Never underestimate the power of people dying.Never underestimate the power of nostalgia.
Riis
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Never underestimate the power of people dying.Never underestimate the power of nostalgia.
Riis
Young musicians are really into visual aspects of performance where iconic gear plays a big role; being young they are still cute and ridiculousness doesn’t inhibit their onstage goofiness. Rock music gets a lot of mileage out of pageantry and fantasy which perennially defines the many subgenres of the form. This is why Gibbons, Fiendr, Rickenslacker, Gruntsch axes always fetch high prices. In amps, the beastly stacks of Marsha & Amplague, Funn0))) visually demonstrate to audiences that we are all here to RAWK.I don't know about that. All the local kids use classic/heavy gear and that's been for as long as I can remember. I get older, the kids stay the same age and use the same gear.
It seems to me that a lot of this boils down to genre.
Class D is certainly more convenient with regards to weight/size, but better? If Class D is better, why are do so many Class D amps come with tube preamps, simulated tube drive and marketing that hints at a "tube tone" (if not saying downright that the design is "based on" some older tube amp)? And why do people pay lots of money on modelling preamps, simulating a real tube amp in front of their Class D amps?
I'm not saying Class D amps are bad, far from it. But I have yet to find a Class D amp (or any kind of modelling amp/pedal) that makes me want to get rid of my tube amps.
If quality is poor, then you can have all the portability you want by carying nothing, so if the Amp is superior quality I think a bit for moving restrictions won't hurt
Reading between the lines here tends to indicate that many small amp fans tend to feel the need to justify their choice mostly using weight and portability and big iron users accept that trade off for tones they prefer. The prior camp avoids profusely, the comparison of tone between the two.
I've enjoyed roadies for most of my background and having some large rigs behind me so can appreciate the light argument when I am providing shanks pony. But, the argument stops dead in its tracks when the always missing "tone", is added to the preference.
At the end of this thread, I would expect the light loaders to be the larger in number yet also expect that number to near reverse if players were asked to play what they actually preferred.
I don't know about that. All the local kids use classic/heavy gear and that's been for as long as I can remember. I get older, the kids stay the same age and use the same gear.
It seems to me that a lot of this boils down to genre.
Much of this boils down to visuals and the depressed cost of older, heavy gear in general IMO.
Niche markets will always have some demand, though often this demand gets filled from the oversupply of large, heavy used gear, usually for less that 25 cents on the dollar.

This hasn't been my experience at all. I'm curious where you are seeing that, because in other conversations on TB, the cesspool that is facebook, and IME i see the exact opposite - in fact, I'm all Class D right now and couldn't be happier with my tone - and I have been through A LOT of amps and preamps. The portability is a plus, but I wouldn't use something that I wasn't happy with tone-wise. I suspect most other bassists are the same.Reading between the lines here tends to indicate that many small amp fans tend to feel the need to justify their choice mostly using weight and portability and big iron users accept that trade off for tones they prefer. The prior camp avoids profusely, the comparison of tone between the two.
I've enjoyed roadies for most of my background and having some large rigs behind me so can appreciate the light argument when I am providing shanks pony. But, the argument stops dead in its tracks when the always missing "tone", is added to the preference.
At the end of this thread, I would expect the light loaders to be the larger in number yet also expect that number to near reverse if players were asked to play what they actually preferred.
true that! The ONLY justification that I have heard has been "you just can't get that tone from class D" nonsense. Oh, and nonsensical things like "class D doesn't move air" etc.What about the big, heavy amp fans feeling the need to justify their choices?
You should try my Mesa Subway D-800 or Plus....I think you might be happy
The prior camp avoids profusely, the comparison of tone between the two.
Very highly unlikely. That gear is expensive. Plus not enough large venues, not enough actual bands, not enough roadies, gas prices.I know Im in the minority, but I do think big amps will become fashionable again one day. Just like records have come back, kids will want to experience the real thing. There is something special that digital recreations cannot capture and just the feeling of moving that air cannot be truly mimicked. Prolly not 5 years but maybe 10. Thought?
I'm sorry to hear that.Sorry.
I tried both and detested both.