Yep. The Marshall 412 stack was designed for Entwistle afaik. The SVT was a guitar and bass rig for the Stones afaik when it came out.John Entwistle happened.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yep. The Marshall 412 stack was designed for Entwistle afaik. The SVT was a guitar and bass rig for the Stones afaik when it came out.John Entwistle happened.
Yep. The Marshall 412 stack was designed for Entwistle afaik. The SVT was a guitar and bass rig for the Stones afaik when it came out.
Designed for the Who under Pete's direction. Entwistle also used Marshalls during the same periods in the 60's.Designed for Townshend, not Entwistle. In fact, he originally asked for/demanded an 8x12 cabinet. In an interview conducted a couple of years before he died, Jim Marshall said that he tried to persuade Townshend that the Who's roadies would have a hard time moving those cabinets. Townshend replied, "Sod em! They get paid."
Evidently he quickly changed his mind, since only a couple of the 8x12 cabs were ever built.
Designed for the Who under Pete's direction. Entwistle also used Marshalls during the same periods in the 60's.
This might be somewhat true if you substituted '1940s' for '1960s', but even in the rural Texas farm town where I grew up there was adequate electrical distribution in houses well before WWII. Even folks who lived on farms out in the sticks had at least some electricity. How much power do you think a modern 300-watt amp takes? But you're right that rural electrification was very much a product of the New Deal, at least here in Texas. Lyndon Johnson built his career early on by promising to bring 'the lights' to the hard-scrabble farmers and ranchers of the Texas Hill Country and was able to deliver on that promise.I suspect that if you brought a modern 300-watt bass amp back in time to the 1960s, there would have been few places you could have plugged it into without blowing lots of fuses.
Yeah, I have had little success finding out how MUCH electrical power the average American home had on hand immediately after WWII. It wasn't much before that, mainly because i don't think that there were lots of affordable appliances that used lots of electricity, primarily refrigerators and electric ovens/ranges. I'd love to find out more about this.This might be somewhat true if you substituted '1940s' for '1960s', but even in the rural Texas farm town where I grew up there was adequate electrical distribution in houses well before WWII. Even folks who lived on farms out in the sticks had at least some electricity. How much power do you think a modern 300-watt amp takes? But you're right that rural electrification was very much a product of the New Deal, at least here in Texas. Lyndon Johnson built his career early on by promising to bring 'the lights' to the hard-scrabble farmers and ranchers of the Texas Hill Country and was able to deliver on that promise.
I had never considered it because I'm not as enamored of big tube amps as some folks, but I guess the size of a class-AB tube amp is constrained by 15-amp branch circuits to no more than 4 pairs of output tubes, or less than ~400 watts of output power. And yeah, you probably would have had to make some special allowances to plug something like that in at my Mam-maw'splace out in the country in the early '60s, where electricity was available but not unlimited.
This is all covered in the individual bio's for the 4 members. I have read all of them."Designed for the Who under Pete's direction" is splitting hairs. Of course Entwistle would have used the Marshall stacks too, but Jim Marshall didn't mention Entwistle during the interview.
In the same interview, Marshall mentioned that the Tremoloes were one of the first bands to buy the stacks after the Who. He recalled standing at the back of a ballroom where the Tremoloes were playing and being impressed by how clear the guitar sound was, thanks to the slanted top cabinet projecting the full range of the guitar's output over the heads of the dancers.
That was an accidental benefit. He said that he'd slanted the front of the top cabinet simply because he thought it would look better to give the head and the top of the cabinet the same depth.
The Rural Electrification Act’s effect began in the late 1930’s and slowed down during WW2. About 1/2 of all American farms had access to electricity after WW2 and most had electricity by the late 1950’s.Yeah, I have had little success finding out how MUCH electrical power the average American home had on hand immediately after WWII. It wasn't much before that, mainly because i don't think that there were lots of affordable appliances that used lots of electricity, primarily refrigerators and electric ovens/ranges. I'd love to find out more about this.
Something to bear in mind. Many bassists didn't play that low in those days due to vinyl recordings, AM radio, playback systems and upright bass technique.
Low bass frequencies used up a lot of headroom in the cutting process and could cause the needle to jump out of the groove - likewise AM radio wasn't great with low frequencies either, so it was generally high-passed. Not to mention, most people's record players didn't reproduce bass frequencies very well.
Many bassists started out playing upright - unamplified. So they had developed techniques to cut through a mix of guitars and drums such playing further up the neck.
As such, a lot of bassists continued to play basslines further up the neck with a more mid-range tone to cut through and ensure they didn't cause recording and playback problems. An open-back guitar cab could reproduce a typical 50s/60s bassline in a live environment okay.
PS, I've heard several stories of whole bands plugging into a single AC30
in 1987, My first "good" amp was a Peavey TNT 300. It was great, I thought, and loud enough. About 200 pounds..Just for a different perspective, the kids like me who were learning bass in the 80s had a bit of an advantage with the availability of Peavy combos. They didn’t sound all that great, but they were less expensive than what guys 10 years before us had to choose from and you could actually play loud enough to play with a band. You just about couldn’t break them, either. I started with one of those and soon “regressed” to an old Ampeg V4 and a 1x 15 cab. That sounded a lot better. I got into some weird rack stuff in the late 80s, but that’s beside the point.
One of my bass students is still using the TNT 300. It really is a great amp.in 1987, My first "good" amp was a Peavey TNT 300. It was great, I thought, and loud enough. About 200 pounds..