I’m not going to say that this is “better”, it’s just a unique arrangement, and I’m posting in tribute to Phil Chen….
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I didn't realize that that was a criteria for posting what one likes here. Sorry, not sorry.No, explain how it’s an improvement.
Who made that rule up?No, explain how it’s an improvement.
Original:
Cover:
Why better? It's about a minute longer, and Dave is THE #1 Chuck cover guy, imo.
Easy song to make good covers because Willie Dixon only wrote great songs.Foghat’s version was horrible, they just bludgeoned the song, the Stones gave it the hyper Bo Diddley treatment, it was OK for what it was, but how does that one improve on Muddy Waters’ original? His was all sex and atmosphere.
original
cover
I didn't realize that that was a criteria for posting what one likes here. Sorry, not sorry.

The title of the thread is “covers better than the original”; if you’re going to make a statement about a particular version, shouldn’t you qualify why? Otherwise, this thread is pointless.Who made that rule up?
I agree, it's good to be able to articulate why than to just say.. because I like it better.The title of the thread is “covers better than the original”; if you’re going to make a statement about a particular version, shouldn’t you qualify why? Otherwise, this thread is pointless.
Some of us appreciate a good argument.