Locally people want 2500 to 3000 Can Bucks here
I’d say roughly $1800 for one in good shape here. I’ve seen some abused looking ones being sold for around $1100
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Locally people want 2500 to 3000 Can Bucks here
I corrected my postI’d say roughly $1800 for one in good shape here. I’ve seen some abused looking ones being sold for around $1100
Then there’s Wata’s pedal collection(at the end)…And that's just the rehearsal room![]()
Then why is there so much marketing to state as you do and yet a 40+ year old Marshall Super Bass will draw more attention from other bass players to a no contest degree?The only reason I haven't replaced my Walkabout Scout with a Subway rig is lack of funds. Not that the Walkabout is hugely heavy, it's only 55 lbs, the head being only 13 lbs of that, if I remember correctly. But, my next, and probably final, bass rig in my life will be a Subway head with either Mesa or Barefaced cab(s).
Many of the bigger, heavier amps of the past were great amps, but they weren't and aren't better than the best of the current offerings, and the cabinets today are much lighter and more accurate than the cabs of 20-30 years ago.
I got my 50th anniversary Heritage SVT in like new condition for 1400USDLocally people want 1500 to 2000 Can Bucks here
WOW! That speaks volumes about what kind of prices large/heavy gear is commanding these days for what is genuinely premium and highly regarded equipment. IMO amps like this are valued by many for reasons that are often outweighed (no pun intended) by their weight and/or size. However, they are still bargain priced by the market presumably due to low demand.I got my 50th anniversary Heritage SVT in like new condition for 1400USD
Yes, that’s pretty close to what it costs to build.WOW! That speaks volumes about what kind of prices large/heavy gear is commanding these days for what is genuinely premium and highly regarded equipment. IMO amps like this are valued by many for reasons that are often outweighed (no pun intended) by their weight and/or size. However, they are still bargain priced by the market presumably due to low demand.
I could not get over the condition and the price, it is a 2018 product, so it sat unused likely, covered as it still had the hang tag and was not even dusty internally. I traded a couple items (and got more in trade than I paid) and got a further discount over the tag price which was 1600, I was only out of pocket @1200 all told . I missed my old SVT, could not pass it up. I had just acquired an empty LabSeries 2x15 for 100 so it was a perfect situationYes, that’s pretty close to what it costs to build.
Then why is there so much marketing to state as you do and yet a 40+ year old Marshall Super Bass will draw more attention from other bass players to a no contest degree?
I'm not really sure what you are trying to say here, but it appears to me you are suffering from confirmation bias. I've been playing bass for 30 years. I have never even seen a Marshall Super Bass. In fact, I've never seen a bassist ever playing a Marshall amp, period.
From my perspective, there is virtually zero interest in Marshall bass amps. If I were interested in returning to using tube amps, I wouldn't be looking for a Marshall, at all, I'd be looking for a Trace Elliot V-Type (again, I used to own two of them), a Mesa/Boogie, an Aguilar, a Demeter, an Eden, or an Ampeg.
If there were really more interest in large heavy amps, that's what manufacturers would be making. There clearly isn't, because modern technology has obviated the need for amps to be big and heavy. That doesn't make older, bigger, and heavier amps not sound good, it just makes them older, bigger, and heavier.
Only player I know of that was a diehard Marshall guy was LemmyI'm not really sure what you are trying to say here, but it appears to me you are suffering from confirmation bias. I've been playing bass for 30 years. I have never even seen a Marshall Super Bass. In fact, I've never seen a bassist ever playing a Marshall amp, period.
From my perspective, there is virtually zero interest in Marshall bass amps. If I were interested in returning to using tube amps, I wouldn't be looking for a Marshall, at all, I'd be looking for a Trace Elliot V-Type (again, I used to own two of them), a Mesa/Boogie, an Aguilar, a Demeter, an Eden, or an Ampeg.
If there were really more interest in large heavy amps, that's what manufacturers would be making. There clearly isn't, because modern technology has obviated the need for amps to be big and heavy. That doesn't make older, bigger, and heavier amps not sound good, it just makes them older, bigger, and heavier.
Marshall - and Orange - tube bass amps are popular in certain genres. I'd have said Orange much more so, but Marshall still have some bass fans. If you've never seen a bassist use a Marshall amp, from that I can deduce that you never saw Motörhead live.
Only player I know of that was a diehard Marshall guy was Lemmy
Only player I know of that was a diehard Marshall guy was Lemmy
If there were really more interest in large heavy amps, that's what manufacturers would be making.