I think you've missed my point
I understand the MBD's boost requires the MBD to be engaged. I was stating why a dirty or heavily colored boost would bring more to the table than an independent clean boost.If you read the full sentence I wrote, rather than the eleven-word excerpt you quote, I not only contrast a dirty or heavily colored boost with the MBD's boost, but also acknowledge this only works for stacking into the BPD (Boost→MBD→BPD). We are in agreement that this would not allow users to stack boost→BPD→MBD. Hence, my suggestion of an independent dirty boost built for this demo board.
I'm sorry it came across that way. I was aiming for firm clarity (hence the underlined "full") because it genuinely seemed to me that my words were taken out of context, but also made sure to point out that we are actually in agreement, attempted to de-escalate by writing "I think" instead of asserting "You've missed the point," and opened my reply with a smiley face to establish a positive tone. Clearly I was unsuccessful in conveying that tone and I apologize for that. I never want anyone to feel belittled or condescended and I'm so sorry my reply read that way. I can certainly understand how you "only quoted" what you feel was relevant, but I hope you can also understand how I feel that the material you omitted provides context central to the meaning of quote in question, meaning which is in fact antipodal to how the quote reads in isolation 
