• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Casey Anthony Mask

I'm just upset that I didn't think to have the masks made, and sell them. I'da been Rich.

You coulda done like the Michael Myers mask (a white spray painted william shatner mask) and gotten a generic female face mask, applied some whorish makeup (think Homer Simpson's make-up shotgun) and made a schlocky B-move, Where's My Kid: The Casey Anthony Story. There'd be your millions!
 
You coulda done like the Michael Myers mask (a white spray painted william shatner mask) and gotten a generic female face mask, applied some whorish makeup (think Homer Simpson's make-up shotgun) and made a schlocky B-move, Where's My Kid: The Casey Anthony Story. There'd be your millions!

Don't hold your breath....I'm sure some soulless reaver is working on it as we speak.

I won't be holding my breath waiting for someone to pony up almost a million bucks for that mask either.
 
got-99-problems-but-a-caylee-aint-one.jpg
 
CASEY ANTHONY LATEX RUBBER MASK EXT. RARE - eBay (item 260823841484 end time Jul-27-11 18:00:34 PDT)

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but if not, what are your thoughts? Not sure if the winning buyer is actually goiing to pay that much for it, but that's insane!!

My thoughts?
Well you asked for it...
WHO CARES????
Why do we prop these people up? If it isn't Casey Anthony, it is OctoMom, or Charlie Sheen, or the Kardashians...etc.
God, the more publicity we give them the worse it gets.
:spit:
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
But out of curiosity - why? When we see these media spectacles, it's very hard to not form an opinion. That, plus we have all heard of innocent folks being locked up and guilty folks walking.... it happens, so what makes it so wrong to question a verdict?
Sincere question, no sarcasm or snarkiness intended.

Sorry to take so long to get around to answering. Rehearsal last night.........


I think it's wrong because we don't have all the information that the jury does and what information we have has been adulterated by the media. The jury not only has more information but they have first-hand experience with the people involved and can judge their credibility where we can't.

I just don't think someone who hasn't been in the courtroom and heard all the testimony first-hand and had a chance to size up the witnesses is in any position to monday morning quarterback.

My comment about it being sad was really pointed at the fact that so many people are willing to take up an opinion, or believe something to be true, just because they heard it on the T.V.
 
Sorry to take so long to get around to answering. Rehearsal last night.........


I think it's wrong because we don't have all the information that the jury does and what information we have has been adulterated by the media. The jury not only has more information but they have first-hand experience with the people involved and can judge their credibility where we can't.

I just don't think someone who hasn't been in the courtroom and heard all the testimony first-hand and had a chance to size up the witnesses is in any position to monday morning quarterback.

My comment about it being sad was really pointed at the fact that so many people are willing to take up an opinion, or believe something to be true, just because they heard it on the T.V.

Thanks for taking the time to explain. I get that, I really do and I fully agree that any opinion where not all of the facts are known is trumped by the opinions of those better informed.
No argument from me there:)

Let's completely leave the media out of this for a moment, because they really aren't in the news business they are in the entertainment/shock and outrage business.

In this instance my point is not at all that I somehow know better, it's rather that based on what I do know, and based upon what this one juror - someone who DOES know better than me - was saying about feeling that "she WAS guilty but not having enough to prove it beyond the shadow of a doubt" leaves me to question the verdict.
We have all heard of folks wrongly convicted, and we've all heard of the guilty going free - the legal system is not perfect. It works, but it's not 100%, absolutely, positively and unquestionably right every time. With that in mind, I think it may have been the case here where the guilty walked.
 
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I get that, I really do and I fully agree that any opinion where not all of the facts are known is trumped by the opinions of those better informed.
No argument from me there:)

Let's completely leave the media out of this for a moment, because they really aren't in the news business they are in the entertainment/shock and outrage business.

In this instance my point is not at all that I somehow know better, it's rather that based on what I do know, and based upon what this one juror - someone who DOES know better than me - was saying about feeling that "she WAS guilty but not having enough to prove it beyond the shadow of a doubt" leaves me to question the verdict.
We have all heard of folks wrongly convicted, and we've all heard of the guilty going free - the legal system is not perfect. It works, but it's not 100%, absolutely, positively and unquestionably right every time. With that in mind, I think it may have been the case here where the guilty walked.

Okay I see what you're saying and agree you're not second guessing the jury.

If the jurors felt she was guilty but acquitted her anyway because the evidence didn't prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt then the they did what they were supposed to do and should be applauded for it.

You're right the legal system has problems. Sometimes we lock up the innocent and sometimes a guilty person walks. Hopefully, because we ask for very high standard of proof we don't lock up innocent people too often (I say that knowing we probably lock up the wrong guy more often than anyone would ever want to admit).
 
Okay I see what you're saying and agree you're not second guessing the jury.

If the jurors felt she was guilty but acquitted her anyway because the evidence didn't prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt then the they did what they were supposed to do and should be applauded for it.

Im of a similar mind as Relic on the matter. I think she is in some way responsible for the death of her child, but I also agree that the jury handed out the correct verdict.


My wife asked me, yesterday, a question she heard asked earlier on the radio... If you had to choose, who would you rather have move in next door to you... Casey Anthony, Mike Tyson, or Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino?
 
Definitely Tyson though the sitch would be endlessly hilarious.

They should have made the mask of her showing emotion when she got off the hook. It would be more collectible due to its rarity. I bet the bid for the mask never gets paid though.

I read in the news that she is getting a half mil offer by Mr Flint to be in his magazine and another mil by some other mag to hook up to a lie detector. The offers are starting to pour in! :confused: She will be rich in no time.
 
I read in the news that she is getting a half mil offer by Mr Flint to be in his magazine and another mil by some other mag to hook up to a lie detector. The offers are starting to pour in! :confused: She will be rich in no time.

There was an article on TMZ, briefly, about her being offered, I think $5 mil, to do a porno for Vivid. I think some angry people contacted Vivid, and the next day they rescinded their offer and apologized to the public.