Not to mention it just looks freakin awesome as well!drool I love the ducati white D bird. It really stands out, especially the outline of the headstock.I love how thick and mean the D-Bird sounds. Nice clip.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Not to mention it just looks freakin awesome as well!drool I love the ducati white D bird. It really stands out, especially the outline of the headstock.I love how thick and mean the D-Bird sounds. Nice clip.
I first read this as “...No, that’s the Lightning.” Which somehow made perfect sense.Haha! No, that's the lighting![]()
Cool idea Nate.Hey Dingwallers!
Thanks for the feedback the last couple of days on the fretless query!
As some of you know I’ve got a fretless build underway and have been trying to figure out what best suits my needs and gain info from others experience and other perspectives.
I originally started this thinking I wanted an unlined but then after experiencing an unlined parallel fretless( as previously mentioned) I found it awkward but that was because my fingers wanted to assume the “fan”.
If I was to play a parallel fretless moving forward I would want lines and having never played a dinger fretless I honestly don’t know how that would translate.
I came up with a hybrid type design that would work for my needs as I can see a lot of the fretboard as mentioned in the last couple days. I don’t recall if I had posted it here but since it got rejected by Dingwall I might as well show you guys now.
View attachment 3162764
This a photo of the revised layout which was an attempt to simplify it further.
Basically it’s a set of critical dotted lines so to speak.
Sheldon stated on the Dingwall forum(pre update) that they were going to move AWAY from full lines due to possible issues that can arise with the lines. The good news I guess is that lines are still an offering as an alternative to a blank slate.
Anyways, I’d love to go blank but I feel I’ll be WAY more comfortable with at least some position indication so I guess I’ll be going with the lines.
One last question on this topic for you guys? How important would it be to you guys to have the side dots ON fretline vs standard fretted positioning. I know where I stand on this as well but I am curious to hear the common consensus.
Thanks again fellas
The small line in the middle of the fretboard looks like a workable idea. More useful than the line on the lower side of the neck which is (on the bass I showed a couple of pages back) obscured by the G string while playing.
View attachment 3162774
Me, too!I first read this as “...No, that’s the Lightning.” Which somehow made perfect sense.
DBird + FUZZ = drooldrooldrool
Was your bass shipped from Dingwall after Dec 31st, 2017? If not, you needed the 3x kit so as to avoid this very issue.Has anybody here installed the 3x pickup upgrade for the Combustion?
I purchased the single pickup kit today and followed the instructions in which I took the current bridge pickup in my Combustion and moved it to the middle route and then installed the new pickup as the bridge. The issue I am having is that the bridge sounds fine, the middle sounds fine but bridge/middle parallel sounds so out of phase it isn't funny. The instructions state to swap the bridge to the middle as I did to avoid issues however I seem to be getting them anyway.
I have checked and re-checked the instructions and the wiring and cannot figure out what the issue is. Has anybody successfully upgrade a Combustion (not NG2) to the 3 pickup version?
Thanks in advance![]()
Was your bass shipped from Dingwall after Dec 31st, 2017? If not, you needed the 3x kit so as to avoid this very issue.
Well, yes, obviously. It's lightning fast.I first read this as “...No, that’s the Lightning.” Which somehow made perfect sense.
Hey Dingwallers!
Thanks for the feedback the last couple of days on the fretless query!
As some of you know I’ve got a fretless build underway and have been trying to figure out what best suits my needs and gain info from others experience and other perspectives.
I originally started this thinking I wanted an unlined but then after experiencing an unlined parallel fretless( as previously mentioned) I found it awkward but that was because my fingers wanted to assume the “fan”.
If I was to play a parallel fretless moving forward I would want lines and having never played a dinger fretless I honestly don’t know how that would translate.
I came up with a hybrid type design that would work for my needs as I can see a lot of the fretboard as mentioned in the last couple days. I don’t recall if I had posted it here but since it got rejected by Dingwall I might as well show you guys now.
View attachment 3162764
This a photo of the revised layout which was an attempt to simplify it further.
Basically it’s a set of critical dotted lines so to speak.
Sheldon stated on the Dingwall forum(pre update) that they were going to move AWAY from full lines due to possible issues that can arise with the lines. The good news I guess is that lines are still an offering as an alternative to a blank slate.
Anyways, I’d love to go blank but I feel I’ll be WAY more comfortable with at least some position indication so I guess I’ll be going with the lines.
One last question on this topic for you guys? How important would it be to you guys to have the side dots ON fretline vs standard fretted positioning. I know where I stand on this as well but I am curious to hear the common consensus.
Thanks again fellas
I don't know. This info was sent to us as a dealer and I would assume all dealers received it. See if your dealer will take it back and get you the full 3x kit.Ahh poopie, no it was shipped mid 2017. The guys in the shop didn’t know which kit I needed and just assumed it was the single.
Oh bugger.
Do you know where I can find this info? I looked all over the Dingwall site but couldn’t find anything.
Ahh poopie, no it was shipped mid 2017. The guys in the shop didn’t know which kit I needed and just assumed it was the single.
Oh bugger.
Do you know where I can find this info? I looked all over the Dingwall site but couldn’t find anything.
I like the mini-lines. I find they're most useful in the upper register starting from the 12th fret.The small line in the middle of the fretboard looks like a workable idea. More useful than the line on the lower side of the neck which is (on the bass I showed a couple of pages back) obscured by the G string while playing.
View attachment 3162774
There are two important things to know when messing with pickups, and they both have to be correct or bad things happen.This is from a ways back so it may or may not be super current/accurate.
View attachment 3163044
Ahh poopie, no it was shipped mid 2017. The guys in the shop didn’t know which kit I needed and just assumed it was the single.
Oh bugger.
Do you know where I can find this info? I looked all over the Dingwall site but couldn’t find anything.
Has anybody here installed the 3x pickup upgrade for the Combustion?
I purchased the single pickup kit today and followed the instructions in which I took the current bridge pickup in my Combustion and moved it to the middle route and then installed the new pickup as the bridge. The issue I am having is that the bridge sounds fine, the middle sounds fine but bridge/middle parallel sounds so out of phase it isn't funny. The instructions state to swap the bridge to the middle as I did to avoid issues however I seem to be getting them anyway.
I have checked and re-checked the instructions and the wiring and cannot figure out what the issue is. Has anybody successfully upgrade a Combustion (not NG2) to the 3 pickup version?
Thanks in advance![]()
Hey Dingwallers!
Thanks for the feedback the last couple of days on the fretless query!
As some of you know I’ve got a fretless build underway and have been trying to figure out what best suits my needs and gain info from others experience and other perspectives.
I originally started this thinking I wanted an unlined but then after experiencing an unlined parallel fretless( as previously mentioned) I found it awkward but that was because my fingers wanted to assume the “fan”.
If I was to play a parallel fretless moving forward I would want lines and having never played a dinger fretless I honestly don’t know how that would translate.
I came up with a hybrid type design that would work for my needs as I can see a lot of the fretboard as mentioned in the last couple days. I don’t recall if I had posted it here but since it got rejected by Dingwall I might as well show you guys now.
View attachment 3162764
This a photo of the revised layout which was an attempt to simplify it further.
Basically it’s a set of critical dotted lines so to speak.
Sheldon stated on the Dingwall forum(pre update) that they were going to move AWAY from full lines due to possible issues that can arise with the lines. The good news I guess is that lines are still an offering as an alternative to a blank slate.
Anyways, I’d love to go blank but I feel I’ll be WAY more comfortable with at least some position indication so I guess I’ll be going with the lines.
One last question on this topic for you guys? How important would it be to you guys to have the side dots ON fretline vs standard fretted positioning. I know where I stand on this as well but I am curious to hear the common consensus.
Thanks again fellas
Get an unmarked board from Dingwall and have another tech do these markings?Hey Dingwallers!
Thanks for the feedback the last couple of days on the fretless query!
As some of you know I’ve got a fretless build underway and have been trying to figure out what best suits my needs and gain info from others experience and other perspectives.
I originally started this thinking I wanted an unlined but then after experiencing an unlined parallel fretless( as previously mentioned) I found it awkward but that was because my fingers wanted to assume the “fan”.
If I was to play a parallel fretless moving forward I would want lines and having never played a dinger fretless I honestly don’t know how that would translate.
I came up with a hybrid type design that would work for my needs as I can see a lot of the fretboard as mentioned in the last couple days. I don’t recall if I had posted it here but since it got rejected by Dingwall I might as well show you guys now.
View attachment 3162764
This a photo of the revised layout which was an attempt to simplify it further.
Basically it’s a set of critical dotted lines so to speak.
Sheldon stated on the Dingwall forum(pre update) that they were going to move AWAY from full lines due to possible issues that can arise with the lines. The good news I guess is that lines are still an offering as an alternative to a blank slate.
Anyways, I’d love to go blank but I feel I’ll be WAY more comfortable with at least some position indication so I guess I’ll be going with the lines.
One last question on this topic for you guys? How important would it be to you guys to have the side dots ON fretline vs standard fretted positioning. I know where I stand on this as well but I am curious to hear the common consensus.
Thanks again fellas
I really dig this design! I would even get it on a fretted Dingwall. Definitely like the triangles at the edge of the fretboard. Super unique, stylish, and very functional!
I like having the side dots ON the fretline when it comes to fretless. Having a fretless with side dots in the normal fretted bass position would be confusing for me.