• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

Mahogany body on a single coil loaded J Bass... that's like chocolate sauce on Prime Rib.... just say no:p Next thing you know, you will put wooden knobs and a fancy top on it!

Nice!!! I don't know what it is, but I cannot stand mahogany basses. My old Fodera and my first MTD had mahogany bodies and they just left a sour taste in my mouth. But... chocolate sauce on Prime Rib!!! Yes!!!!!! :D
 
Anyway, I guess the point of the spec is that Will digs it.

That's pretty much it right there. This is what Will Lee chose, and what Roger and he drew up over some experimentation.

Will Lee.

I'm pretty sure he knows what he's doing. :p

FWIW, you can make the mid boost pronounced or subtle; there's a trim pot for how much boost you want. It's a nice bonus to have, and the genius is that once it's set, it's easy to turn on or off. No fiddling with knobs to get the blend right -- just two different flavors of kickass.
 
Ahhhhh, yes.......single coil greatness! Just came in the mail today. I trust these will rock nicely! :bassist:

FriMar05122444EST2010.jpg


These are going to be installed tonight into my Standard 5! :hyper:

DSC01884.jpg
 
Wouldn't a Will Lee 5 string just be a Sadowsky Vintage JJ5 with the mid boost switch? I guess I'm not seeing the big deal here. Maybe it has a tighter spacing at the nut or a different neck profile? I'm sure I'm missing something. I guess the 4 string had the detuner included and a more 'classic' nut width profile also.

Mike, just curious, what is it about this that makes you giddy? I'm not really up to speed on the WL model.

To be honest, it really doesn't make me all giddy, just an excuse to try and talk myself into a Sadowsky!

Your right, a JJ would do me just fine.
So, I have my old 88 Streamer posted and when it goes, I'll be on the hunt.

And *MAYBE* down the road bounce my 55-94D and jump up to a fancy NYC thingy.

But for now, I'm looking at something along a MV/RV4 (or 5 if the right one pops up).
 
hmm...wonder if SCs would make me a JJ fan. I never really liked the HC JJ setup...prefer the way the P colors/fattens the tone.

Its not enough of a difference IMO to make you somehow like the JJ sound. A JJ tone is a JJ tone with singles or Hum. Its doesn't become a different bass because you change from hums to singles.

I know I know. I like the singles better my self but I like the JJ tone to begin with.
 
Its not enough of a difference IMO to make you somehow like the JJ sound. A JJ tone is a JJ tone with singles or Hum. Its doesn't become a different bass because you change from hums to singles.

I know I know. I like the singles better my self but I like the JJ tone to begin with.

Yeah, I think it is just an inherent nature of the beast but a guy can dream. For whatever reason me and PJ are sitting in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g. Me and JJ keep ending up in divorce court.
 
Yeah, I think it is just an inherent nature of the beast but a guy can dream. For whatever reason me and PJ are sitting in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g. Me and JJ keep ending up in divorce court.
Yeah, I also agree with others on this, and I have all three examples, and all in the same ash/maple wood combo, so a good basis for tonal comparison... PJ, JJ/HC, and JJ/SC. The JJ/SC sounds nothing like the PJ. That P pickup makes a HUGE difference in the nature of the sound. HUGE. If you're a PJ guy, just stick with that.