• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Big E Speakers Part 4 - Quadraphenia

Last week I showed up at Mike's and found a MAS 112 with the proprietary Eminence, a Bodai 112, and a Bodai 115 lined up. I posted before about the Bodai 110 that is a big improvement over the MAS 110. My favorite MAS cab has been the 112 with the eminence because it has a more traditional bass cab sound with the MVW advantages. It didn't seem to have a sound with as prominent mids as I would have liked, but with a little eq, it sounded amazing. Enter the Bodai. I first heard the Bodai 112 with music and the only MAS cab that I've heard that has that kind of clarity and imaging was the 4x5. Next we tried it with a bass. Any speaker I've heard that sounds great with music is not usually for me a good choice for electric bass, so I was kind of worried. I shouldn't have been, the Bodai 112 has all the best of the MAS and much more. Like the 110 the bass is tighter and punchier because of the slightly smaller cab and the mids and highs are incomparable. Not only are the mids more articulate, but the sound is sweeter as well, even with a little grit added.
The dispersion, like the 110 is nuts. I could hear upper mids behind the cab.

The 115 is a monster. As I expected, the low end made me feel sick and it was insanely loud, but still tight and punchy with great note definition. The mids sounded to me very slightly sweeter than the 112. Good for a big stage or outside or demolition. Same crazy dispersion as the other two.
Mike has done it again!
 
Last week I showed up at Mike's and found a MAS 112 with the proprietary Eminence, a Bodai 112, and a Bodai 115 lined up. I posted before about the Bodai 110 that is a big improvement over the MAS 110. My favorite MAS cab has been the 112 with the eminence because it has a more traditional bass cab sound with the MVW advantages. It didn't seem to have a sound with as prominent mids as I would have liked, but with a little eq, it sounded amazing. Enter the Bodai. I first heard the Bodai 112 with music and the only MAS cab that I've heard that has that kind of clarity and imaging was the 4x5. Next we tried it with a bass. Any speaker I've heard that sounds great with music is not usually for me a good choice for electric bass, so I was kind of worried. I shouldn't have been, the Bodai 112 has all the best of the MAS and much more. Like the 110 the bass is tighter and punchier because of the slightly smaller cab and the mids and highs are incomparable. Not only are the mids more articulate, but the sound is sweeter as well, even with a little grit added.
The dispersion, like the 110 is nuts. I could hear upper mids behind the cab.

The 115 is a monster. As I expected, the low end made me feel sick and it was insanely loud, but still tight and punchy with great note definition. The mids sounded to me very slightly sweeter than the 112. Good for a big stage or outside or demolition. Same crazy dispersion as the other two.
Mike has done it again!

Having played a pair of the new 10s together, how would you compare the 2x110 vs 1x115?

Also, I am with you on the MAS112 with the Eminence being my favorite. The more traditional voicing and warmth is fabulous. Do all three models of the Bodai cabs keep that vibe?
 
Last edited:
It seems to me two 110 Bodais would have about the same or slightly more volume than the 115 and are very slightly punchier, but the 115 is smaller than two 110's, less money, and has a very slightly sweeter midrange.
The Bodais seem to have even more of that traditional mid forward thing, especially when you take out some padding on the mids. I love the 112 MAS, but the Bodais, especially the 112, have a sound I definitely prefer.
 
That's really difficult question. Depends on your sense of tone and perception of what you hear. I felt it was a big enough difference, to the new cabinet is evolutionary for several reasons. I played almost all mikes prototypes since the beginning and even side by side compared them. So I hear the new 12 as being even more full and balanced. The old 12 is still an awesome cab and to me really is exceptional above other 12's. If you have never owned any of the MAS cabs the original 12 will astonish you at a more palatable price point.
 
Question for all you MAS folks. I have a MAS112 with the Faital woofer. I really like the cab but have some serious issues with the low end. I have a very difficult time with too much lows - they seem to overpower the other frequencies a great deal and I cannot get a clear full tone, if I get the boom cut out then it is just too thin and looses warmth. I have used this cab with multiple amps, basses and in practice areas and larger rooms. I always fight the low end to the point that it spends most of its time in storage now - I use a Empress para eq and notch hard down low but it still doesn't really get me there. So my choices are selling it or finding out if I can replace that woofer for another with a tone more in line with my sound - right now it makes me wish I was in a Dub or Reqgae band.
Thanks for any insight,
 
  • Like
Reactions: tminus10
Question for all you MAS folks. I have a MAS112 with the Faital woofer. I really like the cab but have some serious issues with the low end. I have a very difficult time with too much lows - they seem to overpower the other frequencies a great deal and I cannot get a clear full tone, if I get the boom cut out then it is just too thin and looses warmth. I have used this cab with multiple amps, basses and in practice areas and larger rooms. I always fight the low end to the point that it spends most of its time in storage now - I use a Empress para eq and notch hard down low but it still doesn't really get me there. So my choices are selling it or finding out if I can replace that woofer for another with a tone more in line with my sound - right now it makes me wish I was in a Dub or Reqgae band.
Thanks for any insight,
Gab124,

I have used both the 18Sound version and the Eminence version. To me the 18sound was a bit too dry/lean for my taste, but many others like it. I am not familiar with the Faital version, but it sounds like it has the most low end extension of the 3 driver options. Have you tried a high pass filter? With a HPF you can dial out the Low lows and bump the low mids with your para eq. Another option would be switching to the Eminence driver. You would have to speak to Mike about this, but I am super happy with this cab. There is a possiblity of needing to update the crossover, but since they are bot 4 ohm twelves you may get lucky. Mike usually does his best to help his customers, so I'm sure there is a cost effective way to fix your issue. Personally, I would choose swapping the driver. If you aren't a fan of the inherent tone of the current driver, having to use a bunch of EQ sculpting all the time seems like a headache.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5StringPocket
Gab124,

I have used both the 18Sound version and the Eminence version. To me the 18sound was a bit too dry/lean for my taste, but many others like it. I am not familiar with the Faital version, but it sounds like it has the most low end extension of the 3 driver options. Have you tried a high pass filter? With a HPF you can dial out the Low lows and bump the low mids with your para eq. Another option would be switching to the Eminence driver. You would have to speak to Mike about this, but I am super happy with this cab. There is a possiblity of needing to update the crossover, but since they are bot 4 ohm twelves you may get lucky. Mike usually does his best to help his customers, so I'm sure there is a cost effective way to fix your issue. Personally, I would choose swapping the driver. If you aren't a fan of the inherent tone of the current driver, having to use a bunch of EQ sculpting all the time seems like a headache.


I usually have the eq pedals and such for every rig, but can get to my needed tone pretty quickly for a particular room or rig and be done. I fiddle all night when using the MAS cab, though oddly I always get compliments on the tone - I do have an Fdeck dual HPF filter as well. It is weird though because when I get enough low end out the whole sound becomes too sterile and bright. This cab is a 5 driver version with 4 mid drivers in addition to the woofer. I may write Mike and see what he thinks. I do appreciate the thoughts and ideas, I am hoping a speaker swap is the simplest way to go about this.
 
Well there is the
@RHA III , here's the link to the Flex210. I've played through it (owner lent it to me when I was in need of a cab) and it's fine, fine, fine.
For Sale - MAS 210 Flex, local sale preferred
Well since I was selling a 2x10 Flex I did not reply, but I am a prior owner of a self built 1515/66 and an LDS 1515/66. I love Greenboy for his groundbreaking designs and generosity. I do have a preference for MAS BigE however. I have 2 big venue/outdoor.
 
If you're talking an Ampeg 610 HLF, I've played one of those. Everything this cab does, including the mids, it does better than the Ampeg. Not so much a matter of more mids (though there's plenty of mids on tap) as it is the quality of the mids -- the detail, the dispersion -- and the tweeters (two -- you can switch them on or off individually) are worlds better. Lows are deeper and more articulate.

There is a 210 Flex in the classifieds about 7 hours from you for about half the new price. It's a bigger cab (check the description), but if you're used to a 610 and were going to haul a 15/6 and 15 sub, it shouldn't be a problem.

Shipping big cabs sucks these days, both in terms of cost and in risk to the cabs (particularly around the holiday season). If I were you, I'd get in touch with the seller, and a) find a cheap place to stay the night near Santa Cruz (and something fun to do in town), make a day of it, and arrange to try the cab or b) ask the seller nicely if he'd meet you half way -- maybe find a pizza joint and buy him a meal for the trouble.

I have the modular version of this cab (among other MAS cabs). If you're looking for something to play in your living room at night, it's wasted. If you could cover the gig with a 1x10 combo -- or even a regular 210 -- it's overkill. If you're playing a gig where you can open it up some and want it to carry the room (or at least do a chunk of the heavy lifting -- a gig where you'd legitimately use a 610 or where you've run out of steam with a 410), I haven't played anything better. To my ear (others might disagree) at home practice volumes it can sound a little rough, but it really comes alive -- fills out, opens up, and gets that 3D effect going -- when you give it some juice.

EDIT: I thought the product description I linked to would list the dimensions, but I don't see them. A quick search of this site turns up an old ad for one with dimensions listed as 32"x26"x14" (HxWxD), and that seems about right. Weight would be in the 70-80 pound range. Check with the seller and/or Mike Arnopol to verify. Mine is out of town at the moment, or I'd at least check the width and depth for you.
If you're talking an Ampeg 610 HLF, I've played one of those. Everything this cab does, including the mids, it does better than the Ampeg. Not so much a matter of more mids (though there's plenty of mids on tap) as it is the quality of the mids -- the detail, the dispersion -- and the tweeters (two -- you can switch them on or off individually) are worlds better. Lows are deeper and more articulate.

There is a 210 Flex in the classifieds about 7 hours from you for about half the new price. It's a bigger cab (check the description), but if you're used to a 610 and were going to haul a 15/6 and 15 sub, it shouldn't be a problem.

Shipping big cabs sucks these days, both in terms of cost and in risk to the cabs (particularly around the holiday season). If I were you, I'd get in touch with the seller, and a) find a cheap place to stay the night near Santa Cruz (and something fun to do in town), make a day of it, and arrange to try the cab or b) ask the seller nicely if he'd meet you half way -- maybe find a pizza joint and buy him a meal for the trouble.

I have the modular version of this cab (among other MAS cabs). If you're looking for something to play in your living room at night, it's wasted. If you could cover the gig with a 1x10 combo -- or even a regular 210 -- it's overkill. If you're playing a gig where you can open it up some and want it to carry the room (or at least do a chunk of the heavy lifting -- a gig where you'd legitimately use a 610 or where you've run out of steam with a 410), I haven't played anything better. To my ear (others might disagree) at home practice volumes it can sound a little rough, but it really comes alive -- fills out, opens up, and gets that 3D effect going -- when you give it some juice.

EDIT: I thought the product description I linked to would list the dimensions, but I don't see them. A quick search of this site turns up an old ad for one with dimensions listed as 32"x26"x14" (HxWxD), and that seems about right. Weight would be in the 70-80 pound range. Check with the seller and/or Mike Arnopol to verify. Mine is out of town at the moment, or I'd at least check the width and depth for you.
So as always MarkA has great insight into what is happening with these cabs. The main thing is the vortex and when you start to feel it's mojo. One only needs to take a smaller version into most small to medium venues if your genre is lower volume i.e.blues jazz etc. Although my long time blues band included SRV and Hendrix so I went a little heavier loaded as the guitar and drummer doubled down on voodoo chile etc. I actually sold my swiss army knife 4x6 just because I had 3 MAS cabs at that point and felt a need to downsize. It could cover most clubs all by itself though, and I only once heard it starting to break up a little when playing a gig with guitar keys loud harmonica and medium hitting drummer in a tall ceiling mid size club. The club owner slapped me on the back and told me the volume was perfect at the end of the show. I originally rolled in the 210 flex and the 46 stacked on top of it which was ridiculous, but I was just going to experiment during the gig. Put the Flex back in my rig after sound check as I could tell the 46 was going to make it in the space, and open up the vortex to perfection. I did hear it breaking up some on big songs where I was digging in. So picking the right size unit is important. However the MAS cabs sound just like any other cabs at low volume. Just fine! Just not magical until you pump em up a bit. Magic!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kesslari
Question for all you MAS folks. I have a MAS112 with the Faital woofer. I really like the cab but have some serious issues with the low end. I have a very difficult time with too much lows - they seem to overpower the other frequencies a great deal and I cannot get a clear full tone, if I get the boom cut out then it is just too thin and looses warmth. I have used this cab with multiple amps, basses and in practice areas and larger rooms. I always fight the low end to the point that it spends most of its time in storage now - I use a Empress para eq and notch hard down low but it still doesn't really get me there. So my choices are selling it or finding out if I can replace that woofer for another with a tone more in line with my sound - right now it makes me wish I was in a Dub or Reqgae band.
Thanks for any insight,

try putting it up a foot or so on a stand?
 
Question for all you MAS folks. I have a MAS112 with the Faital woofer. I really like the cab but have some serious issues with the low end. I have a very difficult time with too much lows - they seem to overpower the other frequencies a great deal and I cannot get a clear full tone, if I get the boom cut out then it is just too thin and looses warmth. I have used this cab with multiple amps, basses and in practice areas and larger rooms. I always fight the low end to the point that it spends most of its time in storage now - I use a Empress para eq and notch hard down low but it still doesn't really get me there. So my choices are selling it or finding out if I can replace that woofer for another with a tone more in line with my sound - right now it makes me wish I was in a Dub or Reqgae band.
Thanks for any insight,

I usually have the eq pedals and such for every rig, but can get to my needed tone pretty quickly for a particular room or rig and be done. I fiddle all night when using the MAS cab, though oddly I always get compliments on the tone - I do have an Fdeck dual HPF filter as well. It is weird though because when I get enough low end out the whole sound becomes too sterile and bright. This cab is a 5 driver version with 4 mid drivers in addition to the woofer. I may write Mike and see what he thinks. I do appreciate the thoughts and ideas, I am hoping a speaker swap is the simplest way to go about this.

try putting it up a foot or so on a stand?

Emphases above are mine.

My understanding of the various MAS 112 cabs is that they go 18Sound-->custom Eminence-->Faital in order of "leanest" to "biggest bottom". I don't think that means that the Faital necessarily extends lower than the Eminence (though I think they both go a bit lower than the 18 Sound). FWIW, I own the 18Sound 112. I've played it out several times and have played it next to the Eminence 112 (though only at Mike's place). I haven't played the Faital 112, unfortunately, and I haven't heard you play yours or try to EQ it to get the low end under control and get your sound (I also don't know what your sound is), so I can only guess at what might help.

That said, I wonder if you might be going about things the wrong way. When you say you "notch hard down low" with the Empress EQ, I infer a deep, narrow cut, which is what I might do if I had a specific note that jumped out from the others -- a specific problem frequency -- but if the low end overall is too big and boomy, I'd think a more broad and shallow cut would be more helpful.

Likewise, I wonder if too much deep low end information and/or extension is actually the problem -- or as significant a contributor to it as you think it might be. It sounds to me like you're dialing out too much -- maybe the problem is too much 250-500 Hz (to pick some random numbers) and you're trying to get rid of it by rolling up the HPF. You're not going to get to the problem area that way, but you will neuter your lows. Again, I don't know that this is what's going on, but it seems possible from what you're saying.

Finally, while I've always played my 18Sound 112 vertically and on the floor and never had any problems with uncontrolled low end, I've found that the 46, run with or without the 110 sub, benefits from being elevated (indeed, that's how Mike recommends those cabs be run). Getting them a foot or a foot-and-a-half off the floor reduces the low end coupling and clears things up -- there is still plenty of bass on tap (with the sub especially), but it's not obscuring the mids and highs like it can when the cabs are on the floor, and the whole rig feels better balanced. Maybe the Faital 112 would benefit from a similar treatment? Worth trying to see. If you're on a boomy/hollow stage, that could help, too.

I'd try elevating the cab (if you have the room, I'd also try elevating it and running it horizontally, just to see what happens). I'd do that first. As for HPF/EQ, I'd try rolling up the HPF until you start to hear it thin out the sound a bit, then I'd back it off a hair from there. With the Empress, unless you think you've got a specific problem note, I'd mess around with some more broad and gentle cuts down low. I'm guessing that what you're hearing is more upper bass/low mids than you want to and that it's masking the mids/highs you want to hear, which is what's making you feel like you're in Reggae band instead of a Yes tribute.

If all that doesn't get you where you want to go, it may very well be that that's not the cab -- or at least not the version of that cab -- for you.

For the record, I think 3rdcurve's characterization of the 18Sound 112, which is my current go-to cab, is fair -- it is lean and dry, but it takes EQ well (that said, I don't use much EQ), hits hard down low, and opens up nicely at performance volume, so it's worked well for me and my tonal goals (I like lots of clarity and articulation). I think I'd dig the Eminence version, too. From descriptions I've read and talking with Mike, I don't think the Faital version would be for me, but it seems lots of Blues guys love it and that it would be good for (though not limited to) Reggae and other bottom-heavy styles.

Anyway, good luck. Let us know how things work out for you.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts