• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Contrabass sound post repair and evaluating overall condition/worth

This double bass of Czech origin has been in the family for several decades but seldom played. Originally found in the back of a music shop's storeroom missing a fingerboard and bridge in 1990. I paid $75 for it (the store owners were simply interested in clearing space) then $120 for a rather nice new fingerboard mounted by a local luthier. It was occasionally played at home over the years, but the sound post became dislodged at some point and was eventually lost. Later, a frightful attempt was made to tune it up without it once.

Photos attached, including an interior view and of the label; it reads "Copy of Antonius Stradivarius. Fecit anno 19[—?]. Made in Czechoslovakia." Damage from putting the strings under tension briefly without a post needs to be evaluated, along with any cracks visible, to help determine whether taking steps to repair it /reinstall a sound post is warranted. The goal is not and attempt to make it into a well-playing instrument, but just to get it back into somewhat playable condition. Very appreciative of all responses.
 

Attachments

  • 10847424_10152931677352232_4437756914457824275_o copy.jpg
    10847424_10152931677352232_4437756914457824275_o copy.jpg
    525.7 KB · Views: 41
  • 10869890_10152931677262232_6586119490144286476_o - Copy.jpg
    10869890_10152931677262232_6586119490144286476_o - Copy.jpg
    298.8 KB · Views: 38
  • bass interior lighter wide.jpg
    bass interior lighter wide.jpg
    374.4 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG-20231222-WA0002.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0002.jpg
    226.5 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG-20231222-WA0003.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0003.jpg
    187.1 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG-20231222-WA0005.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0005.jpg
    120.9 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0007.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0007.jpg
    152.7 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG-20231222-WA0008.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0008.jpg
    236.9 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0011.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0011.jpg
    158.6 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0010.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0010.jpg
    158.6 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0009.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0009.jpg
    113.6 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0012.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0012.jpg
    269.2 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0013.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0013.jpg
    163.7 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG-20231222-WA0014.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0014.jpg
    193.9 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0015.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0015.jpg
    139.2 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0016.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0016.jpg
    141.7 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0017.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0017.jpg
    161.5 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0020.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0020.jpg
    175.4 KB · Views: 40
  • IMG-20231222-WA0019.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0019.jpg
    233.1 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0018.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0018.jpg
    162.6 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0021.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0021.jpg
    154.6 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG-20231222-WA0022.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0022.jpg
    142.2 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0023.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0023.jpg
    170.3 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG-20231222-WA0024.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0024.jpg
    130.1 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0025.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0025.jpg
    191.8 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG-20231222-WA0029.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0029.jpg
    254.9 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG-20231222-WA0028.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0028.jpg
    193.6 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0027.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0027.jpg
    172.1 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG-20231222-WA0026.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0026.jpg
    131.2 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG-20231222-WA0030.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0030.jpg
    154 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0031.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0031.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG-20231222-WA0032.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0032.jpg
    159 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0036.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0036.jpg
    175.5 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0035.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0035.jpg
    108.5 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0034.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0034.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0033.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0033.jpg
    145.3 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG-20231222-WA0037.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0037.jpg
    179.6 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG-20231222-WA0038.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0038.jpg
    151.4 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0039.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0039.jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0043.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0043.jpg
    149.7 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG-20231222-WA0042.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0042.jpg
    165.6 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0041.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0041.jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0040.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0040.jpg
    173.7 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG-20231222-WA0044.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0044.jpg
    155.4 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0045.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0045.jpg
    159.4 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG-20231222-WA0046.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0046.jpg
    114.7 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0047.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0047.jpg
    163.1 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG-20231222-WA0048.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0048.jpg
    104.4 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG-20231222-WA0049.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0049.jpg
    131.5 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0052.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0052.jpg
    224.4 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG-20231222-WA0051.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0051.jpg
    153.6 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG-20231222-WA0050.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0050.jpg
    130.1 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG-20231222-WA0053.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0053.jpg
    209.7 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0054.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0054.jpg
    131.2 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG-20231222-WA0055.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0055.jpg
    205.4 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG-20231222-WA0056.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0056.jpg
    227.6 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20231222-WA0057.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0057.jpg
    196.2 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0058.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0058.jpg
    181.1 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG-20231222-WA0061.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0061.jpg
    272.7 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG-20231222-WA0060.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0060.jpg
    121.4 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG-20231222-WA0059.jpg
    IMG-20231222-WA0059.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 32
Looks like a typical Czech ply bass. My guess would be that it could date from anywhere from the 30’s to the 50’s and maybe even in a wider range. You’d need a real expert (not me) to have a look at it up close. The two tone colouring on the sides might be a clue. I doubt the Czech were exporting a lot of instruments to the US after ‘38 and before about ‘48. So 30’s or 50’s might seem more logical.

The real concern I’d have is that crack below the treble side bridge foot. The overall deformation doesn’t seem too concerning to me, but I’m not a pro. If that crack is really a crack and not just a surface scratch ( can’t really see ) you’d need to have a luthier look at it.

Al the rest seems solid enough and would not hold me back in just trying to set it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davino
Yeah - I expected it to look much worse than it does. I'm not really seeing a crack near the bridge position. If you tap near any of the apparent cracks, does it sound solid? Could you get a light/camera inside to see if they go through or are just superficial?

I've seen a lot worse looking basses being gigged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davino
Yeah - I expected it to look much worse than it does. I'm not really seeing a crack near the bridge position. If you tap near any of the apparent cracks, does it sound solid? Could you get a light/camera inside to see if they go through or are just superficial?

I've seen a lot worse looking basses being gigged.

Did you catch this one interior photo among the collection? I see what appear to be a number of thin cracks and various "cleats" (if that's the right term) over them, when examining closely. Tapping, it seems to have integrity, but without a sound post it resonates very differently, less solidly.

I see and feel the indentation where the bridge depressed the front better than any of the photos seem to show, though many angles and different lighting to capture it were attempted.
 

Attachments

  • bass interior lighter wide.jpg
    bass interior lighter wide.jpg
    374.4 KB · Views: 39
Looks like a typical Czech ply bass. My guess would be that it could date from anywhere from the 30’s to the 50’s and maybe even in a wider range. You’d need a real expert (not me) to have a look at it up close. The two tone colouring on the sides might be a clue. I doubt the Czech were exporting a lot of instruments to the US after ‘38 and before about ‘48. So 30’s or 50’s might seem more logical.

The real concern I’d have is that crack below the treble side bridge foot. The overall deformation doesn’t seem too concerning to me, but I’m not a pro. If that crack is really a crack and not just a surface scratch ( can’t really see ) you’d need to have a luthier look at it.

Al the rest seems solid enough and would no t hold me back in just trying to set it up.

The crack near the treble side bridge foot... well-spotted. Until we can get a camera with light onto that area, it's difficult to ascertain from the outside the extent/depth of that crack. Tapping on that area and applying some pressure form the outside, it doesn't immediately seem fatal, though a sound post that isn't wide/well contoured could be too much of a hard poke in that spot that a surface crack can't withstand.

The dark two-tone (tobacco-finish, in guitar talk) colouring is on the back and front as well, though more pronounced on the sides. I wonder, as a "Czech ply," if this is considered a very low-end, low-value instrument, an "ugly duckling," and whether pre-war or post-war makes much difference in value.

The fingerboard was initially presumed to be ebony, but in good light, lighter brown striations are visible, more like a mahogany than black ebony. Do these Czech ply basses have a spruce top or are they plywood throughout all the panels?

Not captured in the photos shared before is this one of the tuners with what looks like an insignia that was applied later. It's illegible to me.

Anyway, delighted to learn more about this.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2023-12-23 at 09.57.02_39800421.jpg
    WhatsApp Image 2023-12-23 at 09.57.02_39800421.jpg
    192.1 KB · Views: 37
The fingerboard was initially presumed to be ebony, but in good light, lighter brown striations are visible, more like a mahogany than black ebony. Do these Czech ply basses have a spruce top or are they plywood throughout all the panels?

$150 for a new fingerboard, wow (even for 1990 prices). I just did a new one on my Italian, and it cost me 10x as much.

Could still be ebony, even if it has brown striations in it. My understanding is that only the most top shelf ebony is black. Most ebony boards, even if very high quality, have some brown in them, and are usually dyed to make them evenly black.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AGCurry and Davino
It might be worth removing one of the tuner plates to see what's under it. #3 shows a lot of cleats, which would be odd in a plywood bass. I couldn't tell from any of the other pics if it's ply or not. It would be strange for a carved bass to have such an appalling finish job, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davino
It might be worth removing one of the tuner plates to see what's under it. #3 shows a lot of cleats, which would be odd in a plywood bass. I couldn't tell from any of the other pics if it's ply or not. It would be strange for a carved bass to have such an appalling finish job, though.

I removed one of the tuner plates but, alas, nothing at all underneath. It's not likely or possible that just one of the plates is stamped, is it? I can pull the other plate if there's a chance, but, otherwise, prefer not to twist around and finagle those very old string ends out, lest they break.

In the one good interior pic referred to, I see that the bass bar is clearly ply with its pressed layers, but elsewhere I'm not spotting such signs. Maybe others can direct on where to look.

The body finish is really dark, dull, and low contrast. An ugly duckling among contrabasses? Still, I'd be keen to identify a likely manufacture period, narrowing it further than 1930s–'50s. And get a sense of its approximate monetary worth. Is it worth pulling the other plate for any more clues?
20231223_224749.jpg
 
$150 for a new fingerboard, wow (even for 1990 prices). I just did a new one on my Italian, and it cost me 10x as much.

Could still be ebony, even if it has brown striations in it. My understanding is that only the most top shelf ebony is black. Most ebony boards, even if very high quality, have some brown in them, and are usually dyed to make them evenly black.

Yes, I somehow managed to bring together a playable bass for well under $300 back then. Minor miracle. Very interesting to learn, and not surprising really, that dyes were used to maintain that even black tone in fingerboards that is so common. The fingerboard piece is very thick, dense, heavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: walking_line
I've always been told that he never made any basses so I'm curious to know where you read this...

Well, of course, I looked it up on Google! Turns out Dragonetti supposedly had one, and there was another that has disappeared.
But I also read on the internet that Abraham Lincoln sez, “don’t believe everything you read on the internet!”

So, since I had always heard that he never made a bass, and so had you, then maybe Dragonetti was wrong about his bass. I really don’t know.
 
I've been told stories over the years that the teller claims are historically verified and are completely untrue. One of these is the Dragonetti-Strat tale. Every photo and other depiction of Mr. D shows a DaSalo. I remember one account that claimed he died when struck by a tailpiece that flew up when the wire broke: great story, totally false. I'm sure there are many others. Can anyone verify the dogs in the audience or under the stool story?