• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass EQ Pedal for Upright

Not necessarily true. :)

The OP said that he plays a lot with knobs. When I am generally satisfied with the default sound of my signal chain, I feel no need to fiddle with the knobs. Sometimes I make slight adjustments depending on the room acoustics, and sometimes I make no adjustments whatsoever.

The situation, as described by OP, suggests that there is something in the signal chain which he doesn't like. May be it's the preamp, may be not. But expanding the EQ capabilities, as such, does not cure the underlining problem... He needs to find a signal chain the sound of which he generally likes without fiddling with knobs.

Well take it easy with the "playing with the knobs" statement, lol. I'm sure everyone tries adjusting things on their gear to see how it affects the sound. You might be looking into that a bit too hard. I'm well aware that a reductive approach is the best one(cut offensive frequencies only). I've been doing that for years. It's also a reality that most bass players struggle with the sound of their piezo pickups at one time or another and that it usually ends up being a compromise. There is also the reality that upright bass gear is hard to experiment with..good stuff is expensive and you never know if it will work well on your particular bass.

I'm also surprised at how many people are diminishing the effectiveness of using an EQ. My experience in my home studio is that EQ is one of the most important factors to sounding good in a mix and can drastically change the tone of the signal received. We all know piezo pickups need some sort of EQ in most cases to not sound like ass. My original post was really more along the lines of, is it worth adding an EQ to the chain or would i be better off getting a beefier preamp that has stronger tone shaping possibilities.
 
I do too. But suggesting 31 band EQ to be used with GK MB200 microamp seems to be an overkill...

Agreed and that was not my intent. A 31-band graphic is generally easier for most people to work with, but something compact is more appropriate in this instance. My intent was to recommend the Empress ParaEQ. I am not totally thrilled by the semiparametric nature of it, since the bandwidth is not continuously variable, but three selectable bandwidths is a decent compromise.

FYI I am actually a huge fan of parametric EQ, my first EQ was an Orban 672A (purchased in the early 80s) and I still own one to this day. I also own a KT DN410 and have spec'd them for systems over graphics. Both of these are rack mount units, so not really something I would pair with an MB200. I have also done quite a bit of mixing on Yamaha digital boards and tend to use the built-in parametric EQ for system tuning, but set up graphics on faders in case I need a quick fix for feedback in the middle of the show. The reason for this is, IMHO, parametric is more powerful and precise, but graphic is faster and easier to understand.

There are some nice 10-band graphic pedals that are useful for general tone shaping, but these are not really precise enough to be used as a notch filter. The bandwidth is too wide and the bands are spaced too far apart.
 
FYI I am actually a huge fan of parametric EQ

I love parametric EQ. IMO, once you get used to them, it's quite simple to operate

There are some nice 10-band graphic pedals that are useful for general tone shaping, but these are not really precise enough to be used as a notch filter. The bandwidth is too wide and the bands are spaced too far apart.

Correct.
 
Well take it easy with the "playing with the knobs" statement, lol. I'm sure everyone tries adjusting things on their gear to see how it affects the sound. You might be looking into that a bit too hard. I'm well aware that a reductive approach is the best one(cut offensive frequencies only). I've been doing that for years. It's also a reality that most bass players struggle with the sound of their piezo pickups at one time or another and that it usually ends up being a compromise. There is also the reality that upright bass gear is hard to experiment with..good stuff is expensive and you never know if it will work well on your particular bass.

I'm also surprised at how many people are diminishing the effectiveness of using an EQ. My experience in my home studio is that EQ is one of the most important factors to sounding good in a mix and can drastically change the tone of the signal received. We all know piezo pickups need some sort of EQ in most cases to not sound like ass. My original post was really more along the lines of, is it worth adding an EQ to the chain or would i be better off getting a beefier preamp that has stronger tone shaping possibilities.

I, see. I might misunderstood your situation...my apologies.

Even though I know how effective EQ is, I tend to use it with great caution as I know some players who overdo it and, as a result, end up with unusable sound...
 
@Ric Vice ...... I think if i were to replace something first it would be that. I like the look of of the Headway preamps and would also love to dabble in blending. Definitely will eventually replace the head to something beefier as well in the future when i can afford it as i'm sure that would help........Portability is also a big factor for me so my setup is pretty small.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]

Portability is a priority or me. Just as a way of example, I use a powered cabinet along with a separate pre amp. So, a QSC K8 paired with a Headway EDB-2 gets you a 500 watt
amp with a stellar pre amp. and small foot print. The OSC’s are frequently on sale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fat bob and Seanto

Latest posts