Honestly i dont no y he has hype ppl always try and explain it to me but i just never thot he was that good tome it always seems like certain musicians are only big cuz they died with cliff in there and dimebag derrell
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The Call Of Ktulu
amazing what cliff wrote.
you wanted vids?
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=6O9zMnwD65Q
WATCH IT!!!!!!
Because whenever someone dies they're considered 10 times better than they were when they die.
As far as tightness, groove, and maturity goes, the best thing ever to happen to Metallica was Rob Trujillo.
AlphaMale said:Because whenever someone dies they're considered 10 times better than they were when they die.
Ramstein said:Aka Dimebag Darrel.

You will understand Cliff Burton, when you realize music is not a compliation of single instruments playing together, but a collaboration of emotions represented by musicians.
Cliff Burton was not the best, nor - forgive me when I say - the cleverest, but he is one of the architects of the music genre you still are listening today, including Linkin Park or Dream Theater. Please do not come with "but linkin park is not a trash metal band". I know that![]()
The first solo reminds me of this solo
i really don't get why poeple like burton so much either. It always seems to be more about what he was a part of than what he was able to play. I think the fact that he died when metalica were at their peak has a lot to do with his popularity
Aka Dimebag Darrel.
Honestly i dont no y he has hype ppl always try and explain it to me but i just never thot he was that good tome it always seems like certain musicians are only big cuz they died with cliff in there and dimebag derrell

Excuse me but Dime was one of the greatest when he was alive, Only big cuz he's dead, learn about what you are talking about!
THe coolest thing about Cliff was his stage presence. IMHO.
Metallica was never about tightness, GROOVE or maturity. When they hit, they were a bunch of 21 year old kids playing as fast and as hard as they could. The had a splash of melody here and there between the vodka and Heineken-fueled fury. There was no time for groove and maturity in what they were playing. I agree Trujillo fits in with Lars, Kirk and James now, but Cliff fit in with Metallica.
Really, one of the best things I've read in this thread. Metallica is no longer Metallica. How long had it been since all members contributed to a song? "Enter Sandman?" 17 years? And how long has it been since Metallica put out a complete, solid record? Not since a Mustaine or a Burton was in the band.
keep in mind i doubt that a large % of the people on this forum are NOT metal fans I would guess quite the opposite AND besides the occasional person saying his solos were boring nobody has said X bassline was bad (nor will theyBurton was an okay bassist.
He was an adequate bassist.
I get it now.
There was no hidden solo I had not heard or anything.
And most people like him because he was in Metallica or Because he died, or because he looked cool.
I'm glad I understand it now. I don't think anyone has brought it up but Cliff was one of the first to be eliminated from the best bassist game.
Burton was an okay bassist.
He was an adequate bassist.
I get it now.
There was no hidden solo I had not heard or anything.
And most people like him because he was in Metallica or Because he died, or because he looked cool.
I'm glad I understand it now. I don't think anyone has brought it up but Cliff was one of the first to be eliminated from the best bassist game.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with this? "and i grew up in NYC where stuff was easier to find." would seem to buttress my point, not disprove it.
Anyway, someone else is going to have to take up defending 'ol Cliff. Its been fun, but....
Peace.![]()
Metallica was never about tightness, GROOVE or maturity. When they hit, they were a bunch of 21 year old kids playing as fast and as hard as they could. The had a splash of melody here and there between the vodka and Heineken-fueled fury. There was no time for groove and maturity in what they were playing. I agree Trujillo fits in with Lars, Kirk and James now, but Cliff fit in with Metallica.
More like Kurt Cobain. At the very least, Pantera kept metal alive if they didn't outright saved it.
Pantera kept metal alive? COME ON, any person who knows ANYTHING couldn't make such a blanketly ******** and superficial statement.
What exactly did Pantera keep alive? Viking metal and Black metal at the beginning and mid 90's was boojming, Bathory and Quothorn's acts were massive and the following amazing, progressive metal such as Pain of salvation and DT was gaining popularity, Opeth started, Alchemist started, hell even tool was just as popular as Pantera (if your going to call them metal), I'm sick of people treating Pantera like demi gods.
The band was nothing special, just because they gained popularity does not equate to genius, musical integrity or some kind of post death fanboyism that follows the word 'dime' everytime its posted.
Pantera were fine, they do not deserve their credit and there were much more influential, important and bands of higher quality. Certainly they didn't 'save' metal from whatever imagined fate your implying.
What did Pantera's legacy leave behind? Trivium, KsE. What did Bathory's? Gorgoroth, Opeth, Viking metal as a genre and finntroll.
Check and mate.