Difference 32" to 34" scale?

[nippes]

...okay, the length, I know. But there has to be something more.
I´ve read in a lot of threads about people ordering custom 32" scale basses. What´s the deal about the shorter scale? I could imagine a better/easier playability, but what about the sound?

Thanks, Nippes

 

[Akami]

The general difference is less punch and a bit rounder tone in general for shorter scale instruments.

 

[bongomania]

IMO the open strings can sound less tight or punchy, but the fretted/fingered notes sound just as tight as 34". Plus, since a large percentage of tone is in the hands rather than the gear, better/easier playability CAN result in better tone (depends on the player).

 

[Gegatso]

Being an owner of a few 34's, a 35", and a 31", I have to honestly say that excluding the sub $200 basses out there - a short scale can do everything the standard scale basses can do, and then some. Definitely easier to play...you almost just have to *think* the notes for them to happen. It's sweet to warm-up on a 34" and then play a 32" or 31" for the show. It is like baseball warmups with weights on the bat.
Everyone has their own opinion, though, and that's how it should be. I personally like the spacing of the strings. Those of you who can palm a basketball will find it too small. The bass has to be made well, but like Bongomania said - a lot depends on your hands, and that's the truth.

Mark

 

[WarriorJoe7]

Well to give you an idea... Play an A on the E string... That is what an A sounds like on a 25.5 inch scale.

Now play an open A... that is an A on a 34 inch scale... a little brighter and clearer, more defined.

If you believe that the nut plays a part in this then move up one note on both strings to a Bb.

Or a better idea... Read my thread on temporarily converting a regular scale bass to a medium or short scale bass. All you need is a capo... http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=262618