it seems like it struggles to find enough new content to justify issue after issue decades later.
...and ^^^this is precisely why I let my subscription lapse decades ago.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
it seems like it struggles to find enough new content to justify issue after issue decades later.
Yeah...they did cover some of the same guys over & over & over...woulda been nice seeing different p!ayers on the cover. "Different" = players that shoulda been covered vs. players with an agent that struck a deal for their client....and ^^^this is precisely why I let my subscription lapse decades ago.
Yeah...they did cover some of the same guys over & over & over...woulda been nice seeing different p!ayers on the cover. "Different" = players that shoulda been covered vs. players with an agent that struck a deal for their client.
Would a Jerry Peek cover issue sold as well as a Fieldy cover issue? No? Whose fault is that?
I used to look forward to their Album & Book reviews. Pretty sure I was in the minority on that because they lost those 2-3 pages for years.
Probably not possible: Reprint some of the early Will Lee, Dave Larue, Anthony Jackson workshops. Hell, go back & reprint the Chuck Rainey columns from '70s-era Guitar Player, too.
![]()
I would love that.I think it would serve Bassplayer well if they dedicated a page or two of ever issue to some underserved legacy players or a where are they now page every now and then. A lot of the demographic that still buys magazines are older and have been around a while, just saying.