Originally Posted by dmusic148
No, BAD call. You should have accepted- they liked your sound and then figured out your gear was good after all. You were all set. Turned them down anyway? Why? Spite?
BZZZT!!!
Thanks for playing, but wrong answer.
The fact is these toads are more concerned with image than anything else. You should never crack on a musician's gear until you hear them play through it.
If you're hiring for a Beatles tribute band, then yes, pointing out the inappropriateness of the Jerzy Drozd Excellence VII for the gig at the outset of the audition is reasonable. But, if you're just another in a sea of classic rock/country/blues cover acts (and I'm in one myself, so I'm not putting anyone down), don't question the gear until you've heard it and it is shown that a) it doesn't get the sound, and b) the player can't adjust it to get the correct sound for the gig.
If there is one thing that will have me leaving an audition before plugging in is some pig-headed idiot telling me my gear isn't good enough because it isn't Brand ABC or Brand XYZ.
I say the OP is more patient than I because the first putz that said something while I was setting up would have gotten a "what's that $4!7 on your face" look, then I would have just turned around and packed up.
I'm a professional, I make that clear (politely, and confidently, not arrogantly

) when I first speak to anyone about an audition, I have first class gear, I'm reliable, and I can nail the gig - period. I have to back that up, but they have to actually HEAR me to know I can. Seeing me, unless it is for the aforementioned EXCEPTIONALLY SPECIFIC REASON, is no way to judge what I am or am not capable of.