathor 212 and the slightly larger Thunderchild 212 model within a small fraction of a dB of one another on the low end. If we keep the ports the same (which we do in this case), as the box volume goes up a little, so does the tuning frequency, so the -3 dB point shifts very little. And we have plenty of excursion so a small shift in the tuning frequency is inconsequential.
If either cab turned out to be a tad bit tighter as opposed to deeper sounding that wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit, but it sounds like the difference wouldn't show up in a double-blind test (especially since I'm double-deaf - according to my S.O.).


