• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dealing With A Would-Be BL

Gather round the forum, TB'ers, this one's fun! (And please, forgive the length of the yarn)

G is a guitar player (blues, fairly skilled) and singer (soul, nice voice) who has spent the last ten years working as a solo act in bars and small venues, player cover sets and making a little money for his trouble. We started this project because he wanted to actually play out the original stuff he's been writing and stashing over that time frame.

Our drummer is a very technically proficient guy with a quiet attitude. He's not the type to tell you off, but he is the type to shrug off anything he feels is unnecessary or unhelpful. In that respect he's both easy and difficult- if you speak the language, he'll do whatever you want. If you don't speak the language, you're not going to get anywhere. FWIW, I'm more or less in this category too. I'm a grown man and a grown bass player; I'm a team player but do need to be given some space to do my thing or I'm not going to be able to give my best work.

G wants to be a BL but has never been in a band. D and I are both pros in the respect that we don't need a heavy hand or a lot of direction - play the track, give us the feel you want and we'll knock it down. We're on time, we're rehearsed, we're level headed and open communicators in the room, all that good stuff. So far the experience and patience from D and I (we're both at or over the ten year marker) have made G's lack of experience as a BL a non-issue.

We have a list of songs we've been working on, and have had the limitation of being too jammy. We show up, warm up and then work on songs and the songs never seem to stick to an arrangement because G won't nail anything down. Last week D took the initiative and walked us through arrangements for two songs. I believe wholeheartedly that was a necessary step, and had refrained from doing so because I didn't want to have to deal with a potential headache (that's on me). We played them and liked how they sounded, I sent out an email with the arrangements written down so we could look it over and discuss/ lock it in, everything is good. The goal for practice this week is to record those arrangements so we can have something to work with.

Well.

Guys.

That didn't work out.

G went from being a talented performer and inexperienced BL to a complete diva. At the mere mention of recordings he started getting flustered and making excuses and just generally caving under pressure. This is after multiple mentions in email/ text/ phone calls that we want to get a low-key working recording for our own purposes. After a brief "disagreement" in which D and G talked right past each other about how to record ('I want to do A,' 'hey that's great, I love it, let's do B,' 'okay then, A it is,' 'Awesome, here goes B') our whole practice got shot to sh*t. I drove 3 hours through an ice storm for a two and a half hour practice in which we couldn't even nail down one good take, because G and D couldn't get theirs heads out of the G D buts long enough to get something to stick.

To make matters worse, as soon as things starting going in a direction G didn't like, he started to try and completely re-work the arrangement through incremental changes, and I have reason to believe he did it as a form of sabotage. Instead of taking the time to stop things, address what he wanted and make wholesale changes, he would stop the song, make one change, stop again, make another change and so on and so forth until nothing was the same as the original arrangement and I was obligated to write a new line on the fly. This was doubly frustrating because we have already spent weeks dialing this song in and after last practice the consensus was that is was done and ready to record. D and I both suggested, in light of how poorly things were going, that we should move on to another song and get our wind back. No dice. G kept bringing it back to the one song we couldn't agree on.

Things in the room got tense and unproductive, so I called practice (used some hand/wrist pain issues as an excuse). I don't like doing that, but my experience says that when you're over two hours of working time and still stuck in the same rut, it's time to call it a day. I called D after and talked it over and we're on the same page with regards to G - he's got the music side of things, but he needs to step up in his non-music skills if he wants this thing to work. All of the issues we had today came back to one of two things - inexperience in the band setting (working with others) and ego (not listening to others, not centering and getting down to work when things aren't perfect).

Here's the ask - how would you go about dealing with G? My plan as of right now is to call him up and talk with him about being in a band as opposed to being a solo act and to remind him that D and I are highly skilled volunteers who really don't need the hassle of a BL who doesn't know what he's doing. What I'm unsure of is whether it would better to try and coach him into being a better BL, or to convince him to step away from the admin side of that role and stick more to songwriting. Coaching him up is easier on his ego but requires more effort and patience on my part, convincing him to step back is a harder sell that (if successful) could lead to immediate resolution of the issue. I'm not about being in a 'drama' band (been there, done that), so I'm comfortable with resolving or quitting and stealing the drummer.
 
First, I would talk with the drummer and decide together the best way to proceed - alone of together. You need to present a united front.

When you talk with G, don't all down to him - you already see he is touchy. Let him you and D are together, and that you feel the best use of time is to give everyone homework to do on the songs, so that rehearsal time yields the most results. Either he will get it, and you can proceed as a band, or he is better off as a solo act.
 
IMHO, this is the opportunity to test G's character in regards to being reminded that this is still a team effort. We've all had that member who thinks that since no one argues with them when they practice alone, playing the way they like, then there's no way anyone should argue/dispute their part in a group setting. If G can't get pick up on the potential frustration, then an ultimatum might be the way to go. Its always easier to spell it out in a groups infancy, rather than wait till it gets out of hand and tensions form. Again, just my opinion. Best of luck!
 
It was said of legendary bluesman Lightning Hopkins that he simply could never constrain himself to a traditional 12-bar (or any...) form, much to the consternation of his sidemen.
Famous quote: "Lightnin' change when Lightnin' want to change..."
One takeaway is: You've heard of Lightning Hopkins. The sidemen, not so much.

G's not getting his way and is acting out in maybe the only way he knows how.
This _could_ be a teachable moment if you can get him to acknowledge that he did not achieve his desired result.
issues we had today came back to one of two things - inexperience in the band setting (working with others) and ego
Experience can be learned. "Experience comes from bad judgment." Ego is necessary, but pig-headedness is toxic.
G has probably never had to follow a fixed form or lead sheet. IMO, he'll need to learn this skill, which I consider essential for working well with others.

In my mind, there are multiple, separate roles, some of which can be performed by the same people.
1) Songwriter. (At some point, you must accept that the song is done and stop changing it, except to accommodate the arrangement).
2) Arranger - Decide song form -- 'A' sections, 'B' sections, Bridge... What instruments play what, when. When you have decided on an arrangement, this job is over.
3) Musical Director / Producer -- What the instruments should sound like, "feel" of the song.
4) Performers - interpret the song as it has been formed by 1-3.
5) The Business Side. Bookings and such. Until you have a product, this role is just generalized planning at best.

Until you can establish who is doing what and -- important point -- When That Task Is Done -- you don't have a foundation for performance recordings.
IMO, it's always desirable to record every rehearsal, even though I don't always do it.

To me, it sounds like your Songwriter wants to jump ahead to Producer but doesn't have the skills or the vocabulary.
Nor the maturity that comes of confidence that the song is DONE and stop changing it.
 
I'd get with the drummer and see where he's at. I don't like sidebar conversations, but when everything is going to pot, sometimes you have to get feelers out to see how everyone else is perceiving the situation. This will provide information about how it's going from the drummer's perspective.

With this information, I would take the next step, but am unsure what that is without knowing the drummer's attitudes. So, assuming he agrees with you, I would then speak to G.

I'd be open about the 3 hour drive in an ice-storm and the disappointing, ever-shifting structure of the song. I'd be open about the lack of progress.

I do this song writing too, by the way, and I have the song pretty much arranged by the time the musicians come over. I seek feedback from the musicians, and sometimes, we experiment with some broad-stroke changes, like which section we solo, or maybe a way of ending the song. Sometimes we experiment with the feel. Sometimes the song isn't very good after we play it, so I get feedback on what could change to make it better.

That's it. Practice ends at that point on that song. I go back to the drawing board with the feedback from the musicians. Next time, I have fixed the trouble spots, decided on the overall structure of the song. Then it's all about mastering the song so we can do it live. Occasionally the song ends up on the bone pile, but most of the time we move forward.

One thing that might help is having a goal to perform originals somewhere. This will create some urgency that filters out all the chaff in rehearsal. With only a short period of time to prepare, you tend to get more efficient. Even if you are playing for free.

You said you were thinking of coaching him, or removing him from admin. I don't see admin as the issue here. It's simply the song writing process. Admin would be booking gigs, arranging rehearsal, marketing the band, etcetera. He should be pretty good at this at some level since he's been solo for so long -- or am I missing something? The problem seems to be the songwriting process.
 
To speak to some of the issues raised:

- I had a quick sidebar with the drummer last night and we are, by and large, on the same page w/r/t G. I did my best to keep it from going into gossip territory, because once that infects a band, it tends to stay. I don't want to be in a band of shifting 2 v 1 alliances.
- We have a gig set for 5/17 and are looking for earlier options
- G has been working through an agent, so for the most part he's a "check the calendar, show up at location on time" working guy, not a "fill the calendar" guy
- feedback in the room was insufficient to try different stylistic directions, which amplified frustration with lack of progress (I see this as a communication issue)
- we failed to move on after things broke down because we couldn't refocus (I see this as an attitude/ leadership vacuum issue - no voice to draw everyone back in and redirect the energy)
 
Oh, man, does this sound familiar. You sure you weren't in my session this week? I got advice all night from a guy whose studio experience was mainly analog and has been telling me for two weeks that I need to saturate the signal on my digital workstation. If I hear how the drums need to "hit the red" one more time, I may scream. No matter how many times I tell him that's how they did it on tape but it will sound awful on a digital recording, he will keep saying it. But I digress.

My take: G *is* a perfectionist but he's also feeling insecure because he's in a situation where he doesn't really understand how to make it all work, and he feels as though he ought to know more than he does (sorta like my guy). At some point someone is going to have to take the helm and explain to him that there can only be one cook, and that the cook needs to come up with an actual plan, on paper, that everyone can rehearse and follow in the studio. If G thinks that should be him, he should step all the way up to that plate. He is the songwriter, after all, so some decisions naturally should fall to him, if he's up to the task. But it sounds like he needs the help you two can offer, but doesn't want to give up control.

I ended up telling my people that there were too many cooks, they were wasting my time when I was tired and could be sleeping, and that if someone else wanted to run the thing they needed to step up and do all of it because I was ready to step down. In my case, they decided they really didn't know how to do it, and that shut them up. You might have to give G a similar opportunity. Tell him to develop his arrangements, make them final, and then bring them in so the band can practice them for a week. Make notes. Record the following week. If he wants to make changes then, you're probably dealing with someone who can never be happy.
 
I'd try and open the conversation with some positives about the work you are doing, "both D & B are really into the songs we're doing, and we really see some potential for this thing growing and really want to be involved in the ride, but we have a few concerns".

I would play on the "team effort" angle, and that the song framework he brings needs objective input the D & B can bring to the table, so as to improve the whole song.

Being in a band is a team game after all, and although every team needs a Team Captain, the team captain needs to be able to rely on the other team members to pull their weight and bring their own talents to play in the team.

I'd also start recording rehearsal sessions, and share them with everyone. "I really like this arrangement" / "Not so keen on this arrangement" etc., invite comments, as the recordings will help focus things IME.
 
musicians, bands, projects......:laugh:

how would you go about dealing with G?
i would tell him everything that you've shared here. if you want things to work out with 'G' = you have to be forthright with G. there are two of you who have experiences that G doesn't have --- it's time for some schooling. also: he has some experiences that you don't have!

-or-

take the easy way out: steal the drummer and start something else!* (still doesn't mean you wouldn't be forthright with G!)


* no value judgment here: i would do either of my suggestions depending on my 'gut' + "what is best for me: right now, down the road, etc?" it's always a bit of a gamble...because it's important to you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Moo and nixdad
I've exeprienced something very similar in the not too distant past - singer/guitarist moving from solo to fronting a band. Fairly talented player/singer, but this situation didn't end well, either.

When stuff like this happens, I'm well past the "money-music-hang" thinking and into the "musicianship-bandsmanship-showmanship" line of thinking.

Someone can be a great musician, but if they can't function as a bandmate, then it's not worth it to me.

If they can function as a musician and bandmate, but can't put on a show, then again, it's not worth it to me.

Sounds like your G/BL is having trouble with the bandsmanship part of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Moo
My plan as of right now is to call him up and talk with him about being in a band as opposed to being a solo act and to remind him that D and I are highly skilled volunteers who really don't need the hassle of a BL who doesn't know what he's doing.
I'd leave off the part about not knowing what he's doing.

I'd just say something along the lines of, "I know you're used to being in a solo act, but now you're in a band and how I approach a band situation is that either I get an equal say in how it's run, or I get $100 (or whatever number) per service to include rehearsals and gigs." I'd be ready to walk because it doesn't sound like this situation is fixable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HolmeBass
I agree that the drummer and yourself should bring the issue up at the next band practice.
I would not say you guys are more pro then him or whatever.

I would just mention you were on board with the project up till this point, and you are starting to get the feeling this isn't going to workout if things aren't address.

And then rattle off the issues that are making you feel like you guys need to walk away. If he pulls a fit say nothing just pack up and leave, because at that point you know exactly what the future holds. Good Luck
 
Oh, man, does this sound familiar. You sure you weren't in my session this week? I got advice all night from a guy whose studio experience was mainly analog and has been telling me for two weeks that I need to saturate the signal on my digital workstation. If I hear how the drums need to "hit the red" one more time, I may scream. No matter how many times I tell him that's how they did it on tape but it will sound awful on a digital recording, he will keep saying it. But I digress.

My take: G *is* a perfectionist but he's also feeling insecure because he's in a situation where he doesn't really understand how to make it all work, and he feels as though he ought to know more than he does (sorta like my guy). At some point someone is going to have to take the helm and explain to him that there can only be one cook, and that the cook needs to come up with an actual plan, on paper, that everyone can rehearse and follow in the studio. If G thinks that should be him, he should step all the way up to that plate. He is the songwriter, after all, so some decisions naturally should fall to him, if he's up to the task. But it sounds like he needs the help you two can offer, but doesn't want to give up control.

I ended up telling my people that there were too many cooks, they were wasting my time when I was tired and could be sleeping, and that if someone else wanted to run the thing they needed to step up and do all of it because I was ready to step down. In my case, they decided they really didn't know how to do it, and that shut them up. You might have to give G a similar opportunity. Tell him to develop his arrangements, make them final, and then bring them in so the band can practice them for a week. Make notes. Record the following week. If he wants to make changes then, you're probably dealing with someone who can never be happy.
I think you're on to something here. G seems like a painter, not an artist. The difference? An artist know when to stop putting on more paint! Time to hold him to one arrangement, rehearse t and move on. IMHO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Moo and LBS-bass
Step 1:

Make sure you have all the contact info for the drummer.

Step 2:

Get ALL your stuff out of the practice space. Do NOT overlook this step. I was in a band where our guitarist, after discussing it with the rest of the band, fired the drummer - all of our gear was in the drummer's girlfriend's basement. OOPS!

Step 2:

Begin auditions/auditioning for your next band.
 
It's for different reasons, but I'm at this very impasse (need a change or I'm done) with my originals project and need to have an uncomfortable talk with my BL.

Tough spot that you're probably not going to fix. G has the right to see that his songs get the arrangement he wants, but you guys also have the right to lock down a version. I have similar issues, though not as dramatic in my original project.

I think the best you can do is talk to G, explain his methods are frustrating and you may not be able to stick around for much more of it. I wouldn't make it a "we" (you and D) statement, but you could indicate that you think D feels the same. I don't like the mutiny approach (2 vs 1 in this case) to issue resolution.

To drive your point home, you could do one of two things: Threaten (and intend) to walk if it doesn't improve or as @lfmn16 suggests, demand payment for your time. If you're not a band member with the ability to have your views considered, you're just a hired gun. Then he can waste as much of your time as he's willing to pay you for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lfmn16
Open - honest communication might work
Do make sure he understand that you do want to be ion a band with him.

If that does not work:
Bail.jpg
 

Latest posts