• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AudioKinesis Cabs Part VI...

The comparisons to the active speakers seems unfair to not include the fact that the amps you guys use are uber high end bass specific amps. Interesting nonetheless. The piano player in my jazz group uses I think the K10 or 8. Sounds great, but something in the set up (either the QSC or keyboard) never has enough dynamic headroom for my tastes.

Thanks for the gig report compared to the Baers.

Duke, was there talk of doing a 21203 or 21223? Is the TC212 the only 212 in your lineup right now?
 
Duke, was there talk of doing a 21203 or 21223? Is the TC212 the only 212 in your lineup right now?

I don't have a Hathor 212 officially in the pipeline at this point; right now the TC212 is the only 212 I have. My near future looks pretty busy right now, as I just vastly increased the number of models I carry, so it might be a few months before I get to it. That being said, a post like yours that implies "hey this would be interesting" moves things a bit closer to happening.

Okay this question is for everyone... assuming that I only want to add one new Hathor cab over the summer, would you rather see a revision of the 1544 in 8 ohms with the stock Kappalite 3015 (non-LF); or a 4-ohm 212 with a pair of stock 3012LF's? Not sure exactly what the top end driver complement will be in either case, that would be decided later. So, Hathor style 115 or 212? Or yawn? (Yawn is okay; I'll work on other stuff).

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
A 21 with an 8 and three 6's sounds very interesting...
Ha!

Actually, I did look at 21" woofers for the insane sub-contra-bass cab, which is down the road a bit. They cost a lot (especially with neo magnets) and they weigh a lot (even with neo magnets).

Depends on the size/weight of the 212. One attraction to the 1203 is supreme portability, and frankly I find it easier to schlep two 25 lb cabs than a single 40 lb cab. But some prefer single cab to modular.
I'd estimate mid to upper 40's for a Hathor 212, so even less weight savings that you were hoping. Like if we doubled up on drivers going from the 1203 to the 212, we'd have almost double the box weight (only saving the weight of the top board) and close to double the crossover weight (yes the inductor values would scale down, but then the wire gauge would have to go thicker because we'd need to double the power handling).
 
I was going by some of the ultralight 2-12s (CN212, Tecamp S212) which are low-mid 40s. The Baer is a bit over 50lbs iirc. For me the modularity is king, but for guys doing a lot of louder gigs where a 1-12 would rarely cut it I could see the attraction.

What about a 1263 in a taller box that crossed the 12 over lower and went into TC112 range, with paper 6" and 3"? Or 6" and small horn crossed over sort of high (4k?)? Sort of a cross between TC and Hathor - you get the more present mids (with a switch to smooth back to "flat") and a bit lower extension.

hey, you asked :D
 
I'm very biased toward the vertical 212 form factor. I had a pair of Baers, and honestly, most of the time I could have done with one, so it was a single 12 - 212 in a way (magic!), but then it's really squat. Granted, the mid makes that less of an issue sonically, and your clever Hathor scheme even more so. Then, lugging two boxes, to me, is more of a pain then rolling a single cab in and out. Same goes for a single 15 vs. 212, IMO.

I'm not really in the market, TBH, so feel free to ignore me, too. I just enjoy watching the state of the art advance right here on TB.
 
Definitely not scientific, but after following the various 2x12 &/or 2 x 1x12 threads, it seems like maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the consumers out there prefer a single 2x12 over the modular option, as long as the 2x12 is reasonably schlepable.
The Bergantino HD212 vs. 2x HD112 divide might be close to 50/50%. but only b/c (imo) the HD212 is less schlepable @ 79 lbs.
That leaves you to consider how many prefer a 1x15 over a 2x12 & the details of implementing the tone you're after.

I realize that there are only a few people at this point that have a pair of the H1203, but I'm wondering if any have tried an L - stack where the bottom cab is on its side with the HF driver end pointed towards the rest of the band & the top cab stacked over the bottom cab woofer in a vertical orientation?
Seems like it might facilitate sound-spread on stage by some degree.
 
Articulation is very similar to the Baers, with maybe just a tad less low extension but a little more low-mid heft. I think the 1203 reacts to slap a bit better than the Baer, but part of that is the bass and the walnut body (which tends to compress). I'm not sure that a single cab would have carried this room whereas the Baer will no problem. I'd expect that as the Baer is almost twice the size. From a logistic standpoint, the 1203 is freakin' perfect. Small footprint, easy carry, and great dispersion so I can hear even if I'm right on top of the cab. It frees up a bunch of space in the back of my car (I leave one cab in the car all the time).

I also was using less bass eq on Monique with the 1203 than I typically would with the Baer - due to having a bit more low-mid heft baked in. I still need to work with the cab and find out how it takes eq and technique. But so far, it is great. I'm not sure I have any "gee, I would change this..." comments yet. Which is pretty rare for me as I'm somewhat of a pita about gear.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Recording sounds good. When the baers first came out I remember kjung comparing them to the AE210 as being very similar but with more low end. So I'm wondering, since you also have experience with the 210, if the 1203 might be considered something like a 25lb AE210?

And as far as a 212 version, if I was going big I'd go 1855. Just so I could say I had an 18 inch rig. My inner 17 year old rocker wants two.
 
Okay this question is for everyone... assuming that I only want to add one new Hathor cab over the summer, would you rather see a revision of the 1544 in 8 ohms with the stock Kappalite 3015 (non-LF); or a 4-ohm 212 with a pair of stock 3012LF's? Not sure exactly what the top end driver complement will be in either case, that would be decided later. So, Hathor style 115 or 212? Or yawn? (Yawn is okay; I'll work on other stuff).

For me the 1544 would be a standalone cab and therefore 4 ohms would be greatly preferred -- especially since the TC115 is now 8 ohms-only. But I'd say do whatever's the most fun for you. Link Removed
 
I was going by some of the ultralight 2-12s (CN212, Tecamp S212) which are low-mid 40s. The Baer is a bit over 50lbs iirc. For me the modularity is king, but for guys doing a lot of louder gigs where a 1-12 would rarely cut it I could see the attraction.
What about a 1263 in a taller box that crossed the 12 over lower and went into TC112 range, with paper 6" and 3"? Or 6" and small horn crossed over sort of high (4k?)? Sort of a cross between TC and Hathor - you get the more present mids (with a switch to smooth back to "flat") and a bit lower extension.
hey, you asked :D
I think the ultralight 212's you mention probably use Deltalite-class woofers. Very fine woofers for their weight, which is about 2 pounds less than the Kappalies. So I start out with a 4-pound/cab weight disadvantage, and then if we start adding kilowatt-capable inductors...

Your idea of a 1263 is interesting, and I hadn't thought of that configuration. Weight and would cost go up significantly, and while it might not seem like it, I do try to keep the performance/cost ratio decent. But that's an interesting idea, one that I'll have to mull over a bit.

I do have plans to at least prototype a cab with 6" and 3" drivers and a big woofer, but that's down the road a bit.

As to a new model, how about a 4-8" vertical column with a couple of your 3" drivers in the middle of the stack?

Well there's only one 8" woofer that I really warm up to, and that's the Faital 8PR200. Beautiful little driver, with air-moving capability competitive with many 10's (Faital measures x-max with an imo optimistic yardstick imo, but this one still has remarkable x-max even with a conservative yardstick). This is a fantastic little woofer for upright bass in part because of its midrange smoothness, but I'm now starting to prefer a bit of "growly" for electric bass, which I can make switch-off-able.

Unfortunately the 8PR100 is really expensive. I could (and do) build a 212 for less money that would be lighter, less expensive, and more capable.

I'm very biased toward the vertical 212 form factor. I had a pair of Baers, and honestly, most of the time I could have done with one, so it was a single 12 - 212 in a way (magic!), but then it's really squat. Granted, the mid makes that less of an issue sonically, and your clever Hathor scheme even more so. Then, lugging two boxes, to me, is more of a pain then rolling a single cab in and out. Same goes for a single 15 vs. 212, IMO.

Thank you, I hadn't appreciated how many people prefer the tall form factor of a 212 vs a squatty-body cab. Sounds like there needs to be at least one tallish Hathor cab, and 212 makes sense.

Definitely not scientific, but after following the various 2x12 &/or 2 x 1x12 threads, it seems like maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the consumers out there prefer a single 2x12 over the modular option, as long as the 2x12 is reasonably schlepable.

That sounds about right. I figured the uber-compact 1203 would have a wider appeal so that's what I focused on, but obviously there's interest in a 212 variant as well.

I realize that there are only a few people at this point that have a pair of the H1203, but I'm wondering if any have tried an L - stack where the bottom cab is on its side with the HF driver end pointed towards the rest of the band & the top cab stacked over the bottom cab woofer in a vertical orientation?
Seems like it might facilitate sound-spread on stage by some degree.

Yes, there are options a 2x112 stack gives you that a 212 doesn't, and the ability to improvise your coverage patterns as needed is one of them.

And as far as a 212 version, if I was going big I'd go 1855. Just so I could say I had an 18 inch rig. My inner 17 year old rocker wants two.

The 1855 and Hathor 212 would sort of cover the same territory, with the 1855 doing so in a more bada$$ way. The 1855 already has a fairly upper-mid-aggressive voicing, so I could let it cover that niche, and then be a bit more weight/cost conscious on the 212. Just thinking out loud here.

Note to your inner 17 year old: The 1855 can be done in 8 ohms, in which case all your wildest dreams can come true.

For me the 1544 would be a standalone cab and therefore 4 ohms would be greatly preferred -- especially since the TC115 is now 8 ohms-only. But I'd say do whatever's the most fun for you. Link Removed

The original Hathor 1544 uses the Faital 15PR400, which I've decided is a bit smoother than what I want. The Kappalite 3015 (non-LF) has some upper-mid emphasis that I like, which can be switchable, offering two different voicings in one cab. Anyway that's my thinking at this stage.
 
I think the ultralight 212's you mention probably use Deltalite-class woofers. Very fine woofers for their weight, which is about 2 pounds less than the Kappalies. So I start out with a 4-pound/cab weight disadvantage, and then if we start adding kilowatt-capable inductors...

Your idea of a 1263 is interesting, and I hadn't thought of that configuration. Weight and would cost go up significantly, and while it might not seem like it, I do try to keep the performance/cost ratio decent. But that's an interesting idea, one that I'll have to mull over a bit.

I wasn't suggesting you shoot for the ultra light weight. I'm not a fan of those ultralight 2-12s. Just figured it would be somewhere in the 40s.

I've been doing some A/B with the ML112 and the 1203. More similar that different - it is an interesting comparison and I want to get stuebig's ears in the room as well. Definitely different character of the lows (due to the box size I think) and the upper mids (due to the 6" vs. 3"). There are things I think the 6" brings to the table, and there are things the 3" brings as well - hence me suggesting them paired to the 12". I could see something that is 14"x14" by like 23" to fit them, and include the open mid chamber - that is the drummer's best friend. For me the shallower footprint of your cabs have always been a major plus.


Yes, there are options a 2x112 stack gives you that a 212 doesn't, and the ability to improvise your coverage patterns as needed is one of them.

I've run a pair with the bottom cab pointed towards the crowd and the top cab spun 90 degrees and pointing at the drummers ear. That seems to help keep certain guys a little better in line ;)
 
"Anyway that's my thinking at this stage."
Duke, you do mighty fine thinking and express your thoughts clearly and understandably for a wide audience.

Thank you sir! I do my best to at least talk a good game!

I wasn't suggesting you shoot for the ultra light weight. I'm not a fan of those ultralight 2-12s. Just figured it would be somewhere in the 40s.

No problem, I just wanted to explain for anyone who was wondering why my cabs are a bit heavier. Air-moved-per-pound and power-handling-per-pound (both thermal and mechanical) and sound-per-pound, I think mine are competitive, but they are only ho-hum when it comes to cone-area-per-pound.

I've been doing some A/B with the ML112 and the 1203. More similar that different - it is an interesting comparison and I want to get stuebig's ears in the room as well. Definitely different character of the lows (due to the box size I think) and the upper mids (due to the 6" vs. 3"). There are things I think the 6" brings to the table, and there are things the 3" brings as well - hence me suggesting them paired to the 12". I could see something that is 14"x14" by like 23" to fit them, and include the open mid chamber - that is the drummer's best friend. For me the shallower footprint of your cabs have always been a major plus.

Yes, I made trade-offs in going for the compact end of the spectrum. Roger's larger cab with that magnificent Faital 6" mid does a lot of things very well, and I deliberately steered clear of copying him - what he's doing is being done well.

Just for fun, you might try running the 1203 stack with the port plugged on one cab. I liked some things about that configuration, and the woofers have enough x-max that I don't think you'll run into fartout. You might get a bit more thermal compression at the end of a set from the sealed cab, if you're pushing them hard. But if you have a few spare minutes next time you try 'em both in practice, give it a shot and see what you think.
 
Last edited:
You make a compelling case for a pair of 1203's. Would a Hathor 212 use a pair of 3's or 5" mid. Also, I know the 1855 goes really deep but does it punch as hard or have the mid presence of a 212? An 1855 Hathor with a Gallien Krueger MB Fusion 800 seems like it would be a real primal, raw meat, take no prisoners rig.
 
Your idea of a 1263 is interesting, and I hadn't thought of that configuration. Weight and would cost go up significantly, and while it might not seem like it, I do try to keep the performance/cost ratio decent. But that's an interesting idea, one that I'll have to mull over a bit.

I do have plans to at least prototype a cab with 6" and 3" drivers and a big woofer, but that's down the road a bit.

Is there anything to be gained if the 1203 covers the same range (bandwidth) as the 1263, and is more or less equally smooth, as the 1263? The 6 would have better dispersion than the 12. Would the 6 be a little more articulate in the mids than the 12 covering the same range? For 'big woofers', could a 6 be found that would have the right response peak to produce the desired growl for the cab?