For one, the odds of actually seeing one in a store were pretty low. So forget the consumer being able to actually play one. So preconceived notions will rule the day. Two, its kind of hard to sell a new design at $1500+ to a person out kicking the tires on a new bass when the $700 Ibanez next to it can play any stage and comes in 10 colors. Have you tried a newer Schecter lately? They're nice basses, and they hang right next to that P or MM copy. You can get away with those prices for a P, J, or MM. People have played your Squier, or your MIM, or your Sterling by MM and they know that upgrading is going to get them a better version of what they already love. But that odd Dimension pickguard, that EBMM that walks like a duck and quacks like a duck but isn't priced like a duck? People keep saying that companies get punished for staying in their lanes and that they don't innovate enough. Well these guys didn't do that. They basically veered into each other's lanes with thinly disguised versions of existing basses. IMO I'd hesitate to call that innovation or improvement. They basically put their name on the other's bass and hoped for enough of their loyalists to have an excuse to buy a new bass.
I'm not saying these aren't good basses. If you own one I'm not criticizing your bass. What I'm saying is that from a marketing/selling perspective these basses were an uphill sell already. And when you slap on a price tag that's about $500 high to an already tough sale.......
I'm not saying these aren't good basses. If you own one I'm not criticizing your bass. What I'm saying is that from a marketing/selling perspective these basses were an uphill sell already. And when you slap on a price tag that's about $500 high to an already tough sale.......