• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

basscyclist thread picture thread

The mustard is blooming!
IMG_20230218_154112.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: pie_man_25
No bloomin' mustard here today...
View attachment 4978066
Snowstorm today in Kingston. That ride was nice.

2023 Surly= 2016 Diamondback. ;) Mine came with a flat bar, which I switched to a swept bar. My best bike for longer rides. Surly probably has higher grade components.
View attachment 4978064
It really does seem to share a lot with older mountain bikes... A lot of surlys do. I think in my situation I really don't need it but it looks fun.
 
Snowstorm today in Kingston. That ride was nice.

It really does seem to share a lot with older mountain bikes... A lot of surlys do. I think in my situation I really don't need it but it looks fun.
Indeed, I've been eyeing a Cross Check frame for a long time, same deal. The difference is that the Cross Check would accommodate my weird needs for gear hubs, single speed, and whatnot. But I need another bike like I need a hole in the head.
 
I've been riding a Surly Cross Check as my primary road bike since 2006. I'm very satisfied with it.

First thing to keep in mind is that although by today's standards of plastic bikes and 220 lb guys in stretch Lycra it'd be considered a "long wheelbase, long chainstay, relaxed angle" bike, if you look at the actual specs it lines up very closely with a late 70s Raleigh Professional or an early 80s Mercian Olympic, both of which were considered high quality road racing bikes at the time.

For actual grownups who enjoy riding a bike, as opposed to millennials who want to show off their latest plastic bike and expensive gear as they wobble down the bike path at 40 rpm in the traditional wrong gear, I would highly recomment the Cross-Check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jefenator
Indeed, I've been eyeing a Cross Check frame for a long time, same deal. The difference is that the Cross Check would accommodate my weird needs for gear hubs, single speed, and whatnot. But I need another bike like I need a hole in the head.
I think on the whole the Cross Check is probably the better/more versatile bike/frame, I think the one I posted is probably as close as they'll get to something like a Trek FX or Giant Escape type of frame - a generally capable "all-rounder" hybrid that isn't too expensive (at 1500ish CAD I'll say not too expensive compared to the rest of what Surly sells) and could give a newer potential buyer/commuter a good feeling, reliable ride to get around town in, and just capable enough off road to go through some hiking trails and get into a bit of trouble on. I guess a gateway bike. Don't ask me about geometry too much, but looking at charts it's not *too* far off of my trek 830, except probably with more stack.

Except instead of the Trek or Giant, it's got a surly branded steel frame that's due to last a lifetime or two and probably weighs a bit more. It looks nicer than my CCM but since all three seem to have similar geometry and are steel it's hard to justify at a higher cost than the total cost of ownership of both of my other bikes so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fdeck
Well, if we're talking about a 4 lb. frame and fork vs. a 3 lb frame and fork ridden by me, who ought to weigh 150 lbs but actually weighs 185 lbs, where is the greatest weight reduction potential? Hmmmmm?

Then add on a pair of 36 spoke three cross wheels that need to be trued about once every two years, and 32 mm tires, and a full tool kit under the saddle, and a pump, and two 16 oz, water bottles, and a Brooks B67 saddle with springs, and NOW tell me how important that plastic frame is to you?
 
Well, if we're talking about a 4 lb. frame and fork vs. a 3 lb frame and fork ridden by me, who ought to weigh 150 lbs but actually weighs 185 lbs, where is the greatest weight reduction potential? Hmmmmm?

Then add on a pair of 36 spoke three cross wheels that need to be trued about once every two years, and 32 mm tires, and a full tool kit under the saddle, and a pump, and two 16 oz, water bottles, and a Brooks B67 saddle with springs, and NOW tell me how important that plastic frame is to you?
Say what you will, a bike is a bike - it's not the bike you ride, it's the fun you have riding it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Inky13
Well, if we're talking about a 4 lb. frame and fork vs. a 3 lb frame and fork ridden by me, who ought to weigh 150 lbs but actually weighs 185 lbs, where is the greatest weight reduction potential? Hmmmmm?

Then add on a pair of 36 spoke three cross wheels that need to be trued about once every two years, and 32 mm tires, and a full tool kit under the saddle, and a pump, and two 16 oz, water bottles, and a Brooks B67 saddle with springs, and NOW tell me how important that plastic frame is to you?
It just occurred to me that you might have thought I was trying to crap talk the cross check.

Not at all, I think that surly stuff occupies a pretty rad niche that I'd probably have bought by now if I didn't already have two bikes... Both of them steel.

I was mostly trying to compare the new surly preamble to what I figured was the closest comparable thing - some other brands have relatively affordable hybrid bikes that they tend to market as a mix of commuter and adventure bikes and I think surly is trying to do that, but in their own way. If the preamble came out this time last year, I probably would have bought a frame as it seems pretty close to perfect for me - but I have since bought an '88 trek 830 frame and assembled that from a number of parts and posted about it pretty extensively. At this point, as rad as the surly is, and I'm sure the cross trek is also an awesome bike, my needs are pretty well met.

As far as weight is concerned on my end - I think the last big ride I went on I packed a couple beers, four litres of water, a jar of peanut butter and a spoon into a bag and onto a rear rack on a high tensile frame. I'm hardly fussy and I'm almost sorry I came off that way.

Bikes are rad, steel is rad, carbon is way out of my price range but I'm sure it's great too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fdeck and Crawforde
I recently got a new B17.

A few observations-

they finally come in a sort of usable box instead of the "almost a box" they used to come in.

This one is much harder than the last one I got- but I *may* have over-conditioned that one when I first got it.

But it'll break in nicely.

Brooks 2023 by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
 

Latest posts