In most cases, I doubt it. Many of those establishments were fine with having actual smoking sections prior to the legal ban. Someone who worked at a casual dining restaurant up north of here told me that they added e-cigs to their establishment's ban because some non-smokers, even those seated on the opposite side of the very large, air-circulated dining room where they couldn't possibly "nose" anything, were complaining about having to see someone doing something that even looked like smoking. They would try to explain to patrons that it wasn't the same thing, but it was like trying to talk to a wall. So management finally caved in because they got tired of hearing people complain.
If our noses are going to become so finicky that an occasional, fleeting whiff of something that smells like mint or cherry or whatever from someobdy's e-cig is that intolerable...then should I complain to management about that lady in the next booth who smells like she went swimming in a pool of Patchouli oil or the guy who walked in wearing work clothes that smell like automotive fluids?
I shouldn't have gone off on a rant in a mostly comical thread (I was in a mood earlier), but I'll end my participation in the thread by noting that the question does bear asking...where does the sense of entitlement that we must not be ever subjected to anything in public places that isn't exactly what we choose end?