No .... I don't mean a Billy Rocker flame kind of deal
. I have a '40 Kay O-1 with "tiger" back and sides ... seems like Kay only did this between about '38 to about '42 on mostly "Orchestra" models. (EDIT: Roger Stowers from the Kay Bass website told me some early S models also have the flaming.) I personally haven't seen this too often on basses. But I live in the "sticks" and I could be totally wrong. OK ... Please don't "flame" me
... I know most orchestra players aren't playing plywood Kays
!
What I want to know is .... how is this effect created? No matter how cheeezzy it may be ... sorry .... but I like it and I have gotten a number of positive comments about my bass. Are any current bass makers / finishers doing this kind of thing? Or is it just too passe and tacky
? I assume it is created by a spray (or brush?) pattern sometime during the finishing process. Then I saw this ad today in the classifieds for a 1959 Roth bass (NICE HYBRID with a fat neck, wish I lived closer to that sale) that has a tiger back and the seller said something about "factory etched."
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=397764
Here's the back of that Roth for sale: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=79272&d=1200703641
What gives? If any luthiers / finishers have any info about this, I would appreciate your comments. If any of you other TB'ers have flamey / tiger type of finishes, I would love it if you would post any photos you might have. I'm certain that the Kay folks didn't invent this finishing technique. Where and when did this technique originate? What's the history? Are there any examples of some old classical basses? ... Paging Ken Smith
. Thanks!
P.S. This is sure some nice work by Norton back-in-the-good-ole-days: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=397764 . I do realize that this flameyness is the result of the select wood grain itself and not an air-brush effect .... nevertheless .... Woof ... Gorgeous! BTW, Is anyone on the planet making ply or real wood basses with "book-end matched" symmetrical backs and/or fronts (like other acoustic instruments ... guitars and mandolins) so that the air brush / special finishing techniques are not required?
Here's my back and one side (the non-belly rubbed side):
... I know most orchestra players aren't playing plywood Kays What I want to know is .... how is this effect created? No matter how cheeezzy it may be ... sorry .... but I like it and I have gotten a number of positive comments about my bass. Are any current bass makers / finishers doing this kind of thing? Or is it just too passe and tacky
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=397764
Here's the back of that Roth for sale: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=79272&d=1200703641
What gives? If any luthiers / finishers have any info about this, I would appreciate your comments. If any of you other TB'ers have flamey / tiger type of finishes, I would love it if you would post any photos you might have. I'm certain that the Kay folks didn't invent this finishing technique. Where and when did this technique originate? What's the history? Are there any examples of some old classical basses? ... Paging Ken Smith
P.S. This is sure some nice work by Norton back-in-the-good-ole-days: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=397764 . I do realize that this flameyness is the result of the select wood grain itself and not an air-brush effect .... nevertheless .... Woof ... Gorgeous! BTW, Is anyone on the planet making ply or real wood basses with "book-end matched" symmetrical backs and/or fronts (like other acoustic instruments ... guitars and mandolins) so that the air brush / special finishing techniques are not required?
Here's my back and one side (the non-belly rubbed side):