TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
just making a quick post to contribute to the public knowledge base as a fyi for anyone who cares.After a bunch of gigs with the Keeley compressor this spring, I went back to my trusty Boss Bass EQ on a few jobs.
I felt that I was maybe missing a little something with the Boss, so I broke out the Keeley again. Glad I did. It seems to add just the right amount of vibe - but it's also super transparent at the same time.
I'm guess I'm using it more like a very subtle limiter and much less of a compressor. It feels good when I dig in, and it sounds great at just about any conservative setting.
Not trying to convince anyone (except maybe the OP) - but it's not that bad at all. I can see how some compressors could squish the snot out of an upright - but Keeley seems to have a winner here - at least for me.
just an fyi, im still using the keeley pro and liking it. i use my preamp in front of it for impedance and eq.I thought I'd bump this thread as I've been thinking about popping for a new compressor / limiter. (I did like the Keeley Bassist and probably should've kept it - but no biggie.)
Looking to use it with my new-to-me passive Fender P & GK rig - plus as a groovy front end for my Logic DAW. I also want something with the proper input impedance for a piezo (Full Circle) on upright on certain gigs.
Thinking about the Cali76 compact bass, Darkglass symmetry, or the FEA de-cl. All these units have glowing reviews for clean operation plus added "warmth" for a bit of tube-like sound.
I wish there was a store nearby where all these could be compared - but I guess that's what the TB classifieds are for!
If a compressor is "bad" for acoustic bass, why does an acoustically-focused company like Phil Jones make an amp with a compressor? I've got a Flightcase BG-150 coming in today for acoustic bass guitar and it has a compressor. I'll mess with it but not sure what to shoot for with that feature.
The flightless series have built in limiters on them to help protect the speakers. These limiters do a brilliant job. I got a Bass Buddy not too long ago, and found that it has a compressor instead of a limiter. I found the compressor completely useless both for BG and DB. As always, EEMMV
Reading the manual, that feature knob apparently is a compressor (fixed at 3:1 ratio) and a limiter. It says "Although a limiter is not essential to bass amplification, it can be a useful tool in smoothing out the character of your instrument or playing style." Not sure what that means but I'll try some knob twisting to find out.
I've never understood the general DB disdain for compression. I find compression very useful on DB, and on any instrument, find that an audible, "effect" level of compression to be inherently too much compression. As a tool for evening out electronic abnormalities that go with trying to reproduce the bass' natural acoustic sound (specifically between strings) I find compression to be invaluable. It should go without saying that most limiting and compressing should be done by the fingers, on EB or DB, but there is nothing worse than feeling stuck on the higher strings during a ballad, or stuck on the E string when thrashing up rhythm changes when you really want to be higher on the instrument, where acoustically the instrument would actually cut through the band better (on most basses); just generally pigeonholed to any range of the instrument based on the dynamic of the moment... Yes I know about HPFs, but HPF and subtle compression, now that will get you somewhere. I find compressors with a blend like the Seymour Duncan really useful in this regard; compression set fairly low and blend all or most of the way up to preserve the uncompressed signal.
Agree! Curious to know which you put first in the signal chain?HPF and subtle compression
I've had issues of my bass getting way too loud when I switched to arco. I always wondered if compression would help that.
Like anything, it depends on the sound you want. Often people use upright because they specifically want the instrument's percussive, thumpy attack and also it's a short decay. IMHO compression tends to reduce dynamic range and add sustain, so it may go against an individual's tone goals.
If the sound of your upright is uneven, I suggest using a utility EQ rather than compression. Something like an Empress ParaEQ should be helpful. In the past I have use fully parametric EQs and also 31 band graphics. The Empress appears to be a pretty decent compromise in a pedal format. With proper EQ the bass sounds more natural and the attack and decay characteristics are not modified with compression.
I am not fundamentally opposed to using compression on upright, but it is probably not something I would use on stage unless my goal was to make the instrument sound more like an EUB. If I did use compression, it would probably be very light. Unfortunately I would expect significant compression to lead to other problems related to the feedback loop between the amp and the bass. Why? A compressor increases gain between transients. This extra gain can cause feedback and also uneven frequency response if the bass is already on the edge. The more you need to amplify the bass, the more these things tend to be a problem.
Compression is something I do use as an audio tech to get the bass to lay just right in the house mix. But I don't think I have ever done this with upright.
But I think you take the pickup out of the equation. When you add a pickup to your upright the sound will be different than your acoustic sound anyway. I agree that it is the best to be able to control the dynamics with your hands but those dynamics won’t get lost when you use compression properly.