• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

If I ever go back to fivers, I'll kick myself mercilessly for having sold that one. Chris ended up with a REALLY sweet bass -- that thing had the most amazing tone. Best 5-string Jazz I've ever played, hands down.

Well, I will make sure to let you know if I ever decide to let this one go. Please don't hold your breath though, this thing is truly one of the most amazing basses I have ever laid my hands on.
 
What are your thoughts about the alder/brz PJ5? I'm not a big JJ fan, instead preferring the increased meat of the PJ.

Well the PJ alder/brz is way fatter than the MV5 JJ.
It is due to both the PUs and the wood combo.

As someone noted earlier, mee too, I have the feeling that alder/brz is brighter in the upper treble region as opposed to the upper mids with the ash/maple combo.
But the PJ has thicker low mids, therefore is fatter and as I am concerned has a better pick sound!
 
...Hmmmm...actually ...yes ( ducks for cover...) I was, well, am planning on caramel burst with a tortoise pickguard... with the Birds eye Maple neck that should look grand... But I must admist that I have been zooming the picture for quite some time to see which parts the pickguard would cover... am I in need for therapy?

I went through that same debate, but in the end, I am glad that I went with a pickguard on my P/J 5. :cool:
 
Well the PJ alder/brz is way fatter than the MV5 JJ.
It is due to both the PUs and the wood combo.

As someone noted earlier, mee too, I have the feeling that alder/brz is brighter in the upper treble region as opposed to the upper mids with the ash/maple combo.
But the PJ has thicker low mids, therefore is fatter and as I am concerned has a better pick sound!


+1

The top end response of those two wood combinations are interesting, and it really is a matter of semantics (i.e., how do you define 'bright').

The alder/RW (especially the NYC 'true rosewood' models) actually seem to have a bit of dip in the upper mids, resulting in some 'space' between the mids and the treble (like some bass cabs). This results in the basses not sounding 'bright' through the upper mids and lower treble, but rather full and fat down low, and a bit sizzly up top, with that upper treble sitting out there by its lonesome (especially with the somewhat scooped voicing of the stock HC pickups).

Ash/maple has a real bump in that 'ganky' 1K to 2K area to my ear, making those basses sound 'bright' (i.e., grindy and very present in the upper mids), which masks the sizzle a bit.

So, depending on how you define 'bright' (i.e., aggressive upper mids, or extended high treble), they both can be!

My alder/Madagascar RW Sadowksy JJ was among the sizzliest basses I've ever owned. My ash/maple with Sadowsky singles is much more punchy, and the combination of the punchier singles through the mids and that maple board make it growl and snarl versus the 'warm, smooth with sizzle' voicing of the alder/RW.

IMO... hard to talk about this stuff in general terms sometimes:)
 
Yeah, I think one guys "bright" is another guy's "sizzle." I think one reason I'm not a big JJ fan is that 1-2K gank/clack. I do like the hi freq sizzle of a rw board, and that with the fatness of the PJ gives me a more supportive low mid as opposed to what I find a more "out front" of the JJ.

Seems that going ash/rw on the NYC PJ might be a bit of a risk (for some reason I feel like ash is a bit more "hollow"), whereas the alder/rw NYC PJ should be more of a "known quantity" relative to my Metro RV5PJ.
 
...Hmmmm...actually ...yes ( ducks for cover...) I was, well, am planning on caramel burst with a tortoise pickguard... with the Birds eye Maple neck that should look grand... But I must admist that I have been zooming the picture for quite some time to see which parts the pickguard would cover... am I in need for therapy?

Sorry, I'm just really into natural finishes (especially on NYCs, and especially when the grain is as delicious as what you have there) and nice wood in general. The idea of covering up such gorgeous wood with a pickguard just seems like shame to me. But hey - that's just my taste! Whatever you decide, you'll still have a killer bass there and if it looks good to you then you're set. I'm not even a quilt guy but that top is something special.
 
What are your thoughts about the alder/brz PJ5? I'm not a big JJ fan, instead preferring the increased meat of the PJ.

+1

The top end response of those two wood combinations are interesting, and it really is a matter of semantics (i.e., how do you define 'bright').

The alder/RW (especially the NYC 'true rosewood' models) actually seem to have a bit of dip in the upper mids, resulting in some 'space' between the mids and the treble (like some bass cabs). This results in the basses not sounding 'bright' through the upper mids and lower treble, but rather full and fat down low, and a bit sizzly up top, with that upper treble sitting out there by its lonesome (especially with the somewhat scooped voicing of the stock HC pickups).

Ash/maple has a real bump in that 'ganky' 1K to 2K area to my ear, making those basses sound 'bright' (i.e., grindy and very present in the upper mids), which masks the sizzle a bit.

So, depending on how you define 'bright' (i.e., aggressive upper mids, or extended high treble), they both can be!

My alder/Madagascar RW Sadowksy JJ was among the sizzliest basses I've ever owned. My ash/maple with Sadowsky singles is much more punchy, and the combination of the punchier singles through the mids and that maple board make it growl and snarl versus the 'warm, smooth with sizzle' voicing of the alder/RW.

IMO... hard to talk about this stuff in general terms sometimes:)

Firstly, Ken, I wish i had your ability to translate and express, in technical terms and words what you are hearing and how these elements effect tone. It's like "yeah, that's it" but when i turn around and try to 'splain these things it always falls a little short.

Nostatic, as i read your posts i wish there was a way for you to stop by and play this new ald/BRW PJ 5. (going to the Vancouver Olympics?) Aesthetically i gotta say the BrazRW does it for me. Definite eye candy and easy to fixate on. The body is the ultra vintage P body that Sadowsky offers and is perfectly balanced.

I am a little challenged trying to explain the tone difference between this bass and the 10 yr old ash/maple vintage 5str JJ. Suprisingly, I have noticed similarities as well as the obvious Precision rooted differences. The bridge pickups when singled have a similar sounding structure (aggressiveness, decay, etc.) to the notes but there is a definite warmer subharmonic(?) - (help me KJung)- undertone that is not there with the ash/m JJ. The P pickup when singled passive is just what you would expect to hear from a classic P BUT...with a little more thump, richer bottom end, more clarity and more sustain. Go active, start boosting bass/treble and this thing becomes an absolute tone monster. The bottom end becomes HUGE w/o being boomy and the upper register is still very pronounced. I have only had this guy for a couple of weeks but the live show feedback has been very good. I had trouble hearing some of the upper register notes but friends in the audience said thet heard them just fine. i'm sure much of this is me still trying to find the sweet spot. What i really like is the combination of clarity and thump produced by this bass. People in the audience have also commented on being able to feel it in their chest and still hear it very clearly. :D

Blended pickup positions are a whole other subject and it will probably be a while before i get a good grasp of what this instrument is capable of doing. I can say already that i have never played a bass that is this versatile. Now, add the VTC treble roll off feature....i'm gonna need another lifetime :p.

Hope this is helpful.
 
I wish I was going by Seattle. Instead it is Boston in 2 weeks and Ft. Lauderdale the week after.

I agree with what you're describing. My Metro PJ5 is alder/morado and it has the sound I'm looking for. Just to jumpstart your further play, I find that I spend most of my time near center blend, but usually biased towards the P pickup. I also run the VTC at about 50%. I also love the passive sound of the bass.

My sense is that alder/rw is where I'm at for the PJ - fat and warm with sizzle. I'm of the same mind with guitars actually. My favorite strats have always been alder/rw. Right now I have an ash/maple strat and I don't like it much - even though it has the same pickups that I had in a previous alder/rw strat that sounded great.

Different strokes. What was interesting at a gig on Sunday was I did one set with the Rob Allen 5 and another with the Zon Lightwave. Both great sounding basses, but totally different ways of sitting in the mix and supporting the sparse (guitar and harmonica) instrumentation. Funny how the different sounds drove my playing approach in different ways.
 
Different strokes. What was interesting at a gig on Sunday was I did one set with the Rob Allen 5 and another with the Zon Lightwave. Both great sounding basses, but totally different ways of sitting in the mix and supporting the sparse (guitar and harmonica) instrumentation. Funny how the different sounds drove my playing approach in different ways.

+1 !!! I used to toggle between a '65 P and the ash/maple JJ. Total mood change.
 
After making about 4000 basses, let me state the following. Please remember these are general findings and there are always exceptions as we are talking about wood!!!

ash body--brightest and tightest
alder body--sweeter and warmer, fuller in the mids
mahogany body--warm and round

maple fingerboard---the brightest--best for a MM slap sound
ebony---less bright than maple but the punchiest--onset of note is more immediate
morado---brighter than common east indian rosewood but still warmer than maple or ebony
madagascar---very close to brazilian in tone and looks. More available and less expensive.
brazilian--almost completely gone. the king of fingerboard woods IMHO. I have good inventory. Warm, solid and round.

roger

Thank you for posting that. It's very helpful. Saved to file.
 
I love my Sadowskys.

My Will Lee with Ash/Braz and SC
IMG_1508.jpg

IMG_1507.jpg



This new addition to my arsenal is completely out of this world. Especially for a Metro. It is by far the best playing bass I've ever owned.
I don't understand why SteveC sold it to me but I'm glad.
100_1336-1.jpg

IMG_1521.jpg


This one is Ash/Madagascar with HC.

5099_full_lg.jpg

IMG_1462.jpg