I've been getting pm's to further describe my 1544, so I thought I'd just copy/past one of my replies here for anyone else that was interested:
I cant think of any smaller/lite-weight cab that compares very favorably to my NV610's low-mid punch and tight, compressed bottom end.
Although the 1544 can be very punchy, it goes both lower and higher, so it would just naturally have less-pronounced low-mids.
The 1544 simply gives a brutally honest reproduction of what your bass, effects and amp gives.
Kinda like what a really good set of studio monitors do.
I dont think the 1544 cab itself gives as much grit as my NV, but Its not as loud, so it allows me to crank my tube power sections up much higher, where I get a much better sounding type of compressed grit, but at a much more realistic volume-level that I can actually use on the stages I gig. (w/o pissing off the soundman)
When I started beta testing this cab, I told Duke I compare all cabs against how well my NV610 blends with my bands mix on stage. I told him that several of the 1544 lower-register notes were boomy and much louder, and that's what I typically dont like about most ported cabs I've tried to gig.
At that point I shipped the cab back to Duke for further mods. He told me he was going to try to make it work more like my sealed cab. And when I got it back from him... It definitely did!
Now I get a very even volume and heft/thickness to most all the notes, up and all the way down my fretboard, just like my NV610 does.
I cant say If you'll prefer the 1544 or not, but I can say Duke has a very fair return policy
kringle77 said:Hey man, how do you think the Hathor cab compares to the NV610 in terms of low mid punch and tight, compressed bottom end? Is their any grit to the sound or is it more clean and neutral? Thanks. Chris
I cant think of any smaller/lite-weight cab that compares very favorably to my NV610's low-mid punch and tight, compressed bottom end.
Although the 1544 can be very punchy, it goes both lower and higher, so it would just naturally have less-pronounced low-mids.
The 1544 simply gives a brutally honest reproduction of what your bass, effects and amp gives.
Kinda like what a really good set of studio monitors do.
I dont think the 1544 cab itself gives as much grit as my NV, but Its not as loud, so it allows me to crank my tube power sections up much higher, where I get a much better sounding type of compressed grit, but at a much more realistic volume-level that I can actually use on the stages I gig. (w/o pissing off the soundman)
When I started beta testing this cab, I told Duke I compare all cabs against how well my NV610 blends with my bands mix on stage. I told him that several of the 1544 lower-register notes were boomy and much louder, and that's what I typically dont like about most ported cabs I've tried to gig.
At that point I shipped the cab back to Duke for further mods. He told me he was going to try to make it work more like my sealed cab. And when I got it back from him... It definitely did!
Now I get a very even volume and heft/thickness to most all the notes, up and all the way down my fretboard, just like my NV610 does.
I cant say If you'll prefer the 1544 or not, but I can say Duke has a very fair return policy