Now I'm not biased toward the bicyclist for any reason...but this is just what I see
I would agree, he does seem to be stepping it out and not keeping a defined line almost purposefully, there is a little tussle going on there for some reason.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Now I'm not biased toward the bicyclist for any reason...but this is just what I see
Makes sense...still looks like the bus tried to pass as soon as it was safe to
maybe a little.No sarcasm in that post? None at all?
Hover, you and I are gonna have to hang out when we get to Hell....

I would agree, he does seem to be stepping it out and not keeping a defined line almost purposefully, there is a little tussle going on there for some reason.
Still seemed to be within his lane.
And the bus driver didn't need to come back in and swipe him![]()
Good looking out Skitch...thanks for not making me look like a bicycle hater
maybe a little.
but........ you gotta wonder what the bike rider did to provoke such an action from the bus driver.
The post showed that there was a "exchange" before the bus driver took him out.
I must stick with my position that "It takes two to tango".
I wonder if we'll ever hear the whole story.
it is? huh, I didn't know that.In many European countries, that is the law- yielding to the lessor.
fourstringdrums said:I'm a bit surprised at the debate over whether the cyclist was supposed to be riding there in the first place.
Look at it this way: Lets say I'm walking down the middle of the street, obviously impeding traffic and breaking the law, and of course I wind up getting hit by a car.
Scenario 1 has me getting hit by the car because someone didn't see me.
Scenario 2 has me getting hit by the car by someone who started to pass me, and then intentionally veered back over to where I was walking.
How is it so hard to see the difference between the two? The bus started to pass him, veered to the left and hit him intentionally, and then veered back to the right. It was clearly intentional and at that point it doesn't matter whether the cyclist was supposed to be there or not.
The only bit I'll disagree with is the comparison of walking down the street and cycling down it, cycling down the middle is legal![]()
I don't know the traffic laws in Britain but I highly doubt that cyclists there have the right to ride their bike in the middle of the lane.
Maybe the bicyclist made a threatening gesture towards the bus driver and he reacted only to protect himself.
Show me where I called it self defense. And if you can I will buy you the bass of your dreams.
Munjibunga said:Exactly what is the difference between self defense and self protection? I'll take another Fodera please.
There is none, of course. Jauqo is obviously posting nonsense just to provoke a reaction from people. It is only a matter of time before he starts complaining about how people are misinterpreting his posts, being rude to him and so forth. This, of course, will be followed by another post where he once again tries to provoke a reaction by posting the same nonsense, probably while simultaneously denying that he ever posted that same thing in the first place.