TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
As somebody who sells his music, I notice people just don't pay for music anymore. Charts that display music sales by each year also prove that people are buying music less and less.
I always prefer CD liners that have the song's lyrics printed on them.
or on Pandora where they do a constant push of similar artists to the one you selected.
Pandora more than any other current forum has led me to purchase more CDs that I wouldn't have normally purchased. As a CD seller maybe you could use a less virtual method of Pandora's "bundling" to accomplish something similar.
Ill pay if it's live.
I'll pay if it's on cd.
If it's on the internet I don't care how I get it.
If you like pandora I'd highly suggest lastfm.com
very similar but lastfm gives you access to unsigned and underground music in any genre. pandora does not have that.
5 of the top ten bands I listen to I discovered via lastfm and three of them have under 2000 likes on facebook. not big time by any means.
If the 5 dollar box of flakes is free...I'm not worried about getting a prize as well.
"If I keep getting freecornflakes, they will stop making them"
Exactly.
Which is why they put an added fee (artist kickback) on when you bought recording tapes (but it was at the end of the tape era)...before tapes went out of style.
If studies have shown that pirates end up buying anyway (as mentioned a few posts back) then what's the problem?
One can wax philosophical about the evils of free downloading all day long...and it won't make any difference because the kids (and others)will still do it anyway.
25 years ago many many people recorded songs right off the radio onto tape.
At that time the industry didn't give a damn about whether you did that or not.
It was only when the internet and the MP3 took off that everybody got their knickers in a twist.
Exactly. The "ripping" he was describing (radio to tape) was no good. Radio is a lo-fidelity source in the first place; combined with tape losses and the complexity of the equipment/setup basically relegated this type of thing to a few. No one really saw this approach as a way to avoid paying for music (although copying tapes was indeed fairly ubiquitous, but you were still limited to the tapes your friends happened to have, as well as generation loss, which basically limited the abuse.)Record sales were so much higher back then. It's dramatically dropped since the use of he internet. It continues to drop.