• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

DIY "Jazz Bass" Headless Conversion

1) The Overlord string retainer requires the string to bend 90-degrees to meet the screw that it's holding it.
And it requires to go on the "cut-side" of the head. I prefer the Guyker approach.

2) The overlord was very cheap (40 Euros) and I could not resist - in the end I spent close to 60, but we know how these things work ;)

3) It's made of metal.
Thanks much. I ordered the Guyker kit because it was about the same price as the Overlord. I decided to get the OVSAL string retainer. It looks better for my application than most of the others. Everything should be here tomorrow.

Here’s the link to the Guyker Headless Kit and the OVSALstring retainer.

 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
Nobody has to bring anything - all the places I play have Hercules hanging stands. Hanging stands are more stable than regular stands - you can bump into the headstock on a hanging stand, and it won’t topple over. They have become the standard stand used everywhere in my world.
Fair enough. I've never had stands provided as general backline for gigs in my world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: /\/\3phist0
Thanks for the link @Pep looks to be nice kit!
Saved into my wish list. Thanks for sharing.

I got this one, all I need at the headstock end is a claw to hold the ball end behind the nut
Which is exactly what the Hondo Alien neck that I will be using has.
So that forced me to find a bridge that included a clamping mechanism, and as a bonus, the tuners are on the top edge: so no body routing necessary.
Assembled will be either a dimensionally reduced Explorer or Thunderbird body.
1746723929817.png


D36B2A49-EF4E-4D48-B933-AE40D889118B2024-09-09_11-12-31_226.jpeg
68D930AA-F155-4A25-B9E1-FFC8371B278A2024-09-09_11-32-38_538.jpeg
EA5213B6-5935-43F6-9AB7-AEAE2CA85BA52024-09-09_11-33-06_016.jpeg
93C95254-54BA-4AC9-BC8A-A19264005B532024-09-09_18-31-45_387.jpeg
797519C6-DDB5-4EA4-86F1-A08F74B4FEA62024-09-09_18-31-56_954.jpeg
IMG_3560.jpeg
 
This seems like a good place to post this.

I just finished "de-heading" a 12year old $100 Chinese eBay fretless. I figured I wouldn't loose much if it didn't turn out!

I replaced the pickups with Bartos years ago, as the stockers were pretty anemic. The strings (TI Jazz Flats) are worth more than the bass, but I wasn't using them. It was a fun project.

The "head" may look funny... I had to set the string length above the nut so the tuners only wrap silk... flats are funny that way. I filled the tuner holes with acrylic resin so old that it turned reddish brown when it cured! The shape of the head is a homage to my dear Uncle who passed away last year... he collected Packards.

The bass looks funky, but it plays great! No more neck dive, great J-bass tone, nice mwah.

IMG_6070.jpg
IMG_6071.jpg
IMG_6073.JPG
IMG_6074.JPG
 
This seems like a good place to post this.

I just finished "de-heading" a 12year old $100 Chinese eBay fretless. I figured I wouldn't loose much if it didn't turn out!

I replaced the pickups with Bartos years ago, as the stockers were pretty anemic. The strings (TI Jazz Flats) are worth more than the bass, but I wasn't using them. It was a fun project.

The "head" may look funny... I had to set the string length above the nut so the tuners only wrap silk... flats are funny that way. I filled the tuner holes with acrylic resin so old that it turned reddish brown when it cured! The shape of the head is a homage to my dear Uncle who passed away last year... he collected Packards.

The bass looks funky, but it plays great! No more neck dive, great J-bass tone, nice mwah.

View attachment 7259714View attachment 7259715View attachment 7259716View attachment 7259717
Looks really cool :cool:

I see you went for the "rollers" at the bridge.
Would like to know your opinion on this type of bridges...

Is it doable to tune it with your "bare hands"?
Or do you always need to use the key 'hidden' in the bridge?

Any special care needed when installing strings?

Where did you source the 5 single string retainers?
I think they would also work without ball ends, wouldn't they?

Lots of questions, I know, I am a curious person :)
Ciao, Domenico
 
Looks really cool :cool:

I see you went for the "rollers" at the bridge.
Would like to know your opinion on this type of bridges...

Is it doable to tune it with your "bare hands"?
Or do you always need to use the key 'hidden' in the bridge?
I wish they were higher ratio, or had taller knobs. I took the tuners apart, degreased them, and used some PFTE oil (for locks and clocks)... that seemed to smooth them out a little, but they are still too stiff at concert pitch for easy bare-finger adjustment. The little crank key works pretty well. The magnet storage is pretty clever, but I still worry about loosing it. This thing is also quite useful... H5mm for the tuners.
Note that I also had to use a little blue locktite on the tiny screw that holds the knob onto each tuner stem, otherwise the knob would work itself loose.
Any special care needed when installing strings?

Where did you source the 5 single string retainers?
I think they would also work without ball ends, wouldn't they?
Retainers came with the bridge. I did a little light machining to create an indentation for the ball ends, so they would fit flush and line up. They are brass, so you could do this with a rat-tail file if you wanted.

I'm sure you've noticed that the price on these bridges fluctuates widely... I recommend cross checking aliexpress, amazon, & eBay for the best deal.

I was careful to position the retainers so the tuners would only wrap the silk portion. TI & LaBella are both pretty clear that flat wounds should NOT wrap anything but the silk portion of the string on the tuners, or the strings will break. I believe them... don't ask me why :)

The retainers should work with cut strings, but I really wanted to avoid that... I made a separate post on cutting flat wounds for headless.
Lots of questions, I know, I am a curious person :)
Ciao, Domenico
No worries. I love Talkbass!
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
Done a couple of these recently using Nova style knock-offs available from Temu or AliExpress. Advantage with these is no routing required like the Overlord, although the pegs protrude from the base. I done several guitars using the 'roller' type bridge. They are quite stiff and hard to turn without the allan key handle. I decided to avoid for the bass as the strings are much thicker. I doubt they would wind on the rollers if the strings were cut shorter than the thin silk-wound section.

The action of these 'Novas' is smooth as they use proper thrust bearings. They are robustly made & can also be mounted direct onto the body if string height is an issue.
2025-07-22_083447.jpg

2025-07-22_081547.jpg


The Chicago neck was wider than the Mikro, so I had to cut the string retainer (solid brass, btw) in half to spread the strings out. I prefer the wider neck, but the pups are awful vs the Mikro. Ordered some replacements then realised they come in different sizes :rolleyes:

Cheers

Vic
 
Last edited: