toad-licking dunderhead.
![]()
Dude, I'm stealing this and am going to use it as soon as I can

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
toad-licking dunderhead.
![]()

This is why I come to the forum.....to share my wisdom and knowledge. (stares off to the horizon at a 32 degree angle)Dude, I'm stealing this and am going to use it as soon as I can![]()
They would have paid you with or without chords. Quite possibly you lost a bonus doing such tomfoolery.Quite false. I’ve strummed a few and collected my pay at the end of the night.
Then got hired back the next month.
You've never played a power chord? Add the octave. If the root is on the e string, only play the fifth and octave.I am relatively new to bass, but as my name implies, I work hard on theory. I have always heard that you don't strum chords on a bass because it gets "muddy". However to get the harmonics right, the bass will play a chord as an arpeggio. This is the entire theory behind walking bass lines.
A friend suggested that I try and play Bourree by J.S.Bach, as recorded by Jethro Tull.
I looked up the tabs, and saw to my amazement that the bass solo ends with about ten measures of all bass chords. Jethro Tull plays them as strummed chords, however as written by Bach, they are just the root and the 5th played simultaneously. I had never tried that before.
OMG the sound that they produce is utterly amazing. It results in such a beautiful fullness of tone. The only thing that approaches it musically is playing Chords on a harp. But of course the harp isn't known for such a low end, It just doesn't carry well.
Why aren't simple two note chords like these played more often on the bass. I have actually started to work on walking bass lines involving them... (Chord)-1st-3rd-5th...
or when chords change... (Chord)-1st-5th-(chord)-(new chord)-1st-3rd-5th.. etcetera. and various permutations of these. Now I have to get my 5 string semi-hollow body built to try them at the really low end. Although to avoid muddiness below low-E I might nee to play root and seventh, or some other variation.
From experience what do you all think.
I am relatively new to bass, but as my name implies, I work hard on theory. I have always heard that you don't strum chords on a bass because it gets "muddy". However to get the harmonics right, the bass will play a chord as an arpeggio. This is the entire theory behind walking bass lines.
A friend suggested that I try and play Bourree by J.S.Bach, as recorded by Jethro Tull.
I looked up the tabs, and saw to my amazement that the bass solo ends with about ten measures of all bass chords. Jethro Tull plays them as strummed chords, however as written by Bach, they are just the root and the 5th played simultaneously. I had never tried that before.
OMG the sound that they produce is utterly amazing. It results in such a beautiful fullness of tone. The only thing that approaches it musically is playing Chords on a harp. But of course the harp isn't known for such a low end, It just doesn't carry well.
Why aren't simple two note chords like these played more often on the bass. I have actually started to work on walking bass lines involving them... (Chord)-1st-3rd-5th...
or when chords change... (Chord)-1st-5th-(chord)-(new chord)-1st-3rd-5th.. etcetera. and various permutations of these. Now I have to get my 5 string semi-hollow body built to try them at the really low end. Although to avoid muddiness below low-E I might nee to play root and seventh, or some other variation.
From experience what do you all think.
I am relatively new to bass, but as my name implies, I work hard on theory. I have always heard that you don't strum chords on a bass because it gets "muddy". However to get the harmonics right, the bass will play a chord as an arpeggio. This is the entire theory behind walking bass lines.
A friend suggested that I try and play Bourree by J.S.Bach, as recorded by Jethro Tull.
I looked up the tabs, and saw to my amazement that the bass solo ends with about ten measures of all bass chords. Jethro Tull plays them as strummed chords, however as written by Bach, they are just the root and the 5th played simultaneously. I had never tried that before.
OMG the sound that they produce is utterly amazing. It results in such a beautiful fullness of tone. The only thing that approaches it musically is playing Chords on a harp. But of course the harp isn't known for such a low end, It just doesn't carry well.
Why aren't simple two note chords like these played more often on the bass. I have actually started to work on walking bass lines involving them... (Chord)-1st-3rd-5th...
or when chords change... (Chord)-1st-5th-(chord)-(new chord)-1st-3rd-5th.. etcetera. and various permutations of these. Now I have to get my 5 string semi-hollow body built to try them at the really low end. Although to avoid muddiness below low-E I might nee to play root and seventh, or some other variation.
From experience what do you all think.
I am relatively new to bass, but as my name implies, I work hard on theory. I have always heard that you don't strum chords on a bass because it gets "muddy". However to get the harmonics right, the bass will play a chord as an arpeggio. This is the entire theory behind walking bass lines.
A friend suggested that I try and play Bourree by J.S.Bach, as recorded by Jethro Tull.
I looked up the tabs, and saw to my amazement that the bass solo ends with about ten measures of all bass chords. Jethro Tull plays them as strummed chords, however as written by Bach, they are just the root and the 5th played simultaneously. I had never tried that before.
OMG the sound that they produce is utterly amazing. It results in such a beautiful fullness of tone. The only thing that approaches it musically is playing Chords on a harp. But of course the harp isn't known for such a low end, It just doesn't carry well.
Why aren't simple two note chords like these played more often on the bass. I have actually started to work on walking bass lines involving them... (Chord)-1st-3rd-5th...
or when chords change... (Chord)-1st-5th-(chord)-(new chord)-1st-3rd-5th.. etcetera. and various permutations of these. Now I have to get my 5 string semi-hollow body built to try them at the really low end. Although to avoid muddiness below low-E I might nee to play root and seventh, or some other variation.
From experience what do you all think.
Ian Anderson is the talking flute guy. Jethro Tull is the band.Glenn Cornick played bass on that one. Jethro Tull is the talking flute guy.
I think his dad invented the cotton gin?
Context is key. In most typical ensembles the understanding will be that the chords will be supplied by either a guitar or a keyboard and that the bass will be busy playing single notes which underpin the harmony and help provide a strong rhythmic element. In such contexts playing chords on bass is likely to step on what the chordal instruments are doing and detract from what the bass is "supposed" to be doing. But that doesn't mean there can't be a time and place for some tasteful chordal playing. And, of course, if you are participating in an original project then you can arrange things any way you want. Tenths are great because they allow you to space your double stops out in a way that means you can maintain the low end and also add some flavour up top (with a big enough interval that things are unlikely to get too muddy).
Regardless, I would strongly encourage you to learn to play chords on your bass. It will help solidify your knowledge of harmony and it's really fun to be able to sit down with a song and be able to play every aspect of it (chords, bass line, melody). My last electric bass teacher was really into chordal playing and I learned a lot from that approach.
I use double stops and chords all the time.I am relatively new to bass, but as my name implies, I work hard on theory. I have always heard that you don't strum chords on a bass because it gets "muddy". However to get the harmonics right, the bass will play a chord as an arpeggio. This is the entire theory behind walking bass lines.
A friend suggested that I try and play Bourree by J.S.Bach, as recorded by Jethro Tull.
I looked up the tabs, and saw to my amazement that the bass solo ends with about ten measures of all bass chords. Jethro Tull plays them as strummed chords, however as written by Bach, they are just the root and the 5th played simultaneously. I had never tried that before.
OMG the sound that they produce is utterly amazing. It results in such a beautiful fullness of tone. The only thing that approaches it musically is playing Chords on a harp. But of course the harp isn't known for such a low end, It just doesn't carry well.
Why aren't simple two note chords like these played more often on the bass. I have actually started to work on walking bass lines involving them... (Chord)-1st-3rd-5th...
or when chords change... (Chord)-1st-5th-(chord)-(new chord)-1st-3rd-5th.. etcetera. and various permutations of these. Now I have to get my 5 string semi-hollow body built to try them at the really low end. Although to avoid muddiness below low-E I might nee to play root and seventh, or some other variation.
From experience what do you all think.