• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Beginner Financial Investing.

Thanks. I totally get the second guessing - I wish I had taken more gains off the table before the proverbial poop hit the fan. :(

It will be interesting to see how Humpty Dumpty (our financial system) gets put back together again. I'd like it to last more than 10 years before the next meltdown. :rollno:
 
Great post, that previous one of yours.

I take a slightly contrarian view in replying to this subsequent post of yours.


Thanks. I totally get the second guessing - I wish I had taken more gains off the table before the proverbial poop hit the fan. :(

I suggest you still have time before the poop hits the fan, but not much time.

Too many people are talking like the market crash is over. That's not at all the case.

Recall a couple months ago I stated people were about to lose at least double what they had lost so far? Obviously that happened in short order. I'll say it again. People are about to lose at least double what they've lost so far, if they persist in remaining unhedged, thinking the bad times are over, that market exposure is in any way safe/conservative, and/or that the government interventions done and proposed so far will do anything but make things worse as has been the case all along thus far.

As I've said all along, stay hedged or stay out.

Are you on my email list? My strident edicts to buy nothing, or to only buy very cautiously with the realistic expectation to soon be down 50% on those puchases still stand. But that's for an audience that has at worst broken even on the way down, or even made good money as I have. Those that have lost money I've been pretty strident should stay out entirely.


It will be interesting to see how Humpty Dumpty (our financial system) gets put back together again. I'd like it to last more than 10 years before the next meltdown. :rollno:

I think you mean "if" it gets put back together again, and especially "if" it even vaguely resembles a free & functional market which given the current fast hard push towards socialism is increasingly unlikely. The way this is gonna shake out, it'll be a long time before people are keen on "capitalism" again. Pity they never gave it a chance to begin with - a real money system, letting the stupid and greedy take their lumps, etc.

But that's what you get with a government run by Wall St. cronies. For example, Goldman Sachs was at the forefront of causing this mess and you have their recent/former CEO at the forefront of supposedly fixing it by funnelling hundreds of billion$ of taxpayer dollars to, among others, his old firm, despite the facts that these fools couldn't see it coming, denied it was coming all long, and that any credible/qualified observer will tell you it's the worst "solution" possible. If that ain't a scam ... ? Take a long look at how many ex-Harvard and current & ex-Wall St. people are at the highest levels of power and lobbying, how long they've been there, who stands to benefit from the current interventions, and do the math. The bottom line won't be pretty, if you add it up right.

It if were fiction, it'd have to be labelled comedy/farce. Instead it's all too real and it's simple human nature. When they're about to shut off the free beer taps, you take what you can get and gak down as much as you can before heading out. Put another way - when the easy money and power is about to get taken from you, you fill up your bank accounts with whatever you can grab, under whatever pretense you can grab it, before heading out. The populace is too busy with self-pity to do or say anything about it plus, deep down, sheeple secretly love to get fleeced.

Ultimately though, people do fairly have themselves to blame. Too much comparing a new plasma vs. LCD to be purchased with their home "equity" loan to stop and realize what's truly going on. One of the greatest and most obvious money-making opportunities in recent history has not only passed most people by but caused them to lose a great deal. On the bright side, the opportunity is still fully opon us.
 
I seemed to have missed this post, Smash, so I'll answer now, a bit late but perhaps the next time you check in you can respond if necessary ...

We (my wife & I) have what could only be viewed as very conservative investments. Nothing truely high risk, no day trading or anything like that .... most of what we have is in what would normally be looked at as "safe" investments, i.e., blended mutual funds, 401K's, Govt bonds etc. Things with a slower rate of return. We also have heavily invested in ourselves, specifically agressively paying down our mortgage, eliminating ALL debt beyond the minor balance left on the mortgage, maintaining our vehicles in pristine condition to further the life of the vehicle and not have to buy "new", etc. Additionally, we have some real estate holdings that are very long term investments that we aren't currently too worried about (bought them very low and even with this serious market correction we are still very much on the positive side of these properties).

With the realization that any investment is a risk of sorts, we believe that we have limited our exposure to the degree possible that a moderate return on the investments could be realized. As is painfully evident in this economy, even the most conservative of investments has experienced a hit of 30% or more.

Will it come back? Hopefully, but I sure don't know that for a fact. We have to assume that it won't, and we now need to change direction to attempt to recoup the "losses" we have experienced recently. Part of being a conservative investor (IMO) is to not sit back and "hope for the best". Had the economy simply leveled off rather than dropped so precipitously, our gains over the past 15 years could have been re-addressed into even more conservative vehicles. But now, we must look different approaches to solidify our theoretical retirement years.

This is all very responsbile. You're quite correct to focus on paying down debt. Even during bull markets I've always stressed that retirement monies should *NOT* be exposed to the markets. I still emphatically say so, especially for anyone even near retirement.

Instead, people's stock market profits should be set aside to buy hard assets - their home, diversification of currency, perhaps some gold, and funding their retirement. In other words the opposite of what many "experts" advise. And of course most people have only stock market losses over time, which underscores why they shouldn't be adding money to their "investment" accounts much less adding retirement money.

I put it at 50/50 that we'll soon see another severe market drop. Fankly I put it much higher, as the markets have dropped several hundred points while I typed these two replies, but 50/50 odds should be more than enough to make you stop and think very seriously about the risks still present in owning equities. It is not my intent to scare you, but it is my intent to have people realize that all this "stocks are cheap, it's crazy to sell now" crap is as much total BS now as it was 1 or 2 or 12 or 72 months ago. it is always pure BS, as Enron, World Com, Lehman, Bear Stearns, Fannie, Freddie, Ambak, MBI, etc. etc. etc. - or any stock over the past few weeks - so clearly illustrate. Always be hedged. 1987, 9/11, etc. happen with regularity, never mind the natural tendency for markets to revert to the mean.

Is it too stressful and uncertain guessing/betting which way things will go, and if any bounce or slide is temporary or the start of a larger move? Exactly. So don't expose serious/retirement money to it, esecpially if you (I mean people in general not you speciflcally) have debts to pay.

As far as the economy preferably having levelled off, for the future keep in mind Newtonian physics about "equal and opposite reactions". Applied to the markets, any bubble bursting happens faster than its inflation. Or put another way, market corrections are at least as fast and severe as the frauds that the bulls ran on. Consider the current markets in light of the housing/credit boom, or the tech crash in light of the dot-com mania and you'll see it's true. Those were massive frauds - as is the case any time you hear about a "new paradigm" - and in this case the fraud is still ramping up as per recent government actions.

Cash doesn't pay much now, but those who still have cash left when the inflation comes will be enjoying fat interest payments that should cover inflationary increases and monetray collapse, while those who lost all their cash/assets/investment will be enjoying nothing at all. Plan ahead.


We have always tried to be conservative and handle our finances in a manner that limited the risks .... in other words, work a lot harder for what we have but sleep peacefully knowing that we wouldn't lose it all on a gamble. And because neither one of us is well-versed enough to fully manage our own accounts, we engaged professionals that worked for us to manage things in a conservative way. And yet, even with that due caution, we have found ourselves seeing a downturn.

Most "experts" and "professionals", especially those likely to be retained by non-millionaires, are complete hacks, frauds and/or rookies. Unless you're being advised/managed by someone that's beaten the markets consistently over time and is proud to prove it, and ideally has at least once lost everything or close to it, then you're getting bad and even dangerous advice.

A real pro advisor should sound a lot like me, and should have you hedged either way. If not, then compare his record the past few years to the public one I've got here or to those of the resources I've recommended. If his comes even vaguely close please email me the name and number as I'd like to hire them. If not, then why pay for worse than you can get for free?

Even if you find a real pro, consider how utterly collapsed some funds are that are managed by what until recently were investing icons such as Miller, Pzena, Whitman, Kerkorkian, etc. This even includes guys who predicted the collapse and were heavily short stocks like Lehman and MBI.


Please understand that you needn't much time or smarts to take charge of your money and to control it far better than some impersonal wet-behind-the-ears advisor can, or some broker who's main concern is dumping his firm's worthless paper into your account. There are plenty of excellent references in this thread, including many that are free, as well as this thread itself. All of these, if heeded prudently within a hedged portfolio, would have had you safe & sound, if not profiting very well, during the market slide as well as during the bull market which preceded it. Win/win. Compounded.


If nothing else, simply never ever hold or buy anything making 1-year lows and you'll avoid most losses by amateurs and pros alike. This paragraph here is the best investment advice anyone can or will ever give you. It will make/save you the most money of any market/investment strategy you'll ever find. So much more so if you know how to short, and you turn short on those that make fresh lows. Just ask anyone that held Enron or Lehman or Fannie or US Dollars how much better off they'd have been if doing so. Or just ask yourself (I mean anyone reading this) how much better off they'd be today if they'd been following this advice the past year or 10.

Beyond that we need to get into knowing when to take profits or reverse losing positions, but that goes beyond the preceeding paragraph in practice and complexity.



Knowing that we are in much better shape than a fairly high majority of our friends/neighbors/family is of little satisfaction to us. Knowing that many of these people ran the very high risk gauntlet and also knowing that there are plans afoot to provide support to them for their bad behavior leaves a very bitter taste. Perhaps I'm being short-sighted, perhaps I'm misunderstanding the larger picture, but all I know is years of being a responsible, hard working dope has resulted in me having to, in essence, bail out others who chose to be far less responsible ....

Yup, I'm p*ssed off .... and open to suggestions or comments ....

You've every right to be p/o'd, and sadly simply voting ain't gonna fix a damn thing. It's gonna get much worse. I've been dead right every time I have said so over the years this thread has been active and I am equally right in saying it today as we'll all soon find out much sooner than we may care to.

Let me be clear in saying I intend, with all my posts, to empower people not to berate or frighten them. However soft language or pillowing my assertions and experience with caveats won't accomplish that.

People have few choices, no matter where the markets go from here. They learn to hedge properly and generally overstand [sic] how the markets really work, or they join the vast majority of punters and "experts" alike who have lost big and will continue to lose big.
 
SMASH said:
Let me be clear in saying I intend, with all my posts, to empower people not to berate or frighten them.
Smash, thanks for the postings and info. Just to be clear, from my own personal viewpoint, I have never taken offense to anything you've taken the time to detail here. Quite the opposite, many of the pieces of info gleaned from this thread have proven to be of great value to me and allowed me to speak/act with much more confidence when dealing with "financial" people .... ;)
 
SMASH said:
I put it at 50/50 that we'll soon see another severe market drop. Fankly I put it much higher, but 50/50 should be enough to make you stop and think. It is not my intent to scare you, but it is my intent to have people realize that all this "stocks are cheap, it's crazy to sell now" crap is as much total BS now as it was 1 or 2 or 12 or 72 months ago.
Dow down 501 points at close. That didn't take long to come true! The Ford market cap is 4.7Billion, and GM is sitting at 3.5 Bn. So you could buy the top two US car manufacturers for $8.7 Bn, total, should you be so inclined. For contrast, look at Toyota and Honda. The two Japanese makers are worth $187 Bn. Also, a regional bank in NJ, Hudson Bancorp, is worth $8.5 Bn, MORE THAN THE TWO BIGGEST US AUTOMAKERS COMBINED! I think both Ford and GM will be gone by Christmas, if not sooner. Even Kerkorian has sold his stake in Ford. Now if that's not a vote of "no confidence, I don't know what is.

Also, the cheapening of oil has hit one of my favorite stocks really hard as well- Suncor Energy, SU. I bought that at $41 and change, rode it up to about $70, and dumped it. Not bad, my first real gain. Today it's at $21. As oil falls, so does investment in alternative energy sources. Smash, remember our discussion a while back about solar? I'm still thinking of going solar at the house, and with the new tax credit of up to 30%, I could almost afford to do it. Solar stocks, though being highly pumped right now by the market genies, aren't exactly producing stellar profits. I think the timing is just a hair off optimal for solar stocks. If oil hung on to $100-120/bbl, they'd make sense. I'm going to continue my patient waiting for the market to drop, probably in November or December.

Water is another thing to keep an eye on- you can't slake the thirst of a nation without it, you can't feed a nation without it, you can't make steel without it, you can't make hydrogen without it, you can't make electricity without it. Look for developments in the "water wars", as states and nations begin squabbling over our declining resources. It's already happening. Pipe companies who are involved in infrastructure projects might be a gainer in the future, as may desalinization plant builders (Mitsubishi, perhaps?)...depends a lot on how things shape up after the elektion.

Gonna be an interesting few months in the muni markets as well, with property tax revenue drying up all over America, and cities and counties going Tango Uniform. Housing bubble effects will likely be felt for a decade or more. Hopefully, property values will meet or exceed where they were just a few months ago in that time, as my payoff date should be right in that area. I bought my home for $92k, it's now worth $88k, I owe $84k on it, and I'm only one year into my loan. I'm working as diligently as I can to pay off my 15-yr mortgage in 9 years or less, to punish my mortgage lender for not granting me one payment of deferral for the month after Ike hit. They said it was all due as normal, principle and interest. OK, fine- you wanna play that game? I'll just have to cheat you out of your interest payments, which I am doing at an accelerating rate! It'll cost them more to do it their way, when all I asked for was to move one payment to the end of my loan to give us breathing room to recover. They could have made money from this arrangement in iterest, but no, they won't grant any exceptions in a Federal Disaster Area. I didn't ask for any other modifications, either. My next-door neighbor called his lender and got two payments deferred, though he only needed one as well. Don't want to work with me? Fine. I'll still get my pound of flesh, and by your rules, as well!
 
Smash, thanks for the postings and info. Just to be clear, from my own personal viewpoint, I have never taken offense to anything you've taken the time to detail here. Quite the opposite, many of the pieces of info gleaned from this thread have proven to be of great value to me and allowed me to speak/act with much more confidence when dealing with "financial" people .... ;)

Deepest thanks for saying so. I am very happy and fortunate to read it. I sincerely wish you the prosperity you've worked hard to deserve.

FWIW, I just finished correcting a bunch of typos and adding a bit more info to my previous post. Some of it may be informative.
 

I do recall the solar discussion. Those might be good when the inflation hits. Depends if the gov't keeps up the subsidies 'cause if not the solars are hopeless unless there's another alt-energy mania.

Real & viable energy alternatives include geothermal and nuclear.

I agree with generally all you've written, esp. in re: water, etc. but I think that's an increasingly long way off. I can envision an infrastructure boom to get the economy going again, but first I think we'll see highways and bridges closed, sewers exploding in the streets, parts of cities without water, etc. Might not get that bad, but before it gets better things will definitely get worse with the only exception being temporary "solutions" that actually make the problem and eventual result worse but delays it.

If you're waiting for a bottom in the market, you might see one soon in the mid-low 7000 range on the DJIA or maybe even on a dip into the high-6000's. It's OK to be buying small amounts here in case it's the bottom, but you've gotta stay hedged with shorts/puts in garbage and there's at least as much greatly overvalue garbage our there as there are supposed values.

Either way, at best we get a multi-week or multi-month bounce, with quite possibly lower lows next year. If that happens, people with retirement/needed money that were too slow to pull it out now better do so at that time.

You mentioned SU. I've been flipping Suncor a lot lately, and been doing well on that. I'm hoping to pick up long-term holdings if it falls another 30% or so. Big "if", but I maintain stink bids on it just in case. Was hoping today might be the day.


Two good essays, which should remain on the front page of these sites through the weekend.

I had predicted some time ago in this thread (or maybe in my emails? ... anyway it used to be a standard part of my rants), when Greenspan was still a hero to many, that one day he'd be reviled. That day has come. [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] With apologies to some people I highly repsect who held the guy in high esteem, I always said he as a charlatan and that's pretty clearly true now. See the link for more on that, and some perspective on where the bottom might be.

Another good read. Warning this has one "naughty" word in it (the "BS" word). Invalid Link Removed

We're very lucky to be in the markets in these times. I hope those not profiting greatly from it are at least learning what to do the next time. There'll be a next time, if we're lucky. Could be a very long time from now though, so learning to make money in markets that aren't just going in one direction is even more crucial.

As always, stay out or stay hedged.
 
I'm a total n00b at investing, and I haven't gone through all the pages of this thread yet. WWE is selling at $12.45 a share right now, according to etrade.com. I'm not ready to sink thousands into the stock market right now, as I'm still a broke student, but do you guys think it's worth buying maybe three shares and see if I can earn a few bucks over a period of months holding onto them, even if it just results in money for a new pair of strings? This is mostly an experiment in the stock market before I put more effort into it.


[n00b flame suit on]
 
No, you'd do better running a practice account on paper, or even in your head. For that small an allotment, your fees would eat all profit (and then some). If it is someone like ScottTrade, it's what, $7 a trade? If you put $36 into the market, that's $7 gone, then you see it went up say, 10%, and decide to sell, that's $3.40 left out the additional $7. So you're down $10.40 from jump street. You're loading yourself with $14 per trip into and out of the market. Unless you start trading larger sums, the percentage will kill you. What is $14 out of $36, expressed as a percentage?
 
I would never flame a noob about this. It is far better to acknowledge one's noobiness in this arena than to be overconfident. So you already have one attribute of a good investor. The overconfident lose lots of money.

Bassic83 is right - what you don't have is capital. Stock trading prices are dirt cheap compared to what they were when I first started in 1988 or so. But $14 round trip is a big nut to crack if you are buying $36 of stock. You will need the stock to double before you have string money.

WWE - I owned some of that once - I think I may have lost money since I thought that if anyone could get a 2nd pro football league off the ground it was McMahon - wrong!

You may also want to do some reading. There are posts earlier about different investing approaches that may prove useful. I liked Peter Lynch's books on investing, reading Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letters is worthwile, SMASH's posts this year have called every twist and turn in this market with remarkable accuracy, well worth reading and visiting some of the sites that he recommends.

Take care of the personal finance first. Save regularly, avoid high interest debt, try to live well within your means - bassic stuff but it pays off especially when the poop hits the fan.

Today was a crazy day in the market. I came back home from a morning meeting - saw about a 5% drop in the market and bought some GE and Pepsi. I come back home after an afternoon meeting and the market is up 5% on the day. The intraday swings are insane!
 
Thanks for the input both of you above me. I'll probably spend some time watching the stocks and investing $1,000"imaginary" dollars in companies, seeing how I do. I'm also making low payments on my credit cards right now, so I'll wait until I have a more substantial income to take a swing. Again, thanks guys!
 
Thanks for the input both of you above me. I'll probably spend some time watching the stocks and investing $1,000"imaginary" dollars in companies, seeing how I do. I'm also making low payments on my credit cards right now, so I'll wait until I have a more substantial income to take a swing. Again, thanks guys!
Is there a way you can make hefty payments on the card with the highest rate? If there is, it might be worth taking on an extra shift at work to slice it down to size. Once you have that one paid, attack the next highest rate card, knock it out, then the next, and so on. Once you have less than $100 on you last card, and the key here is to not use the paid-off ones, if you don't want to close the accounts, put the cards in a big plastic bowl, like a salad bowl, and stick them in the freezer for safekeeping. Rule is, if you really need to use one (car repair, water heater, emergency plane ticket to see critically ill family, etc.), the account will still be open. But you have to let the ice melt completely, and I mean completely, on it's own. This does one thing you will eventually learn to do on your own- it makes you wait a day (or at least several hours) and gives you time to think "Do I REALLY NEED to spend this money?" If the answer is yes, you will wait for the ice to melt. If the answer is no, put it back in the freezer. If you have to justify it to yourself, you don't NEED it. And rule #2 is- no GAS pain relief through credit cards!

Easiest way I know to get out of debt. Also, while you are doubling up, or more, on CC payments, the you must have enough to make minimum payments on your other ones. If you do this, you're basically "treading water" on them, though you are keeping your credit line active. They're still getting their "pound of flesh", so to speak.

Just trying to help out. Debt bad. Cash good. :D
 
This is the best thing I have read in terms of explaining what went wrong. Very clear (even a guitarist could understand it ;)) and very well-written.

Michael Lewis is the guy who wrote "Liars Poker" about his brief career on Wall Street in the 80's. You may also recognize the name from "Moneyball" the story of how the Oakland A's general manager was able to field competitive teams at a much lower salary than the Yankees :spit: or my beloved Red Sox :hyper:. If you read either of these books, you know that the guy can break down complicated stuff and tell it in a story that is actually entertaining. And if you haven't read either of them and have any interest at all in the subject matter, I highly recommmend them.

This is a longish magazine article (9 internet pages) that is almost a coda to Liars Poker.

http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/11/11/The-End-of-Wall-Streets-Boom?print=true"#page9
 
I was just researching my Suncor holding and recalled that Bassic and I had discussed the stock recently. Just a few posts above, in late October - http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6442623&postcount=268

I'd forgotten I'd written that and it's spooky how accurate the post was. The DJIA fell exactly to the mid-7000 range and Suncor fell pretty much exactly 30%.

I got SU and a bunch of other stuff at the lows. Bassic did you take a position? FYI, Suncor isn't really profitable with oil below between $55 and $95 depending on a bunch of factors. To be safe bear in mind that if oil is below $75 we've got a speculative stock not an earning stock in Suncor. At the moment my best guess is that oil goes to around $60 and SU to around $40, but I'm ready to take profits at any time just in case it doesn't go quite like that. I'd suggest using a tight trailing stop if you have the stock. Any stock, really.

DJIA 1-month chart : http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6442623&postcount=268

I sent out an email advisory on the 20th November to start buying. Despite how frightening things seemed at the time, it's easy to take positions despite the chaos if hedging via a covered call strategy because, well, you're "covered". That's how I mitigated risk on my purchases, since put options were too expensive to hedge with - in fact I was selling puts rather than buying them, and I think I will realize 100% gains on all of them, several of which will happen in only a month's total exposure time as those contracts expire this Friday.

How did I know the lows? Well, you can never be certain which is why I hedge, unlike all those so-called hedge funds that are going bust. Other than by virtue of the DJIA hitting my target, I felt it was possibly the (temporary, I believe) bottom because a lot of rookies were asking me how to short stocks and some of them were buying put options thereby fulfilling their purpose as market barometers via examples of what not to do, and fulfilling my predictions that those who had lost massively by late October were still going to lose massive amounts more. God bless them all.

I think we've seen the beginning of "a multi-week or multi-month bounce" I predicted would start at those levels, and I still am quite certain that we'll see lower lows next year or perhaps in the next few years at the latest as government fulfills my predictions of "temporary 'solutions' that actually make the problem and eventual result worse but delays it."

Anyone who thinks a government infrastructure spending boom will help might want to read up on Japan's last 20-year recession, still ongoing and perhaps becoming a 30 or 40-year recession. As I'd said would happen in this thread a year or two ago, the U.S. berated Japan's economic actions back in the 80's but has now made all of the exact same mistakes - bailing out banks, cutting interest rates to zero, infrastructure spending boom, etc. Note-for-note. As I like to say, history repeats.

Also the US Debt, per the Treasury's recent report, is fulfilling my dire predictions. People thought me crazy. Let me tell you now it's just the start.

Enjoy this chart, exactly as it appears in the Treasury’s report: Invalid Link Removed And that omits social security funding, which would make it look far worse.

Cretins and frauds are running the show, with very few exceptions. Always good for a laugh, but ultimately tragic and so it shall end tragically inlcuding with the president-elect having approval ratings no better than the president-exit.

Note that many more states are now in danger of becoming insolvent. I presume that's on the news in the States? Many more will soon be on that list. Figure at least half of the States. Hundreds of counties. More predictions fulfilled. More people losing their jobs or having their wages and benefits frozen or rolled-back. Pension funds going into the crapper - CALPERS lost over 100% in its residential investments. Yes, over 100%. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122947172015212225.html?mod=testMod The average retirement age will be 75 before long.

For now longs, I suggest, should enjoy the rally while it lasts and consider getting out while they can. I've almost been completely long for a few weeks now, for the first time in almost 2 years, save a few short hedges in companies that will go to zero soon. As markets rally I'll be shorting more such companies, for example GCI (parent of "USA Today" and others), which I believe will no longer exist by this time next year.

Hope you're all doing well. I doubt we can expect '09 to be as easy to call as the last couple years, but here's hoping !
 
I bought into SU.to a couple years ago, and rode it up. I bought in at $35, and I think I sold at $70. I had DIA at $91, sold that one at $130, now it's at $89 again.

The Madoff debacle has wiped out a LOT of people. People who had millions in their life savings, all in one basket- not smart. But there was a trust factor tthat was breached, and it was along ethnic lines, to a large degree. $50Bn just disappeared in the "largest Ponzi scheme since Ponzi"...I don't think that's true in the least. Look at what Paulson has done- $700Bn of the US taxpayers' money unaccounted for. It's a looting of the Treasury, the largest heist in history. Take Al Capone and all the other gangsters of the Roaring Twenties, put then together, and they still couldn't have stolen that much...because it didn't exist! Now the tab is looking like it'll be over $1Tn! A stack of $1000 bills equaling $1Trillion dollars, how high would that reach? A thousand feet into the air? Ten thousand? Heh. Try 67.9 MILES! :eek: These guys are ruining the economy, and I believe they are doing it on purpose.

For the near future, I am thinking of going with CSX, but am cautious on that one as well. The rail shipping sector is expecting lower shipments through 2009, but IF the new administration gets its way with the infrastructure spending bills, that's one area that will see a benefit.

Another would be the solar industry as a whole, I see that one getting further tax credits (and I am planning a solar roof right now as well). Anything "green" is now garnering a premium as everyone from Chevron to International Paper is trying everything they can to "go green".

As far as automakers, GM and Chrysler will fail within a couple months. Ford will hang on a while longer- if they can get through 2009, they'll make it. I said they were the best of a bad lot before, and I'll say it again. More international in scope, less focused on gaudy SUVs, with an international engineering arm, less exposure to the toxic waste dump that is th sub-prime mess. Now GMAC is putting out ads as a bank...I think I'd rather bury my money in the back yard!
 
Oh, I thought you were talking about picking up SU again.

CSX looks decent. Just limit your downside. Maybe sell covered calls or don't hold it below $30. Burlington Northern hit its lows just recently and I think, like all stocks, they'll all hit new lows in due time so it's all about playing a bounce and it's kind-of just all one market right now and has been for months. Everything going up and down together. But there are a few things worth taking initial positions in if you're longer-term minded and willing to ride it out, but then definitely sell covered calls IMO.

I think "green" everything will be in the dumps as long as oil is cheap. Also the industry is suffereing the unravelling of the whole ethanol scam.

Of course I agree re: the scammongers in Washington.

There have been lot's of big Ponzi scheme since Ponzi - Invalid Link Removed


I agree Ford is the best of that sad bunch, but Ford keeps lying year after year about becoming profitable. I expect it'll fail too barring a restructuring.


As for GMAC, check this out from yesterday's Stansberry :

In a piggyback scandal to the Madoff mess, money manager J. Ezra Merkin charged clients 1.5% to put all $1.8 billion of their money in Madoff's hands.

Madoff's name comes up only twice in Merkin's offering documents, and then only as a prime broker. On page 12, Merkin, who also happens to be chairman of GMAC, tells investors the partnership will "make investments through third-party managers, using managed accounts, mutual funds, private investment partnerships, closed-end funds and other pooled investment vehicles (including special purpose vehicles), each of which is intended to engage in investment strategies similar to the Partnership's." (Italics added.)

Of course, the partnership's strategy turns out to be identical to Madoff's. Merkin obviously set up the partnership to lead investors to believe he was managing their money, while fully intending to give it straight to Madoff from the start. I'm sure Merkin was only lying to his money-management clients. I bet he tells the truth every minute when he's running GMAC.

Stay hedged !
 
It amazes me how many people really don't understand a thing about money, and many of them have quite a bit more of it than I do (I'm really quite poor). We have only seen the tip of the iceberg re:Madoff, the ripples are just now starting to be seen. And most of the public are blissfully unaware of this mess, like they still are about the "bailout". The most anyone seems to think of the "bailout" is that we forked over $700Bn to people who are going to stabilize the economy and save us from ruin. Hah. I don't THINK so, Tim! Trust has been betrayed, which is one reason I see the "economic downturn" or "recession" or "lack of consumer confidence" lasting into the next decade. Many of those affected lived through the 80s turmoil, and have at least a foggy recollection of what happened then. When all is said and done, I still call bottom at around $6400, give or take a little.
 
Speaking of important news, how many people voted for the winner of "Dancing with Decrepit Former Hollywood Stars Who Can't Even Get Work Doing Commercials"?

And what about Jamie Lynn Spears' new baby?

OOOOH LOOK! SOMETHING SHINY!!! <wanders away>
 
Those who have a clue have more company now :

"Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today issued an executive order to prepare state government and its employees for the worsening state budget crisis.
[...]
Our state's fiscal crisis has worsened dramatically in the past few weeks without legislative action to address our budget crisis. We face an approximately $15 billion General Fund deficit this fiscal year, and that number is estimated to grow to $42 billion over the next 18 months. Without immediate action, the state will not have enough cash to meet its obligations starting in February."

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Invalid Link Removed


"Vice president-elect Joseph Biden, in his first interview since the November 4 election, told ABC TV that the US economy was in "much worse shape" than he thought and needed a second stimulus package to prevent it from tanking. He said a second big stimulus package would be needed to keep from "absolutely tanking."
[...]
Obama said on Friday, "It will take longer than any of us would like -- years, not months. It will get worse before it gets better."

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


My comment - of course the stimulus ideas are absolute nonsense and outright theft via misappropriation. It's also total rubbish that all "major" economists agree with what the government is doing. Those economists who are in the fantasy world of academia or on the government payroll of course are fully into robbing taxpayers and devaluing the fiat "currency" - neither of which have ever actually worked in the real world, haven't worked thus far during this "crisis", and will continue to not only fail but to at best only delay the end result while making things worse.