• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

images(2).jpeg


I see now... the extra knob for a 4 could be placed where the jack hole is for the 3, hence the jack side placement for the 4. Occupies the same space, but you have to accommodate the extra knob and jack placement, so it would require some skills... I have a few, but would still not drill into that bass...

... if your bass isn't a Sadowsky, well... dilly, dilly! Drill away!
 
  • Like
Reactions: maplenecked
Thanks for the thoughts. I was just on the Sadowsky site, looks like I could just get this new smaller SBP-2 just to see how I like how the preamp sounds with this bass. I really don’t need all the features the SBP-1 has for this purpose. I’m really not a pedal guy but this makes sense as it’s an experimental purpose rather than running like bull into the china shop.

@RNG1 : I don't have much to add but know that I am following the discussion closely as I am grappling with the same decisions. I have several bases and the most recent is a Sadowsky 5/21. It is (finally) the sound I am looking for and I would also like to have a 4 string version. I am really really tempted to buy one of the new Metro Express models but do I want to drop $1875 on a new bass right after paying for my custom NYC 5/21? ... ouch.

I am also tempted to just move up to the Satin series because I feel like I would get a better weight by doing so. I could sell some of my current bases to offset the cost - that includes a Squier VM Jazz 5, SBMM Ray 34, Sire V7 4, G&L JB2 Tribute, and I am even considering parting with a Fender Elite P that I love the passive sound of but am on-again/off-again with the active sound.

Ah, but then there is just buying the onboard preamp... I looked into putting it into the G&L JB2 tribute... could probably do the 3 knob version but would have to route a place for the battery, but then the preamp would be worth as much as the entire bass alone. I have also thought about replacing the preamp in the fender Elite-P, but then what does that do the resale value, and do I care?

Then of course there is the outboard preamp SBP-2 option, which would potentially allow me to get the Sadowsky sound with all of the basses I own (maybe, but does it really?)

I have been going back and forth with all these options for the past 2 weeks. Not sure which way I will end up going but if it were a decision I had to make today it would be to sell off some of the basses mentioned above (which I likely will not play much in the future) and buy a satin series Sadowsky 4.

Let me know which route you end up taking.
 
@RNG1 : I don't have much to add but know that I am following the discussion closely as I am grappling with the same decisions. I have several bases and the most recent is a Sadowsky 5/21. It is (finally) the sound I am looking for and I would also like to have a 4 string version. I am really really tempted to buy one of the new Metro Express models but do I want to drop $1875 on a new bass right after paying for my custom NYC 5/21? ... ouch.

I am also tempted to just move up to the Satin series because I feel like I would get a better weight by doing so. I could sell some of my current bases to offset the cost - that includes a Squier VM Jazz 5, SBMM Ray 34, Sire V7 4, G&L JB2 Tribute, and I am even considering parting with a Fender Elite P that I love the passive sound of but am on-again/off-again with the active sound.

Ah, but then there is just buying the onboard preamp... I looked into putting it into the G&L JB2 tribute... could probably do the 3 knob version but would have to route a place for the battery, but then the preamp would be worth as much as the entire bass alone. I have also thought about replacing the preamp in the fender Elite-P, but then what does that do the resale value, and do I care?

Then of course there is the outboard preamp SBP-2 option, which would potentially allow me to get the Sadowsky sound with all of the basses I own (maybe, but does it really?)

I have been going back and forth with all these options for the past 2 weeks. Not sure which way I will end up going but if it were a decision I had to make today it would be to sell off some of the basses mentioned above (which I likely will not play much in the future) and buy a satin series Sadowsky 4.

Let me know which route you end up taking.


Sounds like we could benefit from sharing the same therapist if they allow a joint session...

I decided (for the moment) to pick up the lessser expensive SBP-2 which is pretty reasonable and I’ve even seen on TB. Reasoning is it will at least give me an idea of what this particular bass would sound like and the easiest way to get there. Then I’ll likely add that to the $10,000 pile of stuff I have around here that could have been the most amazing Sadowsky bass had I not monkeyed around with all this crap for the past several years.
There will ultimately be a metro express in my future to hopefully cure this disease ;)

I’ll let you know how the pedal turns out.
 
FWIW, the VTC may appear to be somewhat trivial; but, IME, that control is worth it’s weight in gold. Here’s why: in the larger spectrum of tones available with the Sadowsky preamp, you get a lot of higher freqs, which though useful for certain tones, can create the impression of being too “modern.” Since so many important bass tones are “old school,” having the VTC lets you get those as well. Extremely important and effective, if apparently trivial. Which it isn’t. I think quite a few Sadowsky players would agree with this as being consensus.

So, that abbreviated preamp is really aimed at basses that have some kind of collector value; and where the player may want a reversibly swapable preamp on a collectible passive bass. If your instrument is not a collector piece and you gig it, I would strongly recommend the regular onboard, bite the bullet, and drill and route as needed. Great luthiers, like Pat Wilkins, can do this for very reasonable cost, and it will be done right. Here are my two “Fendowsky’s:”

42DE4753-10D7-4817-A164-CEE54E032369.jpeg

3505C403-6AFB-4553-B925-D83599DFF9A0.jpeg
 
GREAT looking bass! I have no doubt Pat Wilkins can fix you right up with the standard preamp in that puppy.

Yeah thanks! Actually the guy who finished this body for me is local so I can definitely have him do the side jack. I did the layout for these controls thinking ahead that I may want to put in a four knob control. I’ve seen Pat’s work, he does top notch work for sure.

I am aware of the uses of the VTC and I do believe that is something I will find effective for enhancing what I’m looking for in my head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
FWIW, the VTC may appear to be somewhat trivial; but, IME, that control is worth it’s weight in gold. Here’s why: in the larger spectrum of tones available with the Sadowsky preamp, you get a lot of higher freqs, which though useful for certain tones, can create the impression of being too “modern.” Since so many important bass tones are “old school,” having the VTC lets you get those as well. Extremely important and effective, if apparently trivial. Which it isn’t. I think quite a few Sadowsky players would agree with this as being consensus.

So, that abbreviated preamp is really aimed at basses that have some kind of collector value; and where the player may want a reversibly swapable preamp on a collectible passive bass. If your instrument is not a collector piece and you gig it, I would strongly recommend the regular onboard, bite the bullet, and drill and route as needed. Great luthiers, like Pat Wilkins, can do this for very reasonable cost, and it will be done right. Here are my two “Fendowsky’s:”

View attachment 2946107
View attachment 2946106

I can only imagine what those Delanos paired with the Sadowsky preamp sounds like. I can see why you would want two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
Curious what musical context you play mostly that you found this to be your sauce. Thanks
Mainly cover gigs, playing everything from Muddy Waters/Elvis to Bruno Mars/Timberlake. We do Motown, Journey, whatever people want to hear. I try to cop the vibe of the reference recording: pizzicato, plectrum, slap/thump; P, J etc. I just find this combination to offer the widest choices available. Old school, new school. Pretty much does it all for me. Back in my more Jazz Bass centric days, I was settled on the Seymour Duncan SJB-2 as the best single coil I ever found; and I still have those in my '62. Great passive characteristic Jazz bass pickups. the Delano's just do a whole lot more for me; and coupled with the Sadowsky preamp, I'm pretty much done looking around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holdsg and Nomogram
I can only imagine what those Delanos paired with the Sadowsky preamp sounds like. I can see why you would want two.
Yeah, duplication, right?

Well, I certainly have more bass guitars than I need. And I never intend to become any kind of collector. So, that kind of bugs me sometimes. I just have a hard time letting go of instruments and rigs that work well. I'm pretty agnostic on the 4 and 5 string thing; but, there are times when I prefer one over the other for technical reasons.

Also, there remain some distinct differences. For one thing, the 4 string J pickups just seem to have a little more heft to them than the 5 string versions of the same pickup. I went through the 5 string versions of the Sadowsky Seymour Duncans, Sadowsky Nordstrands, and Delanos on a WL5 I just sold; and thinking there was something wrong with the preamp, I sent the bass to Lisa, who rewired the entire preamp and checked it all out. I should mention that Roger, Lisa and the rest of the shop staff are some of the BEST people on Planet Bass. But, even after addressing the preamp Q, my 4 string basses just clobber the 5, in terms of hefty output. Now, you can just turn the input gain up a little more with the 5 strings; but, the difference is there. Stuff like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holdsg
Hello, do you know why Sadowsky specifically uses hum cancelling pups instead of single coil pups in the Metroline Series, is there any special think that I missed ? And is there any chance to swap from hum cancelling to single coil pups when ordering Metroline, thank you !
 
FWIW, the VTC may appear to be somewhat trivial; but, IME, that control is worth it’s weight in gold. Here’s why: in the larger spectrum of tones available with the Sadowsky preamp, you get a lot of higher freqs, which though useful for certain tones, can create the impression of being too “modern.” Since so many important bass tones are “old school,” having the VTC lets you get those as well. Extremely important and effective, if apparently trivial. Which it isn’t. I think quite a few Sadowsky players would agree with this as being consensus.

So, that abbreviated preamp is really aimed at basses that have some kind of collector value; and where the player may want a reversibly swapable preamp on a collectible passive bass. If your instrument is not a collector piece and you gig it, I would strongly recommend the regular onboard, bite the bullet, and drill and route as needed. Great luthiers, like Pat Wilkins, can do this for very reasonable cost, and it will be done right. Here are my two “Fendowsky’s:”

View attachment 2946107
View attachment 2946106

I know I've said it before... love the white one, @bucephylus!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus