• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do you have to have a 5?

I just bought a Fender American Standard Jazz Bass 5. It's a great bass and sounds incredible...but I do not like playing 5 strings and I absolutely hate playing heavy basses (to me heavy is anything over 9.5 pounds), and this bass weighs in at 10. So why did I just spend over a grand on a bass I don't enjoy playing? because I needed one for the band I'm in. Many of the songs we play require the extended range of the 5. Plus, it really helps with my hand position to be able to play a little higher up the neck making use of the B string. I'm keeping it for now, but like most of the 5 strings I've owned over the years, it probably will see the classifieds at some point.
I bought a Kiesel 6 string headless… I needed to make some ergonomic adjustments but once I did, it feels lighter than any 4 I ever played…. You might want to consider a headless. Ibanez makes some nice ones in the $1000 range.
 
I'm yet to find one.

And often plays a 12.
I guess my attempt at dry humor was a bit too subtle ... lol.
I am a retired musician who played a LOT of musical theater up and down the East coast and a fiver was required for those gigs (with the exception of older musicals that used only upright bass). I play both 4 and 5 string basses and I love em both. So, I was just trying to add a little humor to your already fun post.
 
If you're playing a lot of modern or funk music in keys of B through Eb, sure, a fiver would be an asset.

Otherwise, it's another string to mute, and if you're an anchored-thumb 4-string guy, you'll probably want to switch to a floating-thumb technique.

Right-hand technique/habit is indeed a thing. I'm extremely left-handed and to deal with clumsiness I adopted floating thumb on 4, before transitioning to 5. It certainly helps!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pocket Dave
I bought a Kiesel 6 string headless… I needed to make some ergonomic adjustments but once I did, it feels lighter than any 4 I ever played…. You might want to consider a headless. Ibanez makes some nice ones in the $1000 range.

I’ve owned a few headless 4 string basses including 2 original Steinberger L series, and I really do like playing them, but I find most out of my price range. Even the new Kiesel’s are crazy expensive. A few of the basses I regret parting with were Carvin B50 5 strings. I had one that was just over 8 pounds, gorgeous, and I should never have parted with it. I think I did because I bought something else and I wasn’t in a situation where I needed a 5, but man I wish I had that one back. I’m sorry to see that Carvin, when it became Kiesel, went from a company that made quality affordable American basses to a wannabe boutique manufacturer that ceased making some of my favorite models. Just as well I suppose, a Kiesel B50 would probably cost almost twice as much as it did when it had Carvin on the headstock.
 
A five string bass is a completely different instrument than a four. If you don't want to get out from your comfort zone, disregard a fiver. If you want to start thinking in a different way instead, having a new visual and physical approach to the fingerboard, then a fiver would be a boost, for you. One thing "to me" seems clear, anyway: the five string bass currently is the new standard. Since quite a large slice of time. But you can definitely earn your daily bread with a four, I guess. Btw: learn to use/play a fiver, anyway. And have a decent one at home; a Squier or similar, well setup. Practice with it, learn the tricks. Maybe bring it to the next audition, too. You never know what a bandleader might want from the bassplayer... :)

For the most part I like your reply a lot. I think I would find nuance in the statement "a five string is a completely different instrument" and would argue that point. It's not that it's so much a totally different instrument is that initially it can create sensory confusion. And I think I know why, having gone through the "conversion" myself.

A lot of us start out as guitar players. We start with "cowboy chords", then progress to "bar chords" (why some folks spell that as barrre illudes me"). But we begin by relating the roots of the chords to the 6th and sometimes 5th strings on a guitar. So we orient 6-1 rather than 1-6. So when we cross over to 4 string bass we're mentally playing a guitar 8basso, missing strings 1 and 2. No problemo. But when we add that low B- it messes with our heads. For whatever reason we can't, initially just ignore that low B strings (as I tried to do the first time I played a 5er). And the spacing gets spread a bit, so it's easy for our hands to get confused. I don't understand that part of it as I can easily move from a 5er with a 43mm nut to one with a 48mm nut.

A friend of mine told me something that I initially scoffed at. He said, when going to a 5, put your 4 under the bed for 6 months. He was mostly right. It took me about 6 months to become comfortable on a 5 and a year to feel natural with it in my hands. But the diligence of adapting to a 5 was worth it... and necessary in my case.

I guess my question is; What's the point of a 4 if you can play a 5 well? And yeah.. in modern times 5 has become the defacto standard- in spite of 90% of basses hanging on guitar store walls is still 4 string. I wonder how things might change were the ratio reversed? I guess my guitar crossover analogy proves itself (in a different way) at guitar stores :).
 
Ok, so here's the real answer without any agenda pushing (like it validates anyone to convince others to do what they do :) )

If you are a studio player or someone who freelances on a variety of different styles, you should probably get a 5. May not need it often, but you will probably need it at some point.

If not, play whatever you want.
Sure. But one could also say "better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it"? I wish someone had told me that in a short time, a 5 (for me) would be a requirement before I over-improved my Squier Jazz 4!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avezzano

Clickbait title for a video that actually endorses the use of a five-string as long as the player is prepared to put in the work (which really goes without saying). The message I got: Want to stay in your comfort zone and not deal with the challenges of playing a 5-string? Stick with the 4-string. Like a challenge and wish to enhance your musical experience? Play a 5-string.