TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Stoves burn, reliably so. That's not conjecture because it's been well demonstrated and there really aren't any plausible alternative outcomes. The BL's reasons in this drummer situation aren't known for sure by anybody here, and without knowing all of the facts there are multiple plausible explanations. So yes, your explanation, though very plausible and consistent with the few facts we do know, is conjecture. I won't be at all surprised if your explanation is confirmed to be right, but I also won't be surprised if it turns out to be a "me too" scenario.Without touching the stove we could all say it's conjecture to believe you'll be burned.
But when they had the chance to bring the old drummer back, they kept the new drummer. That contradicts this whole conspiracy thing.
I didn't conclude Drugs or Alcohol abuse at all. I assumed it was something pretty shady...Total speculation on my part. Re reading, you are right, it wasn't implied at all. So, not implied, but my suspicion.
Just because she didn't do it immediately, doesn't mean she didn't do it.
No, you didn't miss it. The BL just relayed a bunch of rumors and offered nothing else. Malicious hints that the drummer is a horrible person and needs to be canned. The way it's presented here sounds to me like the kind of gaslighting I've seen before (there were signs in rehearsal, blah blah blah, when no one else noticed anything unusual). And then, strangely by coincidence, the previous drummer is available to step in and save the day!Will someone please paraphrase what is going on here? All I see is a BL giving the bassist a BS reason for firing a drummer that sucks in the first place. What is the actual "reason" from the BL? What is this rumor that she heard about the drummer? Did I miss it? Or is this seriously nine pages of nothing?
Sweet. Thanks. I've quit bands for less. Music is my drama-free zone. Tamper with that and you're looking for a new bassist. I'd be curious to see just how good this lady can sing.No, you didn't miss it. The BL just relayed a bunch of rumors and offered nothing else. Malicious hints that the drummer is a horrible person and needs to be canned. The way it's presented here sounds to me like the kind of gaslighting I've seen before (there were signs in rehearsal, blah blah blah, when no one else noticed anything unusual). And then, strangely by coincidence, the previous drummer is available to step in and save the day!
So yes, it's nine pages of nothing. There's no additional reason or evidence being presented by the BL to back up her claim, but the drummer is out and the new, previously fired drummer is back in. Tie it up with a bow![]()
Sweet. Thanks. I've quit bands for less. Music is my drama-free zone. Tamper with that and you're looking for a new bassist. I'd be curious to see just how good this lady can sing.
But when given an opportunity to do it, she said that they need to keep their replacement drummer. That's evidence. Now something big has turned up with the drummer and the torches and pitchforks want to assume that the evil bandleader is making up something. So funny.
That's evidence that the other drummer wasn't ready to agree to step in yet.But when given an opportunity to do it, she said that they need to keep their replacement drummer. That's evidence. Now something big has turned up with the drummer and the torches and pitchforks want to assume that the evil bandleader is making up something. So funny.
Well................how?This thread reminds me of this joke:
How do you keep an idiot in suspense?
Nope. My evidence is the pattern I see. Others may be blind to it; I am not. That pattern is probably the only clear evidence of anything in this situation. It's way too tidy and convenient that this happened when the old drummer became available again.
Now, there's plenty of room for error in any situation and I'd be happy to be wrong about this. But based on what I've experienced (and yes, experience counts for a lot in life) I'd be surprised to be wrong. For the sake of the OP I hope I am.
Will someone please paraphrase what is going on here? All I see is a BL giving the bassist a BS reason for firing a drummer that sucks in the first place. What is the actual "reason" from the BL? What is this rumor that she heard about the drummer? Did I miss it? Or is this seriously nine pages of nothing?
That was before the new drummer ran over the old drummer's dog.<assumes facts not in evidence>But when they had the chance to bring the old drummer back, they kept the new drummer. That contradicts this whole conspiracy thing.