BurningSkies
CRAZY BALDHEAD
- Feb 20, 2005
- 27,956
- 20,348
- Disclosures
- Endorsing artist: Dingwall Guitars
I prefer the active tone on my NG-2 to the passive. There is a noticeable difference to my ear. I'll admit that I'm an 'active guy'. I prefer a brighter tonal palette than most and always run with the preamp on. I run my Glock two-band preamps flat, but I actually use the DGTC for tone shaping, especially to cut bass, which opens up the tone very nicely. I find all three eq points useful.![]()
The TC brings stuff to the table. Of all the preamps I have, it is the one most recognizable. After having recorded maybe 150 or so shows, it specifically adds a texture to the output...some kind of very slight edge that the rest of the Dingwall preamps don't have. It really is a big part of the character of the NGs. Lacking the series bridge/neck on the NG3 with the 3X switch, I push the lows a bit to make up for that lack of emphasis in the deeper lows. And I do jockey the Low-mid/High-mid for different amounts of clarity or texture in that 'string-sound/treble range. I actually decided pretty quickly it would be beneficial to my fretless too. The OBP's are a little more polite, but they're warmer and feel a bit more compressed.
I'm one who actually does like active preamps, but I'm happy to have a passive Super-P...it just feels right, though I would guess it does have some down-sides were I on stage regularly again.
