Anyone know the origins of the change in tail pieces on the Ampeg Baby Bass? from all the way down to the bottom of the body to the style that most baby bass makers use today the the "Y" looking tail piece?
Thanks in advance..
Rich
I don't know why Ampeg made the change. I now have the earlier version without the tailpiece extension with the logo (the Ampeg logo is on the scroll headstock on my Baby Bass). Maybe Ampeg just wanted a more traditional look.
You have to be careful when ordering strings for the Baby Bass. I used to have a later model B.B. When I ordered a set of LaBella strings through Gollihur Music and I kept receiving strings that were too long. The retailer gave up on helping me and gave me a phone number to deal with La Bella directly. It took weeks for me to finally get the strings in the correct length - after convincing the LaBella rep. that I had an actual stock Ampeg and that their strings were too long. After the ordeal was over, I realized that LaBella probably had the lengths for the early Ampegs that did not have the tailpiece extension.
Also - richrod - My name is also Rich and I am also from Orange County (Central Valley - I am in AZ now) and I have a Baby Bass
