hey folks, in keeping with my desire to learn, i've been doing a little reading and looking at chambered bodies.
I started with an assumption the ultimate goal was a lighter bass but i also thought it would be vital to overall instrument balance in regards to the dreaded neck dive thing as to how much was removed from where. Lastly i wondered just how chambered a body could be and still handle the stress of string tension over time.
Oddly enough, a visit to Warmoth and a perusal of available raw bass bodies revealed little if any significant weight savings in chambered versus conventional bodies but the cost difference was pretty significant, especially when considering the (relative to cost) tiny loss of weight. Is weight so important to so many that it's worth a significant increase in price for a few saved ounces?
As for the location of removal and amount of wood removed, in my albeit limited reading up, i can find no trend, rule of thumb, or any other consistent factor that might govern this aspect of chambering.
So is chambering truly a worthy improvement that would benefit solid body bassdom as a whole, or is it akin to Tide changing the size of their individual soap granules simply to justify their claim of a "new and improved" version of an already proved good and worthy concept.
While i have no designs on a chamberd bass, like Emil Faber, i too believe knowlege is good.
Thanks in advance for any and all info.
I started with an assumption the ultimate goal was a lighter bass but i also thought it would be vital to overall instrument balance in regards to the dreaded neck dive thing as to how much was removed from where. Lastly i wondered just how chambered a body could be and still handle the stress of string tension over time.
Oddly enough, a visit to Warmoth and a perusal of available raw bass bodies revealed little if any significant weight savings in chambered versus conventional bodies but the cost difference was pretty significant, especially when considering the (relative to cost) tiny loss of weight. Is weight so important to so many that it's worth a significant increase in price for a few saved ounces?
As for the location of removal and amount of wood removed, in my albeit limited reading up, i can find no trend, rule of thumb, or any other consistent factor that might govern this aspect of chambering.
So is chambering truly a worthy improvement that would benefit solid body bassdom as a whole, or is it akin to Tide changing the size of their individual soap granules simply to justify their claim of a "new and improved" version of an already proved good and worthy concept.
While i have no designs on a chamberd bass, like Emil Faber, i too believe knowlege is good.
Thanks in advance for any and all info.
Last edited: