TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yea, long hair don't care.One can still smell the Aqua Net in this photograph.![]()
Back in the 70's the guitar player walked in with a 1968 Mustang Bass. That was entry level stuff back then. I laughed and plugged it in and played it.Almost talked myself into a Talman shorty like that, but bailed when I heard the JMJ Mustang was coming out in black. Then I bailed on that when Covid hit.
Then the problem was not the PJ, the problem was the bass's tone itself combined with that P pickup.Had a PJ and it never sounded like a pure P bass even after adding a three way isolating switch. A pure P is well, just that a pure P.
I wouldn't know. I don't worry about such things. My basses sound just fine with whatever pots are in them. And I hear absolutely no sound damping on a PJ with VVT or VTVT that isn't there with the regular VT P harness. And then if I wire the P pickup direct to the jack, all I hear is a little increase in the highs, which I don't want anyway.
I've never owned a PJ but I'm not above carving a hole in an old Allparts P-body and giving it a try. So, which J-pup position would be the most useful? The "70s closer-to-the-bridge position, or the standard position that is a bit closer to the neck. Or, will it really make any difference since it's only about 1/4" either way?
B.
my two cents: if you’re after soloing/favoring the J pickup, 60s sound would have some more body; but for blended tones (both pups on), I find it that 70s perhaps blends better. Whether the difference matters to you…well, you need to find out for yourself...