- Dec 21, 2007
- 15,236
- 45,143
- Disclosures
- Lark in the Morning Instructional Videos; Audix Microphones
My Zon fretless is pretty much all I ever play or need.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting. I know nothing of Hammersmith---gotta look those up.I can't do it. I can go without buying any more, but while my Hammersmith PJ with Geezers and double stop Hipshot would be my choice (7 3/8 lbs of solid ass P goodness), I gotta have a little variety, too.
But here's a gratuitous pic of the Hammy just because that's what you do in these threads
View attachment 4257925
Impressive. How many hours of play do you have on it? Gigs? Rehearsals? Personal practice time? Using other Basses?
Where are the pics? I'm sure you've posted them somewhere!When I got the 53 P two decades ago, it went into immediate rotation with a 1962 P anywhere from 1-4 gigs a week. So I've played somewhere on the order of 1000 gigs on each bass since I got them about a year apart from each other.
The 53 spent over a decade (perhaps 3 or 4 decades) with the bassist for a major label band, on the road and in the studio. Only the body (stripped and refinned natural) and neck are original. The hardware and electronics were replaced due to wear/failure (refret, tuners, jack, pots) or performance mods (adding more pickups and changing to a 4 saddle bridge).
The 62 is also a natural refin, the pickup had to be rewound a few years ago and it probably has been refretted at some point. Otherwise, it seems to be original and at one point belonged to a school band. So how much play timne it had before I got it is unknown.
I'm sure some owners would have retired them long ago instead of keeping them going. I have/had other basses, all of which were primary gig basses at some point over the last 40 years as musical requirements changed, but those two Ps have seen more use than any of the others.
Company out of Toronto, making basses from 2016 to 2018, I believe. Mine was one of their first test basses. Turned out pretty darn sweet if you ask me. Did need a little work when I got it, but it's a very nice no-frills PJ that's super light.Interesting. I know nothing of Hammersmith---gotta look those up.
Surely a P but none of the Ps I own. None of them has THAT particular sound that makes me say "I can't live without it". It's still out there in the wild.
When I got the 53 P two decades ago, it went into immediate rotation with a 1962 P anywhere from 1-4 gigs a week. So I've played somewhere on the order of 1000 gigs on each bass since I got them about a year apart from each other.
The 53 spent over a decade (perhaps 3 or 4 decades) with the bassist for a major label band, on the road and in the studio. Only the body (stripped and refinned natural) and neck are original. The hardware and electronics were replaced due to wear/failure (refret, tuners, jack, pots) or performance mods (adding more pickups and changing to a 4 saddle bridge).
The 62 is also a natural refin, the pickup had to be rewound a few years ago and it probably has been refretted at some point. Otherwise, it seems to be original and at one point belonged to a school band. So how much play timne it had before I got it is unknown.
I'm sure some owners would have retired them long ago instead of keeping them going. I have/had other basses, all of which were primary gig basses at some point over the last 40 years as musical requirements changed, but those two Ps have seen more use than any of the others.