TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I kind of like it with the open E, however. I noticed McCartney would do that often, though...play the high 'E' instead of the low 'E' - like in I Saw Her Standing There, Money (That's What I Want), etc. I always thought that was kind of strange...why have a bass if you're going to play in guitar range? I thought maybe because his Hofner apparently had intonation problems, but I doubt it. If that were the case, then playing the low 'A' riffs would be problematic too.
I kind of like it with the open E, however. I noticed McCartney would do that often, though...play the high 'E' instead of the low 'E' - like in I Saw Her Standing There, Money (That's What I Want), etc. I always thought that was kind of strange...why have a bass if you're going to play in guitar range? I thought maybe because his Hofner apparently had intonation problems, but I doubt it. If that were the case, then playing the low 'A' riffs would be problematic too.
learning 3/4ths of the song is not "creative interpretation", it's just sucking.
plus one!I find it interesting that so many people are saying how boring it is to "play what's written" when classical players are required to do just that to excel.
I'm confused, by playing it "right" do you mean, note for note the same as on the album? I've been to a lot of shows, I mean, not as many as some of you no doubt, but in the hundreds, and I would say 90% of those shows, the bass player didn't play what he/she laid down in the studio. And that's ok with me, I don't want to hear the studio version, I want to hear them play it live.
I can understand if you are talking about totally playing off-key, or playing unison with a guitar/keys part when you should be playing something counter to that, but I don't buy into the note-for note deal.
Also, if you are covering a tune that say, someone in your band can nail, but has some insane bassline that you will be able to play in say 10 years, what's wrong with simplifying it down a little bit, if most of the bassline is made up of fills and crazy stuff, just lay into the background a bit, pick out the main groove of what the bass player is doing and run with it.
For example the guitair player I play with can *tear up* the vocals and guitar for Johnny B. Goode, but I A.) cannot play upright bass. and B.) cannot play nearly as well as Willie Dixon (I've only been playing about 10 months) So, I just play some thumpy walks on top of it, and people really get into it. Sure, that bassline kicks an amazing amount of butt, but I'm just not there yet, so I say, if people are hoooting and hollering and having a good time, it's good enough for Rock and Roll.
And the 200 wedding party guests would never know the difference as long as the drummer keeps a solid meter.
Pink Floyd's "Another Brick in the Wall" suite - I don't hear it often but when I do hear it, it's always butchered.
The Meter's "Cissy Strut"
James Brown's "Super Bad" (BTW- that was an upright doing that)
that's stupid. playing bass lines note for note off records isn't making music. sure learn the parts just to develop your ears, and your concept, but why play them out like that? who benefits? those notes might be the "perfect" notes. but they are perfect for that performance. The music will be better in the moment. the crowd knows when great music is made in the moment and they respond to that more than nailing the correct lick variation in bar 106.
I find it interesting that so many people are saying how boring it is to "play what's written" when classical players are required to do just that to excel.
^^^ Truth
Although I've been trying my best to figure out the 100% "For Whom the Bell Tolls" and "Seek and Destroy"![]()
All Right Now" (Free) Tough to do correctly (apparently)
Good one!