I would like to buy, if I can, before I die, one more new bass rig and one more new guitar rig, just to have had them, but the truth is that I am planning for a future of ampless gigs, and will not miss hauling that heavy, bulky gear. If I eventually do get around to buying new stage rigs, they will probably never leave my home or rehearsal space, unless I move house.
I think that what many people are missing is that it's not impossible to get great sound out of ampless pedalboards running into PA equipment, but what you need to have to get great sound that way is a completely different mindset, just a completely different way of thinking about what a live performance "ought" to sound like.
There are plenty of situations in which using live amps is appropriate, and that's not going to change, because the nature of the physics of sound in space isn't going to change. Whenever there is a fundamental shift in technology and how we use it, there are always going to be those people who do not, cannot, will not, refuse to, or fail to make the transition, for whatever reason, and they don't necessarily *need* to, either.
But I, for one, am perfectly fine with putting the onus on the venue to provide appropriate audio reinforcement. In my experience, in my career as a musician, it has always been the venues who make the majority of the money, primarily because historically, they have been able to offload most of the responsibilities they ought to be shouldering onto individual musicians. Why should a venue operator invest in a good sound system, if by not doing so, they can force the thousands of musicians who play at their venue to compensate by investing *their* money in good sound?
I think that what many people are missing is that it's not impossible to get great sound out of ampless pedalboards running into PA equipment, but what you need to have to get great sound that way is a completely different mindset, just a completely different way of thinking about what a live performance "ought" to sound like.
There are plenty of situations in which using live amps is appropriate, and that's not going to change, because the nature of the physics of sound in space isn't going to change. Whenever there is a fundamental shift in technology and how we use it, there are always going to be those people who do not, cannot, will not, refuse to, or fail to make the transition, for whatever reason, and they don't necessarily *need* to, either.
But I, for one, am perfectly fine with putting the onus on the venue to provide appropriate audio reinforcement. In my experience, in my career as a musician, it has always been the venues who make the majority of the money, primarily because historically, they have been able to offload most of the responsibilities they ought to be shouldering onto individual musicians. Why should a venue operator invest in a good sound system, if by not doing so, they can force the thousands of musicians who play at their venue to compensate by investing *their* money in good sound?
Last edited:
