I have it narrowed down to the TT 800 and WD 800. I play a lot of slap bass and prefer a lot of low end so I can feel the notes. The TT 800 is the deepest between the 2? Also is more of a tube amp? And has 2 different channels?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
People have different needsLast year I purchased a Mesa 1x15 on the recommendation of a lot of players up here.
Nope.....not even close to the depth I can get on my Eden.
Back it went.
Quite different tones... the TT is based upon the Bass 400+ (Fender-style tone stack), WD on the WalkAbout. I prefer the WD800; the flat tone is more neutral and the tone controls are similar to Eden's World Tour amps. The second channel on the TT is similar to the D800, but with a tube in the circuit, and it offers a bit more flexibility having two channels. Probably a good idea to try both as they sound quite different. Both have tube preamps.I have it narrowed down to the TT 800 and WD 800. I play a lot of slap bass and prefer a lot of low end so I can feel the notes. The TT 800 is the deepest between the 2? Also is more of a tube amp? And has 2 different channels?
The WD and the TT both have tube driven preamps and solid state class D power amps. The WD is based on the Walkabout amp that had a tube preamp. The TT or Boogie channel is based on the 400-400+ all tube bass amp while the second channel is based on the D 800+ amp only with a tube in the preamp, something the D+ doesn’t have.I have it narrowed down to the TT 800 and WD 800. I play a lot of slap bass and prefer a lot of low end so I can feel the notes. The TT 800 is the deepest between the 2? Also is more of a tube amp? And has 2 different channels?
Well maybe it sounds like the D800+ might be what I'm after. Wish I could play these before buying.The WD and the TT both have tube driven preamps and solid state class D power amps. The WD is based on the Walkabout amp that had a tube preamp. The TT or Boogie channel is based on the 400-400+ all tube bass amp while the second channel is based on the D 800+ amp only with a tube in the preamp, something the D+ doesn’t have.
With the TT having two preamps it would be the most versatile.
The D800+ amp has no tube preamp and it’s said to sound thicker and quicker than the WD or TT and folks that like slap like it. Although with some knob movement the WD and TT can sound thicker as well and be used for slap but with their tube front ends can add more texture and seem to not feel as quick.
I like the WD myself but I am going through an old school phase right now so that amp works for me. I have not played any of the others but I do hear those that have tried both the folks that like more modern tones with heft and quickness seem to like the D+.Well maybe it sounds like the D800+ might be what I'm after. Wish I could play these before buying.
Here is an old video of WD vs D+Well maybe it sounds like the D800+ might be what I'm after. Wish I could play these before buying.
I have no reason to doubt you. It's not just the amount of air it moves, it's that sound. Been so long since I have heard one, but I remember a strong punch, probably low mids. Like my Markbass on steroids.Last year I purchased a Mesa 1x15 on the recommendation of a lot of players up here.
Nope.....not even close to the depth I can get on my Eden.
Back it went.
Did it have the dual front ports like the Eden?Stopped at Guitar Center and played a Mark Bass 4x10. Man what a let down. Eden 2x10 XLT sounds bigger than Mark Bass 4x10.
Still in the hunt! Currently leaning toward Mesa Boogie.
Nope. They didn't have that one in stock. Im guessing the 104HF 4x10 has deeper bass?Did it have the dual front ports like the Eden?
The dual front ports make a big difference. Even going from the Eden 210XLT (dual front ports) to the 210XST (single front port) there is a big difference.Nope. They didn't have that one in stock. Im guessing the 104HF 4x10 has deeper bass?
Ok thanks! Wish I could try one out. I believe ya that the ports make a big difference.The dual front ports make a big difference. Even going from the Eden 210XLT (dual front ports) to the 210XST (single front port) there is a big difference.
Those ports punch.
Have you tried a Markbass 210 combo? The CMD 102, specifically? The whole combo weighs about half of what the Eden cabinet alone weighs and it cuts like a knife.Ok thanks! Wish I could try one out. I believe ya that the ports make a big difference.
I have not. Just checked and Guitar CenterHave you tried a Markbass 210 combo? The CMD 102, specifically? The whole combo weighs about half of what the Eden cabinet alone weighs and it cuts like a knife.
Eden cabs are very hard to beat in terms of sound. Especially the XLT models. A lot of it comes down to the cab design itself. David Eden was designing speaker cabinets for various companies before ever getting into drivers or putting speakers into the cabinets he designed. He designed the SWR Goliath cabinet before making Eden's own bass cabinets. Cabinet design and driver paring is a science and art. David nailed it with Eden. Companies do not make cabinets like that anymore so nobody get close to that sound. Not to say that modern cabinets don't sound fantastic. If you're looking for that Eden tone, there's only one way to get it.Stopped at Guitar Center and played a Mark Bass 4x10. Man what a let down. Eden 2x10 XLT sounds bigger than Mark Bass 4x10.
Still in the hunt! Currently leaning toward Mesa Boogie.