TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My TU-2 got kicked to the curb in favor of the Korg Pitchblack last Summer.
Why?
Larger display, faster tuning, accuracy and ease of reading the display, true bypass, better look, etc.
Nothing that hasn't already been posted.![]()
Thanks for the reply. I bought one last night and am liking it a lot.No click, no pop. Even though it looks the same as the footswitches on effects pedals, it works more like the bypass on the TU-2.
The Korg definitely LOOKS reliable and I'll probably end up getting one, I'd just like to wait and make sure no stories of failure start rolling in. Don't wanna get burned like all the guys who got Strobostomp 1s...
I've not had any nor heard of any, but they have a new version you might wanna' take a look at.

I agree with you that true bypass can be overrated in some cases. However, in my case, I needed a true-bypass tuner because my fuzz pedals didn't react well with my buffered Korg DT-10.And as for true-bypass - I don't know why people always see it as an advantage. For instance, right now the only pedal I use is the tuner and this summer we played large stages and I had two 12ft cables and a tuner. Now I can tell you that Boss tuner worked as an excellent buffer and the sound was better with the tuner in signal chain. If you look at TU-2 specs you will see that input impedance and output impedance specs are quite good. Now with a true-bypass tuner my signal would have been weaker since there was no buffer.
I agree with you that true bypass can be overrated in some cases. However, in my case, I needed a true-bypass tuner because my fuzz pedals didn't react well with my buffered Korg DT-10.
This is the sex!
I may have to ditch me original Pitchblack and go with this one...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

This is the sex!