Quadzilla
Supporting Member
Does this pre have a tube section in it? How does channel 1 differ from channel 2 (aside from you can EQ them differently)? Any overdrive from cranking the gain? Thanks!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
coyoteboy said:I wonder if any have Jensens?
Q: it's two channel, dual input. Does that mean each input is switchable to either channel, or is only one input designed to be useda at a time? i.e. active/passive?
Quadzilla said:Does this pre have a tube section in it? How does channel 1 differ from channel 2 (aside from you can EQ them differently)? Any overdrive from cranking the gain? Thanks!
v-12 said:i just pulled the trigger on one of these; i've never played through or heard one other than basstasters and i didn't want to miss out on what seems to be a great deal! i saw on a review that its got good articulation with a nice mids; but does it have any of the demeter's shimmer? i bought it with my fingers crossed in hopes of it being "open" like the demter but a bit thicker overall..... any opinions or direct comparisons?
MacGroove said:The way the switchable channels work is if you have 2 basses plugged in, those channels are now dedicated to those basses, when you have 1 bass plugged in, the channels are now switchable.
jerry said:How are they for pushing poweramps Tom?
jerry said:Thanks Tom! I ordered one last night anyway, I'll find out with my QSCs soon enough.
tombowlus said:It is not as open and airy on the high end, though I would say it is roughly equivalent in the articulation category. It has a definite sweetness to the tone, and the overall sound is smooth and slightly dark (but not entirely). It has thickness, but still a sense of speed. I do not consider it to be an entirely flat or transparent preamp (it has its own voice), but it is quite musical, I think, and you never feel like you are missing anything (it's plenty full, plenty clear, plenty articulate, plenty punchy, etc.). It does have some tube like characteristics to the tone, I'd say, and again, it sounds really good. But I can guarantee you that blindfolded and drunk, you could still differentiate the Quest from a 201s with ease. They're not leagues apart, but they each have their own sonic footprint.
Again, this is a stupid good preamp for this price! Heck, it's a top contender in the sub $1,000 category, I'd say.
Tom.
tombowlus said:Cool! Man, you can't beat this deal.
Major props to Youngheo for giving us all the heads up!![]()
jokerjkny said:would it be heresy to run the Quest into an IP310?![]()
inazone said:![]()
one of my favorite combos it the epi 502 into a berg 322.
![]()
Folmeister said:Make that less two!
Quadzilla said:So do you think this pre would be good for rock? I play a lot of classic and modern rock and like that Ampeg type tone. I get the feeling that this is not a good fit, but you tell me...